Course record IAFS
IAFS 3000
Special Topics in International Affairs
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable14 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score58/100
Mixed record
Antonio Papuzza 35 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
35 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.87
Technology4.86
Synthesis4.82
Collaboration4.79
Connection4.99
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.82
Reflection4.14
Respect4.98
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.89
Questions4.94
Douglas J Snyder 19 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection5.00
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.90
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Caroline S Conzelman 19 reported responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.40
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.40
Grading3.90
Reflection4.20
Respect4.30
Creativity3.80
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.90
Questions4.30
Gregory D Young 15 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.90
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.70
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.70
Questions4.50
Jaclyn Ann Abeloe 9 reported responses 3.81Eval / 5
Overall3.81 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration3.40
Connection4.20
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.30
Reflection4.30
Respect4.10
Creativity2.90
Feedback3.20
Interaction4.60
Challenge3.20
Questions4.40
Al Pisano 11 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.80
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.10
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.50
Nguyet Thi Minh Nguyen 13 reported responses 4.08Eval / 5
Overall4.08 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.86
Technology4.61
Synthesis3.26
Collaboration1.78
Connection4.51
Contribution3.86
Discussion3.65
Inclusivity4.61
Grading2.95
Reflection3.53
Respect4.25
Creativity3.95
Feedback3.62
Interaction3.03
Challenge3.69
Questions4.28
Steven Matthew Beard 34 reported responses 3.98Eval / 5
Overall3.98 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.33
Synthesis3.98
Collaboration3.94
Connection4.45
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.53
Inclusivity4.55
Grading3.89
Reflection4.42
Respect4.46
Creativity3.91
Feedback4.02
Interaction4.56
Challenge4.15
Questions4.33
Heather L Adams 10 reported responses 3.84Eval / 5
Overall3.84 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.30
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.60
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.30
Grading3.50
Reflection3.20
Respect4.60
Creativity3.00
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.70
Challenge3.20
Questions4.40
Molly Todd 24 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.96
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.97
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.97
Contribution4.98
Discussion4.99
Inclusivity4.99
Grading4.96
Reflection4.98
Respect4.99
Creativity4.98
Feedback4.93
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.98
Questions4.78
Robert James Wyrod 14 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.60
Connection5.00
Contribution4.60
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.90
Reflection5.00
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Lucy P Chester 16 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.80
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.50
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Jeffrey Scott Nonnemacher 49 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
49 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.92
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.72
Connection4.98
Contribution4.82
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.71
Reflection4.82
Respect4.88
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.78
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.98
Grant Cohen 3 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.30
Respect5.00
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.