Course record IPHY
IPHY 3415
Human Anatomy Laboratory
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable32 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score67/100
Strong
Andrew Michael Lombardi 22 reported responses 3.84Eval / 5
Overall3.84 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.83
Technology4.14
Synthesis3.31
Collaboration4.39
Connection3.40
Contribution3.33
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity3.05
Grading4.40
Reflection3.63
Respect4.36
Creativity3.05
Feedback3.05
Interaction4.49
Challenge4.04
Questions4.03
William Canty 30 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.06
Technology4.38
Synthesis4.07
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.27
Contribution4.64
Discussion4.86
Inclusivity3.59
Grading4.65
Reflection4.77
Respect4.91
Creativity4.33
Feedback4.72
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.79
Questions4.92
Trey Jouard 22 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.47
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.27
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.90
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity2.80
Grading4.33
Reflection4.63
Respect4.70
Creativity3.87
Feedback4.23
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.47
Questions4.53
Erika April Mehrhoff 2 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Catherine A. Schaefer 40 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.64
Collaboration4.97
Connection4.85
Contribution4.72
Discussion4.99
Inclusivity4.62
Grading4.96
Reflection4.97
Respect4.89
Creativity4.22
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.98
Questions4.98
Tyler Akonom 51 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
51 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.89
Technology4.38
Synthesis3.45
Collaboration4.86
Connection4.54
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.86
Inclusivity3.66
Grading4.45
Reflection4.38
Respect4.78
Creativity2.50
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.68
Questions4.95
Christian Knobloch 33 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.29
Technology4.74
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.49
Contribution4.74
Discussion4.89
Inclusivity3.46
Grading4.90
Reflection4.86
Respect4.79
Creativity4.26
Feedback4.72
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.89
Questions4.94
Zachariah Edward Morgan 34 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.89
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.51
Connection3.96
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.68
Reflection3.69
Respect4.69
Creativity4.78
Feedback4.62
Interaction4.74
Challenge4.59
Questions4.95
Alanna Mayberry 54 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
54 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.78
Connection4.84
Contribution4.64
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.97
Grading4.89
Reflection4.79
Respect5.00
Creativity4.84
Feedback4.87
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.87
Questions5.00
Siena Krueger 13 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.36
Synthesis3.77
Collaboration4.48
Connection4.66
Contribution4.37
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity3.56
Grading4.81
Reflection4.52
Respect4.66
Creativity3.59
Feedback3.69
Interaction4.42
Challenge4.19
Questions4.36
Myra Bower 28 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.82
Technology4.94
Synthesis4.76
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.88
Contribution4.84
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.67
Grading4.80
Reflection4.91
Respect4.98
Creativity4.76
Feedback4.84
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.88
Questions4.91
Heidi Margarita Bustamante 1 reported responses 3.65Eval / 5
Overall3.65 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence1.00
Technology1.00
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.00
Contribution2.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading5.00
Reflection3.00
Respect5.00
Creativity1.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge2.00
Questions3.00
Kara Ashcraft 16 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.41
Technology4.32
Synthesis4.11
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.74
Contribution4.91
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.68
Grading5.00
Reflection4.80
Respect4.98
Creativity3.93
Feedback4.43
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.65
Questions4.94
Leif J Saul 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Reflection5.00
Interaction5.00
Bre Thrower 12 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.65
Contribution4.40
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.75
Grading5.00
Reflection4.95
Respect4.95
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Elle Orie 2 reported responses 3.70Eval / 5
Overall3.70 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology3.00
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration3.50
Connection3.00
Contribution3.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.50
Reflection3.50
Respect4.00
Creativity3.00
Feedback3.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions3.00
Nicholas Merryman 49 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
49 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.98
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.09
Collaboration4.31
Connection4.26
Contribution4.39
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.33
Grading4.87
Reflection4.60
Respect4.91
Creativity4.48
Feedback4.68
Interaction4.44
Challenge4.75
Questions4.64
Steven L Hobbs 4 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.15
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect4.85
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.85
Questions4.85
Joseph Lim 61 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
61 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.67
Technology4.86
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.82
Connection4.64
Contribution4.71
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.69
Grading4.89
Reflection4.69
Respect4.86
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.85
Questions4.93
Thomas Hembree 6 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.20
Grading5.00
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Logan Edward Weinman 18 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.83
Technology4.58
Synthesis3.32
Collaboration4.47
Connection4.31
Contribution3.85
Discussion4.84
Inclusivity3.56
Grading4.75
Reflection4.51
Respect4.80
Creativity4.38
Feedback4.58
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.84
Questions4.75
Nora Want 9 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration4.25
Connection3.85
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.35
Grading4.40
Reflection4.30
Respect4.90
Creativity3.40
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.50
Questions4.60
Leah Deminski 40 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.56
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration4.81
Connection4.76
Contribution4.82
Discussion4.99
Inclusivity4.57
Grading4.93
Reflection4.84
Respect4.90
Creativity4.82
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.91
Questions5.00
Michael Thomas 37 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.48
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.41
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.45
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.71
Grading4.84
Reflection4.82
Respect4.83
Creativity4.54
Feedback4.61
Interaction4.81
Challenge4.86
Questions4.93
Gianny Venegas 12 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.65
Contribution4.65
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.90
Reflection4.85
Respect5.00
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.95
Questions5.00
Nathan Anderson 5 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.20
Technology4.90
Synthesis3.15
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.00
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.50
Reflection3.90
Respect4.75
Creativity3.40
Feedback3.20
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
Thomas Mcdaniel 10 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.10
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.60
Grading5.00
Reflection4.25
Respect5.00
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.75
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.65
Questions5.00
Morgan Hughes 13 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.98
Technology3.94
Synthesis4.91
Collaboration4.69
Connection4.57
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.94
Grading4.78
Reflection4.35
Respect4.78
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.67
Interaction4.81
Challenge4.62
Questions5.00
Lina Jaafar 21 reported responses 4.92Eval / 5
Overall4.92 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.83
Technology4.96
Synthesis4.81
Collaboration4.97
Connection4.82
Contribution4.81
Discussion4.96
Inclusivity4.66
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect4.65
Creativity4.83
Feedback4.92
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.96
Alazar Gebremichael 10 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.65
Grading5.00
Reflection4.90
Respect4.75
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions4.75
Ben Kott 23 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.65
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.95
Grading4.80
Reflection4.70
Respect4.95
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Amanda Wayne Spears Schaetzel 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.