Course record GEOL

GEOL 5700

Geological Topics Seminar

University of Colorado Boulder

Grade distribution unavailable25 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score78/100
Strong

Professors 25 of 25

Shemin Ge 6 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology3.93
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.13
Connection4.09
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.43
Grading5.00
Reflection4.78
Respect5.00
Creativity4.18
Feedback3.96
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.93
Karl Jules Mueller 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Irina Overeem 11 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.61
Technology4.98
Synthesis4.98
Collaboration4.48
Connection5.00
Contribution4.99
Discussion4.99
Inclusivity4.99
Grading4.84
Reflection4.98
Respect5.00
Creativity4.97
Feedback4.83
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.98
Questions4.99
Karen Chin 5 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.99
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.49
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.97
Grading4.97
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.98
Feedback4.51
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.99
Questions5.00
Alisha Nicole Clark 11 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.80
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.30
Reflection4.75
Respect5.00
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.25
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.85
Questions4.60
Rebecca M Flowers 2 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge3.50
Questions5.00
Alexis S Templeton 14 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.99
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.99
Collaboration4.99
Connection4.99
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect4.99
Creativity4.99
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.99
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Paul Weimer 1 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration2.00
Connection5.00
Contribution3.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect4.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Michael John Willis 4 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.70
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading3.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.80
Leilani A Arthurs 3 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.96
Technology4.96
Synthesis4.04
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.96
Contribution4.08
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.08
Grading4.96
Reflection4.96
Respect5.00
Creativity4.92
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.96
Questions5.00
Sebastian H Kopf 19 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.77
Collaboration4.58
Connection4.31
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity3.33
Grading4.91
Reflection4.59
Respect4.91
Creativity4.68
Feedback4.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.87
Questions4.82
Carl Simpson 4 reported responses 4.08Eval / 5
Overall4.08 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.07
Technology4.16
Synthesis4.16
Collaboration4.07
Connection4.93
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.23
Inclusivity4.77
Grading3.77
Reflection4.77
Respect4.16
Creativity5.00
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.93
Challenge3.46
Questions4.07
Bradley Ross Markle 24 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5

24 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.99
Technology4.99
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.84
Connection4.99
Contribution4.85
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.60
Grading5.00
Reflection4.78
Respect5.00
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.98
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.99
Questions5.00
Elizabeth Jane Trower 1 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection5.00
Respect4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.00
Questions4.00
Carolyn Alicia Crow 5 reported responses 4.96Eval / 5
Overall4.96 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge5.00
Questions4.80
Boswell A Wing 3 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.23
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.88
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.12
Respect5.00
Creativity4.88
Feedback2.69
Interaction4.23
Challenge5.00
Questions2.58
Suzanne Prestrud Anderson 9 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.86
Technology4.96
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.86
Connection4.90
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.39
Grading3.50
Reflection4.88
Respect4.90
Creativity4.36
Feedback4.46
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.62
Questions4.76
Jo Martin 2 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Gregory E Tucker 2 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Robert S Anderson 1 reported responses 4.15Eval / 5
Overall4.15 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.00
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.00
Questions5.00
Kathryn Elaine Snell 3 reported responses 4.98Eval / 5
Overall4.98 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.30
Grading5.00
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Lena Nyblade 2 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.50
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Eric Evan Small Tilton 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Shaily Rahman 1 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback3.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Jacob Tidwell 2 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.