Course record GEOL
GEOL 1150
Water, Energy and Environment: An Introduction to Earth Resources
University of Colorado Boulder
583 grades22 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score25/100
Below average
Alexis S Templeton 82 grades · 1 term 3.22GPA
82 letter grades
Compare with the course
Templeton vs. the course average
A
+8.3
B
−0.8
C
−0.3
D
−3.6
F
−3.6
Difference in percentage points.
2.4% withdrew · 2 of 84 enrolled.
Overall4.39 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.90
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.30
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.60
Questions4.50
Eric Small Tilton 52 grades · 1 term 3.19GPA
52 letter grades
Compare with the course
Tilton vs. the course average
A
+6.6
B
+2.8
C
−4.8
D
−1.0
F
−3.6
Difference in percentage points.
5.5% withdrew · 3 of 55 enrolled.
Shemin Ge 126 grades · 1 term 3.08GPA
126 letter grades
Compare with the course
Ge vs. the course average
A
−2.5
B
+13.1
C
−8.6
D
−0.8
F
−1.2
Difference in percentage points.
6.7% withdrew · 9 of 135 enrolled.
Overall4.25 / 5
43 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.19
Technology4.49
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.12
Connection4.77
Contribution4.16
Discussion4.26
Inclusivity4.33
Grading4.36
Reflection4.58
Respect4.78
Creativity4.45
Feedback3.98
Interaction4.57
Challenge4.37
Questions4.59
Aaron Ashley Hurst 144 grades · 1 term 3.00GPA
144 letter grades
Compare with the course
Hurst vs. the course average
A
+2.8
B
−2.0
C
same
D
−2.0
F
+1.3
Difference in percentage points.
5.3% withdrew · 8 of 152 enrolled.
Overall4.46 / 5
35 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.39
Technology4.24
Synthesis4.42
Collaboration4.04
Connection4.98
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.61
Inclusivity4.23
Grading4.42
Reflection4.24
Respect4.80
Creativity4.23
Feedback4.22
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.43
Questions4.98
Jennifer A Stempien 88 grades · 1 term 2.80GPA
88 letter grades
Compare with the course
Stempien vs. the course average
A
−2.4
B
−5.1
C
+3.4
D
+3.2
F
+0.9
Difference in percentage points.
5.4% withdrew · 5 of 93 enrolled.
Overall4.20 / 5
59 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology4.48
Synthesis4.28
Collaboration4.11
Connection4.69
Contribution3.99
Discussion4.32
Inclusivity4.09
Grading3.92
Reflection4.58
Respect4.61
Creativity3.99
Feedback3.62
Interaction4.51
Challenge4.11
Questions4.23
Leilani A Arthurs 91 grades · 1 term 2.50GPA
91 letter grades
Compare with the course
Arthurs vs. the course average
A
−9.9
B
−10.9
C
+11.7
D
+5.1
F
+4.1
Difference in percentage points.
6.2% withdrew · 6 of 97 enrolled.
Overall4.77 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.70
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Chloe Brashear 12 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.91
Technology4.94
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.86
Connection5.00
Contribution4.91
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.93
Reflection4.51
Respect4.98
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.93
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.83
Questions4.95
Eric Evan Small Tilton 9 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.40
Connection5.00
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.45
Reflection4.55
Respect4.90
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
William Phillip Bennett 7 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.83
Synthesis4.07
Collaboration4.33
Connection4.50
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.40
Reflection4.60
Respect4.50
Creativity4.33
Feedback4.43
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.57
Questions4.57
Quelyn Bekkering 16 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.75
Contribution4.13
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.52
Grading4.30
Reflection4.35
Respect4.75
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.48
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.20
Questions4.58
Harry Allbrook 7 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.90
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.90
Reflection4.25
Respect4.90
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.65
Questions4.85
Liza Jane Wernicke 11 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.67
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.67
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.13
Grading4.47
Reflection4.47
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.57
Questions4.67
Sean Pomeroy 18 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.67
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.50
Reflection4.57
Respect4.47
Creativity4.37
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.37
Questions4.67
Lydia Ann Pinkham 8 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.75
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.90
Reflection4.75
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.65
Questions4.90
Tricia Tellez 13 reported responses 3.26Eval / 5
Overall3.26 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.08
Technology3.53
Synthesis2.80
Collaboration2.97
Connection3.20
Contribution2.95
Discussion3.75
Inclusivity2.35
Grading2.97
Reflection3.12
Respect4.05
Creativity3.25
Feedback2.88
Interaction3.88
Challenge3.17
Questions3.78
Cameron Chambers 8 reported responses 4.07Eval / 5
Overall4.07 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology3.60
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.40
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity3.20
Grading3.90
Reflection4.10
Respect4.10
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.10
Questions4.60
Amy Vodopyanov 62 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
62 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.36
Technology4.51
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.27
Connection4.80
Contribution4.32
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.28
Grading4.74
Reflection4.37
Respect4.67
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.61
Interaction4.62
Challenge4.42
Questions4.75
Andrea Halling 9 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.90
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.70
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.95
Grading4.55
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.60
Questions4.65
Israel Carrillo 10 reported responses 3.30Eval / 5
Overall3.30 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.35
Technology2.65
Synthesis3.35
Collaboration3.30
Connection3.70
Contribution2.95
Discussion3.45
Inclusivity3.15
Grading3.05
Reflection3.35
Respect4.00
Creativity3.40
Feedback2.55
Interaction3.95
Challenge3.30
Questions4.00
Laura Chimiak 40 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.90
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.60
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.40
Questions4.80
Kevin Rozmiarek 11 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.90
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.60
Reflection4.85
Respect4.65
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.75
Questions5.00
Ayon Saha 15 reported responses 3.61Eval / 5
Overall3.61 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology3.60
Synthesis3.53
Collaboration3.73
Connection3.98
Contribution3.83
Discussion3.85
Inclusivity3.43
Grading3.08
Reflection3.45
Respect4.00
Creativity3.60
Feedback3.40
Interaction3.95
Challenge3.58
Questions4.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.