Course record INFO
INFO 1101
Computation in Society
University of Colorado Boulder
2,886 grades32 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score37/100
Below average
Roshanna Patricia Sylvester 614 grades · 1 term 3.35GPA
614 letter grades
Compare with the course
Sylvester vs. the course average
A
−1.9
B
+4.2
C
+0.9
D
−1.1
F
−2.1
Difference in percentage points.
3.3% withdrew · 21 of 635 enrolled.
Overall4.29 / 5
111 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.70
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.30
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.30
Questions4.40
Christopher M Carruth 2,272 grades · 1 term 3.27GPA
2,272 letter grades
Compare with the course
Carruth vs. the course average
A
+0.5
B
−1.1
C
−0.3
D
+0.3
F
+0.6
Difference in percentage points.
4.5% withdrew · 107 of 2,379 enrolled.
Overall4.38 / 5
192 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.48
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.62
Contribution4.38
Discussion4.27
Inclusivity4.47
Grading4.36
Reflection4.40
Respect4.57
Creativity4.14
Feedback4.04
Interaction4.29
Challenge4.33
Questions4.28
Hande Batan 79 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
79 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.93
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.91
Collaboration4.25
Connection4.93
Contribution4.91
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.93
Grading4.93
Reflection4.68
Respect4.95
Creativity4.91
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.93
Questions4.95
Catherine Zoan Gach 71 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
71 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.70
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.70
Reflection4.60
Respect4.70
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Tajanae Harris 68 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
68 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.70
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.70
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Madelyn Zander 133 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
133 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.51
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration3.43
Connection4.79
Contribution4.44
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.58
Grading4.41
Reflection4.60
Respect4.45
Creativity4.44
Feedback4.29
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.45
Questions4.51
Jordan Wirfs-Brock 1 reported responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Janghee Cho 53 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
53 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.79
Technology4.66
Synthesis4.68
Collaboration4.24
Connection4.83
Contribution4.49
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.71
Grading4.52
Reflection4.74
Respect4.74
Creativity4.63
Feedback4.59
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.60
Questions4.48
Shiva M Darian 102 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5
102 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration3.68
Connection4.77
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity4.63
Grading4.49
Reflection4.61
Respect4.67
Creativity4.36
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.26
Challenge4.54
Questions4.51
Camryn Kelley 42 reported responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5
42 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.50
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.05
Reflection4.25
Respect4.20
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.20
Challenge3.90
Questions4.10
Chiamaka Nneoma Keren-Happuch Odinenu 42 reported responses 3.96Eval / 5
Overall3.96 / 5
42 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology3.95
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.50
Contribution4.30
Discussion3.75
Inclusivity4.35
Grading3.90
Reflection4.25
Respect4.20
Creativity3.70
Feedback3.65
Interaction4.20
Challenge3.75
Questions3.85
Dianna Radpour 4 reported responses 2.99Eval / 5
Overall2.99 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.50
Technology2.80
Synthesis3.20
Collaboration2.50
Connection3.30
Contribution2.80
Discussion3.00
Inclusivity2.50
Grading3.50
Reflection3.70
Respect3.00
Creativity2.50
Feedback2.20
Interaction3.70
Challenge3.00
Questions2.50
Chris Carruth 588 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5
588 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.81
Technology4.87
Synthesis4.77
Collaboration3.48
Connection4.88
Contribution4.76
Discussion4.29
Inclusivity4.83
Grading4.64
Reflection4.81
Respect4.86
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.33
Interaction4.37
Challenge4.67
Questions4.68
Temi Olorunsogo 175 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5
175 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.48
Synthesis4.94
Collaboration3.66
Connection4.98
Contribution4.92
Discussion4.42
Inclusivity4.94
Grading4.28
Reflection4.79
Respect4.63
Creativity4.61
Feedback4.40
Interaction3.71
Challenge4.73
Questions4.58
Fuji Robledo Yamamoto 49 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5
49 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.40
Connection4.70
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.20
Reflection4.60
Respect4.50
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.40
Questions4.60
Divyanshu Kumar Singh 140 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
140 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.88
Connection4.70
Contribution4.68
Discussion4.74
Inclusivity4.48
Grading4.68
Reflection4.59
Respect4.66
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.72
Interaction4.48
Challenge4.65
Questions4.68
Kit Lewers 121 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
121 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration3.45
Connection4.85
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.50
Reflection4.75
Respect4.70
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.05
Challenge4.60
Questions4.40
Faye Kollig 117 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5
117 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.68
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.73
Collaboration3.28
Connection4.88
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.38
Inclusivity4.81
Grading4.55
Reflection4.68
Respect4.63
Creativity4.53
Feedback4.43
Interaction3.88
Challenge4.53
Questions4.50
Kendall Fronabarger 55 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5
55 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration3.30
Connection4.80
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.50
Reflection4.60
Respect4.60
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.20
Interaction3.80
Challenge4.60
Questions4.40
Amber Turner 47 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5
47 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration3.30
Connection4.90
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.40
Reflection4.70
Respect4.50
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.20
Interaction3.90
Challenge4.40
Questions4.20
Deepika Rama Subramanian 1 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration3.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Challenge4.00
Questions5.00
Camille Butera 158 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
158 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.91
Technology4.32
Synthesis4.24
Collaboration2.13
Connection4.32
Contribution4.28
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.87
Reflection4.30
Respect4.93
Creativity4.26
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.77
Challenge3.66
Questions4.85
Sid Cook 148 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
148 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.10
Connection4.70
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.40
Reflection4.60
Respect4.60
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.20
Interaction3.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Laurie Jones 144 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5
144 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.10
Connection4.70
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.30
Reflection4.60
Respect4.70
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.30
Interaction3.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.40
Katy Weathington 142 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
142 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.10
Connection4.70
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.40
Reflection4.60
Respect4.60
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.20
Interaction3.80
Challenge4.40
Questions4.40
Samantha Thuy-Linh Dalal 3 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.30
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction3.50
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Anas Buhayh 70 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
70 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.91
Technology4.93
Synthesis4.88
Collaboration4.52
Connection4.93
Contribution4.86
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.91
Grading4.86
Reflection4.88
Respect4.91
Creativity4.88
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.88
Questions4.82
Yiran Duan 114 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5
114 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.05
Connection4.62
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.22
Inclusivity4.45
Grading4.32
Reflection4.50
Respect4.50
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.22
Interaction3.82
Challenge4.40
Questions4.45
Alice Goldfarb 111 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5
111 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.05
Connection4.62
Contribution4.48
Discussion4.28
Inclusivity4.45
Grading4.35
Reflection4.50
Respect4.42
Creativity4.42
Feedback4.30
Interaction3.82
Challenge4.38
Questions4.25
Amanda Aird 48 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5
48 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.10
Connection4.60
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.40
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.20
Interaction3.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.40
Frida Mudsam 40 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration3.30
Connection4.80
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.60
Reflection4.60
Respect4.70
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.60
Questions4.50
Joseph Trybala 4 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.80
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.