Course record GEOG
GEOG 4002
Topics in Human and Environment/Society Geography
University of Colorado Boulder
58 grades14 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score42/100
Mixed record
John O'Loughlin 37 grades · 1 term 2.91GPA
37 letter grades
Compare with the course
O'Loughlin vs. the course average
A
−9.2
B
+4.6
C
+3.6
D
same
F
+1.0
Difference in percentage points.
2.6% withdrew · 1 of 38 enrolled.
Overall3.79 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.95
Technology4.79
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.76
Connection4.96
Contribution4.83
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.98
Grading3.89
Reflection4.88
Respect4.94
Creativity4.74
Feedback4.78
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.89
Questions4.90
Colleen Elizabeth Reid 21 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.42GPA
21 letter grades · Limited sample
8.7% withdrew · 2 of 23 enrolled.
Overall4.55 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.90
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.30
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.40
Timothy S Oakes 3 reported responses 4.99Eval / 5
Overall4.99 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.51
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Wilma Doris Loayza 25 reported responses 3.96Eval / 5
Overall3.96 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.14
Technology3.27
Synthesis3.51
Collaboration3.13
Connection4.72
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.47
Inclusivity4.84
Grading2.35
Reflection4.33
Respect4.62
Creativity2.84
Feedback2.69
Interaction4.46
Challenge4.06
Questions3.82
Sean Benjamin 19 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.90
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.90
Mariah C Bowman 19 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.90
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.70
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Sara Fleming 19 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.90
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.70
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Jennifer L Fluri 19 reported responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.90
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.90
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions4.60
Brigid Morgan Mark 19 reported responses 4.92Eval / 5
Overall4.92 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.90
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.90
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Sabrina C Sideris 3 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.70
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Isaac Rivera 2 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Gretchen Lang 3 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.70
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.30
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.30
Questions4.70
Farishta Sakhi 7 reported responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology3.70
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.60
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.30
Grading3.60
Reflection4.40
Respect4.30
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.30
Questions3.90
Fedor Popov 6 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.20
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.30
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.80
Grading3.00
Reflection5.00
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback3.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.70
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.