Course record IPHY
IPHY 3430
Human Physiology
University of Colorado Boulder
1,973 grades30 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score19/100
Needs work
Leif J Saul 721 grades · 1 term 2.47GPA
721 letter grades
Compare with the course
Saul vs. the course average
A
+3.2
B
−0.1
C
−0.6
D
−1.9
F
−0.6
Difference in percentage points.
7.2% withdrew · 56 of 777 enrolled.
Overall3.73 / 5
433 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.96
Collaboration3.63
Connection4.25
Contribution3.52
Discussion4.01
Inclusivity3.53
Grading4.11
Reflection4.26
Respect4.34
Creativity3.92
Feedback3.16
Interaction4.18
Challenge4.26
Questions4.23
Heidi Margarita Bustamante 914 grades · 1 term 2.35GPA
914 letter grades
Compare with the course
Bustamante vs. the course average
A
−1.7
B
+0.4
C
+1.6
D
+0.7
F
−1.1
Difference in percentage points.
3.4% withdrew · 32 of 946 enrolled.
Overall4.28 / 5
576 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.49
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration4.23
Connection4.67
Contribution4.33
Discussion4.58
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.48
Reflection4.64
Respect4.54
Creativity4.35
Feedback3.66
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.68
Questions4.52
Janet L Casagrand 338 grades · 1 term 2.21GPA
338 letter grades
Compare with the course
Casagrand vs. the course average
A
−2.3
B
−0.9
C
−3.0
D
+2.0
F
+4.3
Difference in percentage points.
6.9% withdrew · 25 of 363 enrolled.
Overall3.60 / 5
179 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.64
Technology3.41
Synthesis3.55
Collaboration2.73
Connection4.15
Contribution2.83
Discussion3.44
Inclusivity3.19
Grading3.75
Reflection3.75
Respect3.74
Creativity3.72
Feedback2.49
Interaction3.58
Challenge3.84
Questions3.57
Shelby Lee Hopkins 63 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
63 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.51
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.68
Connection4.64
Contribution4.69
Discussion4.71
Inclusivity3.87
Grading4.46
Reflection4.62
Respect4.93
Creativity4.29
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.46
Questions4.69
Tel Kelley 63 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
63 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.58
Collaboration4.69
Connection4.78
Contribution4.52
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.28
Grading4.43
Reflection4.71
Respect4.86
Creativity4.46
Feedback4.43
Interaction4.81
Challenge4.73
Questions4.67
Kelsey Elaine Jordan Koger 242 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
242 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.21
Technology4.27
Synthesis4.11
Collaboration4.69
Connection4.27
Contribution4.72
Discussion4.89
Inclusivity3.85
Grading4.37
Reflection4.59
Respect4.48
Creativity4.23
Feedback4.42
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.65
Questions4.70
Francoise Judith Benay 20 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.01
Technology4.94
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.56
Connection3.80
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.64
Inclusivity4.24
Grading4.56
Reflection4.58
Respect4.88
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.41
Interaction4.06
Challenge4.50
Questions4.76
Julia Hope Potocnjak-Overn 26 reported responses 3.93Eval / 5
Overall3.93 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology3.43
Synthesis4.07
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.40
Contribution4.13
Discussion3.87
Inclusivity3.80
Grading3.17
Reflection4.13
Respect4.63
Creativity3.97
Feedback3.03
Interaction4.47
Challenge4.23
Questions3.40
David Hutton 21 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.67
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration4.67
Connection4.57
Contribution4.37
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.17
Grading4.47
Reflection4.63
Respect4.73
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.23
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Siena Krueger 12 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.90
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.50
Reflection4.80
Respect4.60
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Sanna Darvish 122 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
122 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.34
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.16
Collaboration4.26
Connection4.75
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.59
Inclusivity4.06
Grading4.27
Reflection4.62
Respect4.70
Creativity4.22
Feedback3.69
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.39
Questions4.53
Logan Jay Bunch 2 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Francoise Judith Bentley 125 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
125 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.78
Collaboration4.69
Connection4.75
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity4.56
Grading4.79
Reflection4.78
Respect4.89
Creativity4.76
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.90
Questions4.84
Mckinley Coppock 51 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
51 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.84
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.80
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.71
Reflection4.78
Respect4.87
Creativity4.78
Feedback4.56
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.91
Questions4.90
Andrew Lee 22 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.47
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.47
Contribution4.83
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.17
Grading4.70
Reflection4.70
Respect4.97
Creativity4.37
Feedback4.17
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.70
Questions4.40
Kyo Lee 2 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.50
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Graham Archer 8 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.80
Connection5.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.70
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Ravi Venkatasubramanian 30 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.24
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.11
Collaboration3.97
Connection4.52
Contribution4.49
Discussion4.61
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.50
Reflection4.55
Respect4.56
Creativity4.26
Feedback3.98
Interaction4.59
Challenge4.60
Questions4.51
Lena Kuzma 38 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
38 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.44
Collaboration4.68
Connection4.72
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity4.37
Grading4.30
Reflection4.53
Respect4.77
Creativity4.49
Feedback4.12
Interaction4.64
Challenge4.54
Questions4.59
Olivia Simpson-Klein 3 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.30
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.30
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Noah Patterson 17 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.73
Connection4.57
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity3.83
Grading4.47
Reflection4.73
Respect4.70
Creativity4.17
Feedback4.27
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.40
Questions4.87
Kate Noyes 15 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.82
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.68
Collaboration4.26
Connection4.94
Contribution4.33
Discussion4.64
Inclusivity4.47
Grading4.86
Reflection4.70
Respect4.86
Creativity4.95
Feedback4.84
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.86
Questions4.96
Bri Astorino 82 reported responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5
82 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.17
Technology3.76
Synthesis4.14
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.04
Contribution3.95
Discussion4.14
Inclusivity3.84
Grading4.17
Reflection4.16
Respect4.35
Creativity4.06
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.36
Challenge4.00
Questions4.06
Alyson R Stewart 45 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
45 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.22
Technology4.66
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.32
Connection4.36
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.94
Grading4.66
Reflection4.44
Respect4.64
Creativity4.48
Feedback4.22
Interaction4.58
Challenge4.58
Questions4.74
Kora Kastengren 32 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.66
Contribution4.64
Discussion4.76
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.62
Reflection4.74
Respect4.96
Creativity4.68
Feedback4.22
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.76
Questions4.76
Riley Morgenthaler 19 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.73
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.73
Reflection4.93
Respect4.97
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.83
Questions4.83
Lyanna Ruth Kessler 21 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.97
Connection4.65
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.63
Grading4.27
Reflection4.77
Respect4.75
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.43
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Megan Jones 75 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
75 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.52
Technology4.76
Synthesis4.46
Collaboration4.44
Connection4.38
Contribution4.62
Discussion4.76
Inclusivity3.49
Grading4.62
Reflection4.77
Respect4.84
Creativity4.33
Feedback4.26
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.70
Questions4.66
Michelle Lupa 3 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.70
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.70
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Nikolaas Steele 26 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.72
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.50
Contribution4.46
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity4.48
Grading4.64
Reflection4.72
Respect4.92
Creativity4.58
Feedback4.06
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.62
Questions4.92
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.