Course record GEOL
GEOL 1030
Intro to Geology Lab 1
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable60 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score56/100
Mixed record
Harry Fuchs Brodsky 20 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.82
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.54
Connection4.77
Contribution4.84
Discussion4.84
Inclusivity4.78
Grading4.73
Reflection4.80
Respect4.94
Creativity4.63
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.76
Questions4.68
Austin Sorscher 19 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology4.77
Synthesis3.62
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.16
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.63
Grading4.61
Reflection4.10
Respect5.00
Creativity3.78
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.82
Questions4.80
Liza Jane Wernicke 8 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.40
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity2.60
Grading3.80
Reflection4.10
Respect4.90
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.10
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.40
Questions4.40
Liam John Friar 10 reported responses 3.94Eval / 5
Overall3.94 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology4.16
Synthesis4.61
Collaboration4.74
Connection4.03
Contribution4.66
Discussion4.84
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.43
Reflection4.72
Respect4.91
Creativity3.64
Feedback4.58
Interaction4.76
Challenge4.49
Questions4.75
Jamie A Glass 22 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.71
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.64
Collaboration4.89
Connection3.60
Contribution4.68
Discussion4.74
Inclusivity3.73
Grading4.27
Reflection3.77
Respect4.97
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.74
Questions4.99
Harpreet Kaur Batther 17 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.89
Technology4.61
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration4.94
Connection4.42
Contribution4.83
Discussion4.72
Inclusivity4.58
Grading4.75
Reflection4.83
Respect4.92
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.64
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.86
Questions4.86
Elize Monique Chaves 50 reported responses 3.91Eval / 5
Overall3.91 / 5
50 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.22
Synthesis3.99
Collaboration4.28
Connection4.18
Contribution4.02
Discussion4.41
Inclusivity3.69
Grading4.05
Reflection4.37
Respect4.72
Creativity4.14
Feedback3.99
Interaction4.71
Challenge4.29
Questions4.19
Scott Martin Stokes 4 reported responses 3.49Eval / 5
Overall3.49 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology3.50
Synthesis2.80
Collaboration1.50
Connection3.50
Contribution3.00
Discussion3.50
Inclusivity1.70
Grading4.50
Reflection2.80
Respect4.80
Creativity3.00
Feedback3.30
Interaction3.50
Challenge3.00
Questions3.80
Stephanie Marie Plaza Torres 23 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.07
Technology4.37
Synthesis3.94
Collaboration4.46
Connection3.99
Contribution4.31
Discussion4.52
Inclusivity3.73
Grading4.13
Reflection4.15
Respect4.81
Creativity3.96
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.55
Questions4.73
Ciara Kathryn Asamoto 7 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.84
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.55
Contribution4.93
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.93
Grading4.88
Reflection4.93
Respect4.50
Creativity4.77
Feedback4.88
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.73
Questions4.73
Lon D Abbott 496 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
496 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.78
Connection4.55
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.19
Grading4.57
Reflection4.48
Respect4.74
Creativity4.44
Feedback4.51
Interaction4.76
Challenge4.64
Questions4.79
Eva Nur Jorn 31 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration4.73
Connection4.67
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity4.37
Grading4.61
Reflection4.76
Respect4.82
Creativity4.48
Feedback4.48
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.58
Questions4.87
Brianna Marie Hibner 22 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.55
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.65
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.75
Questions4.70
Hayley Isabelle Bennett 86 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
86 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.76
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.91
Connection4.98
Contribution4.91
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.54
Grading4.84
Reflection4.76
Respect4.99
Creativity4.68
Feedback4.83
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.84
Questions4.92
Tyler Lincoln 28 reported responses 4.18Eval / 5
Overall4.18 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.54
Technology3.99
Synthesis3.31
Collaboration3.71
Connection4.26
Contribution3.62
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity2.45
Grading4.00
Reflection3.89
Respect4.26
Creativity4.48
Feedback3.74
Interaction4.10
Challenge3.96
Questions4.00
Melia Kendall 12 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.65
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.00
Reflection4.15
Respect4.90
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.35
Questions4.65
Sean Pomeroy 7 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.50
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.75
Reflection4.40
Respect4.85
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.50
Questions4.90
Jennifer Reyne Davis 8 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.15
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.85
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity2.85
Grading4.50
Reflection4.65
Respect4.90
Creativity3.95
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.50
Questions4.75
Robert Vincent Kelleher 16 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.66
Technology4.76
Synthesis4.66
Collaboration4.86
Connection4.81
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.86
Inclusivity4.56
Grading4.90
Reflection4.67
Respect4.95
Creativity4.86
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Harry Allbrook 71 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
71 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.52
Technology4.51
Synthesis4.41
Collaboration4.84
Connection4.43
Contribution4.48
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.16
Grading4.85
Reflection4.43
Respect4.79
Creativity4.41
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.60
Questions4.96
Clay Woods 8 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.85
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.90
Reflection4.50
Respect4.75
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.15
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.65
Questions5.00
Nicole Ks Brooks 11 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.80
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.45
Grading4.75
Reflection4.60
Respect4.85
Creativity4.60
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.75
Questions4.95
Enrique Rodolfo Chon 15 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.26
Technology4.23
Synthesis4.32
Collaboration4.49
Connection4.65
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.08
Grading3.95
Reflection4.58
Respect4.88
Creativity4.32
Feedback3.96
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.55
Questions4.56
Ethan Pierce 4 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.80
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.30
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Tricia Tellez 10 reported responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology3.95
Synthesis3.95
Collaboration4.65
Connection3.90
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.50
Reflection4.35
Respect4.50
Creativity3.65
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.10
Questions4.90
Stephanie Tkacik 42 reported responses 4.01Eval / 5
Overall4.01 / 5
42 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology4.07
Synthesis3.45
Collaboration4.59
Connection3.87
Contribution3.83
Discussion4.02
Inclusivity3.18
Grading3.31
Reflection3.19
Respect4.02
Creativity3.64
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.00
Questions4.14
Adam Manaster 15 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.65
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.70
Reflection4.65
Respect4.85
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.60
Questions4.85
Amanda Steckel 44 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5
44 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.96
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.58
Connection4.17
Contribution4.17
Discussion4.48
Inclusivity3.31
Grading4.00
Reflection4.14
Respect4.37
Creativity3.94
Feedback4.01
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.20
Questions4.30
Cole Cochran 19 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.56
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.58
Collaboration4.79
Connection4.78
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity4.49
Grading4.64
Reflection4.81
Respect4.81
Creativity4.76
Feedback4.61
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.77
Questions4.91
Haley Brumberger 46 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
46 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.41
Technology4.71
Synthesis4.32
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.72
Contribution4.38
Discussion4.76
Inclusivity3.91
Grading4.76
Reflection4.40
Respect4.94
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.86
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.66
Questions4.99
Connor Antonio Diaz 50 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
50 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.76
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.66
Collaboration4.91
Connection4.76
Contribution4.81
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.75
Reflection4.82
Respect4.91
Creativity4.81
Feedback4.81
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.88
Questions4.99
Bri Hibner 27 reported responses 4.18Eval / 5
Overall4.18 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.97
Technology4.12
Synthesis3.88
Collaboration4.37
Connection4.50
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.26
Inclusivity3.77
Grading3.84
Reflection4.06
Respect4.17
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.58
Interaction4.46
Challenge3.83
Questions4.32
Claudia Corona 4 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.80
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.70
Grading5.00
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.00
Questions5.00
Jenn Davis 5 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.00
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.20
Reflection4.20
Respect4.20
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.40
Questions4.20
Halina Dingo 34 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.66
Collaboration4.89
Connection4.82
Contribution4.86
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.76
Grading4.87
Reflection4.85
Respect4.91
Creativity4.68
Feedback4.72
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.78
Questions4.92
Laurel Bayless 34 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.80
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.72
Inclusivity4.49
Grading4.67
Reflection4.45
Respect4.93
Creativity4.31
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.77
Questions4.82
Earl White 9 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.65
Technology4.35
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.55
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.60
Reflection4.40
Respect4.65
Creativity3.95
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.70
Challenge3.95
Questions4.55
Juliana Ruef 8 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.69
Technology4.81
Synthesis4.81
Collaboration4.81
Connection4.81
Contribution4.69
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.69
Reflection4.88
Respect5.00
Creativity4.31
Feedback4.69
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.69
Questions4.81
Corrine Liu 10 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.70
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.90
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Indigo Luisa Heine 31 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.67
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration4.82
Connection4.55
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.60
Reflection4.55
Respect4.92
Creativity4.64
Feedback4.68
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.87
Questions4.86
Rhys-Jasper Leon 8 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.10
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.60
Grading5.00
Reflection4.75
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Liza Bednarek Wernicke 4 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology3.80
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.80
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity3.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.00
Questions5.00
Barra Peak 2 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.00
Reflection4.50
Respect4.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.00
Questions4.50
Wolfgang Lopez 4 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.50
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.65
Reflection4.35
Respect4.85
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.85
Questions4.85
Holly Fortener 22 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.51
Technology4.76
Synthesis4.42
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.64
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity3.63
Grading4.72
Reflection4.82
Respect4.69
Creativity4.53
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.50
Questions4.92
Jo Martin 9 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.70
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.75
Reflection4.80
Respect4.85
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.75
Questions5.00
Maya Mcdonough 39 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.68
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.82
Connection4.70
Contribution4.49
Discussion4.72
Inclusivity3.92
Grading4.67
Reflection4.57
Respect4.81
Creativity4.59
Feedback4.59
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.56
Questions4.86
Sierra Weirens 25 reported responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.97
Technology4.09
Synthesis3.92
Collaboration4.29
Connection4.18
Contribution3.68
Discussion3.97
Inclusivity3.62
Grading3.99
Reflection3.86
Respect4.64
Creativity3.98
Feedback3.74
Interaction4.27
Challenge4.00
Questions4.25
Paloma Siegel 30 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology4.89
Synthesis4.51
Collaboration4.88
Connection4.71
Contribution4.83
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.22
Grading4.92
Reflection4.92
Respect4.92
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.83
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.70
Questions4.88
Herman Garcia 49 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
49 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.21
Collaboration4.72
Connection4.37
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.01
Grading4.27
Reflection4.22
Respect4.77
Creativity4.11
Feedback4.13
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.42
Questions4.63
Jordan Herbert 4 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.20
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.80
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Jim Gutoski 43 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
43 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.57
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.62
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.45
Reflection4.54
Respect4.56
Creativity4.33
Feedback4.38
Interaction4.56
Challenge4.52
Questions4.73
Josie Arcuri 7 reported responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology3.75
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.40
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.15
Grading3.65
Reflection4.25
Respect4.50
Creativity3.60
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.25
Questions4.50
Olivia Stanley 10 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.85
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.90
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.85
Lily Zugschwert 10 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.70
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.60
Grading5.00
Reflection4.80
Respect4.70
Creativity4.70
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Spencer Shaw 20 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.85
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.55
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.70
Questions4.95
Evan Hoeft 20 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.40
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.00
Reflection4.35
Respect4.55
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.70
Questions4.65
Andrew Gmerek 11 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.60
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.60
Reflection4.70
Respect4.60
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.35
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Ayon Saha 7 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.70
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.70
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Nicole Mizrahi 7 reported responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration4.10
Connection3.70
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.00
Reflection3.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge3.90
Questions4.60
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.