Course record GEOG
GEOG 3742
Place, Power, and Contemporary Culture
University of Colorado Boulder
383 grades13 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score55/100
Mixed record
Taneesha Mohan 60 grades · 1 term 3.64GPA
60 letter grades
Compare with the course
Mohan vs. the course average
A
+15.2
B
−9.4
C
−4.5
D
−1.0
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 60 enrolled.
Overall4.31 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.90
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.10
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.40
Questions4.40
Azita Ranjbar 185 grades · 1 term 3.58GPA
185 letter grades
Compare with the course
Ranjbar vs. the course average
A
+11.5
B
−9.7
C
−1.3
D
+0.6
F
−1.0
Difference in percentage points.
3.6% withdrew · 7 of 192 enrolled.
Overall4.57 / 5
93 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.28
Connection4.85
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.52
Inclusivity4.88
Grading4.68
Reflection4.63
Respect4.88
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.78
Joseph Henry Bryan 113 grades · 1 term 3.17GPA
113 letter grades
Compare with the course
Bryan vs. the course average
A
−25.8
B
+22.4
C
+5.4
D
−0.2
F
−1.9
Difference in percentage points.
1.7% withdrew · 2 of 115 enrolled.
Overall4.41 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.29
Technology4.58
Synthesis4.12
Collaboration4.02
Connection4.65
Contribution4.09
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.15
Reflection4.45
Respect4.82
Creativity4.19
Feedback4.12
Interaction4.35
Challenge4.42
Questions4.70
Phurwa Gurung 25 grades · 1 term 2.94GPA
25 letter grades
Compare with the course
Gurung vs. the course average
A
−4.8
B
−6.7
C
−3.8
D
−1.0
F
+16.3
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 25 enrolled.
Overall4.68 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.90
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.50
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Shruthi Nidhi Jagadeesh 88 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
88 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.98
Technology4.99
Synthesis4.98
Collaboration3.64
Connection4.99
Contribution4.99
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity4.99
Grading4.52
Reflection4.98
Respect4.99
Creativity4.53
Feedback4.53
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.98
Questions4.98
Abby Lynn Hickcox 80 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5
80 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.98
Technology4.96
Synthesis4.96
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.99
Contribution4.97
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.94
Reflection4.99
Respect4.99
Creativity4.89
Feedback4.96
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.98
Questions4.97
Gabriella Renee Subia Smith 31 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.69
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.46
Connection4.73
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.77
Grading4.63
Reflection4.79
Respect4.98
Creativity4.82
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.79
Questions4.70
Jessica Marie Dicarlo 16 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.61
Technology4.64
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.61
Contribution4.74
Discussion4.64
Inclusivity4.71
Grading4.26
Reflection4.74
Respect4.61
Creativity4.43
Feedback3.81
Interaction4.64
Challenge4.61
Questions4.67
Isaac Rivera 16 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.09
Connection4.69
Contribution4.48
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.92
Grading4.11
Reflection4.57
Respect4.85
Creativity4.62
Feedback3.98
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.62
Questions4.38
Viviana Solange Huilinir Curio 2 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.50
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Naomi Prachi Hazarika 3 reported responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.00
Reflection4.70
Respect4.70
Creativity4.70
Feedback3.30
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.30
Questions4.70
David Antonio Bachrach 9 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.23
Connection4.07
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.93
Grading4.83
Reflection4.33
Respect4.73
Creativity4.67
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.67
Questions4.73
Viviana Huiliã±Ir-Curio 4 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.80
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.50
Grading5.00
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.20
Challenge5.00
Questions4.50
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.