Course record GEOG
GEOG 3692
Introduction to Global Public Health
University of Colorado Boulder
1,587 grades32 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score30/100
Below average
Gay Olsen 188 grades · 1 term 3.43GPA
188 letter grades
Compare with the course
Olsen vs. the course average
A
+20.6
B
−11.2
C
−6.8
D
−1.4
F
−1.1
Difference in percentage points.
4.6% withdrew · 9 of 197 enrolled.
Overall4.33 / 5
106 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.31
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration4.05
Connection4.34
Contribution4.07
Discussion4.13
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.24
Reflection4.32
Respect4.52
Creativity4.57
Feedback3.82
Interaction4.29
Challenge4.40
Questions4.43
Colleen Elizabeth Reid 927 grades · 1 term 3.16GPA
927 letter grades
Compare with the course
Reid vs. the course average
A
−1.9
B
+3.1
C
+0.4
D
−0.1
F
−1.4
Difference in percentage points.
4.0% withdrew · 39 of 966 enrolled.
Overall4.09 / 5
556 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.39
Technology4.49
Synthesis4.18
Collaboration3.77
Connection4.71
Contribution4.07
Discussion4.47
Inclusivity4.62
Grading4.18
Reflection4.40
Respect4.61
Creativity3.99
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.23
Challenge4.29
Questions4.38
Jessica Marie Finlay 299 grades · 1 term 2.99GPA
299 letter grades
Compare with the course
Finlay vs. the course average
A
−1.9
B
−3.5
C
+2.3
D
+0.7
F
+2.4
Difference in percentage points.
3.9% withdrew · 12 of 311 enrolled.
Overall4.49 / 5
197 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.18
Connection4.82
Contribution4.33
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.88
Grading4.52
Reflection4.62
Respect4.82
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.02
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.45
Questions4.72
Maureen Floriano 173 grades · 1 term 2.84GPA
173 letter grades
Compare with the course
Floriano vs. the course average
A
−9.0
B
+1.8
C
+1.3
D
+1.0
F
+4.8
Difference in percentage points.
3.4% withdrew · 6 of 179 enrolled.
Overall4.40 / 5
322 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology4.61
Synthesis4.27
Collaboration4.03
Connection4.83
Contribution4.18
Discussion4.47
Inclusivity4.79
Grading4.36
Reflection4.52
Respect4.75
Creativity4.33
Feedback3.95
Interaction4.54
Challenge4.44
Questions4.54
Sepideh Jalayer 2 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.00
Reflection5.00
Respect4.50
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Shelby L Ross 68 reported responses 3.90Eval / 5
Overall3.90 / 5
68 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.32
Technology4.24
Synthesis3.78
Collaboration4.47
Connection4.42
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.47
Inclusivity4.53
Grading3.27
Reflection4.27
Respect4.43
Creativity3.57
Feedback3.26
Interaction4.54
Challenge3.66
Questions3.75
Juan Pablo Ramirez 127 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5
127 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.28
Technology3.87
Synthesis4.18
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.52
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading3.92
Reflection4.13
Respect4.45
Creativity3.84
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.36
Challenge4.26
Questions4.08
Benjamin Nevis Barron 52 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
52 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.79
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.64
Collaboration3.92
Connection4.96
Contribution4.71
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.95
Grading4.88
Reflection4.86
Respect4.96
Creativity4.67
Feedback4.53
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.82
Questions4.88
Emma Rieves 28 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.45
Connection4.50
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.60
Grading3.80
Reflection4.50
Respect4.75
Creativity3.95
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.45
Questions4.25
Caitlin M Ryan 94 reported responses 3.96Eval / 5
Overall3.96 / 5
94 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.17
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.29
Connection4.69
Contribution3.99
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.76
Grading4.24
Reflection4.38
Respect4.43
Creativity4.19
Feedback4.09
Interaction3.98
Challenge4.27
Questions4.07
Xiaoling M Chen 87 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
87 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.42
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.58
Connection4.75
Contribution4.52
Discussion4.39
Inclusivity4.69
Grading3.97
Reflection4.43
Respect4.79
Creativity4.05
Feedback3.71
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.43
Questions4.47
Kevin Michael Mason 93 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
93 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.67
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.34
Collaboration4.49
Connection4.88
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.79
Reflection4.78
Respect4.90
Creativity4.53
Feedback4.68
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.72
Questions4.83
Luca Anna Palasti 39 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.33
Synthesis3.97
Collaboration4.17
Connection4.60
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.83
Grading3.97
Reflection4.43
Respect4.93
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.87
Interaction4.53
Challenge4.30
Questions4.47
Fan Li 9 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.70
Connection5.00
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.80
Reflection5.00
Respect4.90
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Sarah Elaine Posner 101 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
101 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.61
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.85
Contribution4.46
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.77
Grading4.45
Reflection4.70
Respect4.85
Creativity4.22
Feedback4.33
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.52
Questions4.53
Neda Shaban 107 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
107 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology4.49
Synthesis4.48
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.69
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.74
Inclusivity4.86
Grading4.68
Reflection4.70
Respect4.95
Creativity4.58
Feedback4.49
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.63
Questions4.82
Fedor Popov 170 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
170 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.54
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.34
Connection4.74
Contribution4.59
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.40
Reflection4.52
Respect4.80
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.81
Challenge4.54
Questions4.67
Tsering Lhamo 110 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
110 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.42
Synthesis4.12
Collaboration4.34
Connection4.46
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity4.57
Grading4.49
Reflection4.28
Respect4.66
Creativity3.98
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.20
Questions4.33
Nikoo Nikoonazari 5 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.60
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.60
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Jared Taylor 15 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.85
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.75
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.95
Grading4.45
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.55
Questions4.65
Drolma Gadou 145 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
145 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.84
Contribution4.73
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.88
Grading4.71
Reflection4.84
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.62
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.71
Questions4.84
Mallory Sagehorn 56 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
56 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.94
Synthesis4.79
Collaboration4.57
Connection4.85
Contribution4.79
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.94
Grading4.94
Reflection4.62
Respect4.82
Creativity4.86
Feedback4.33
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.78
Questions4.94
Tenzin Yangkey 95 reported responses 4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5
95 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.17
Technology4.21
Synthesis3.98
Collaboration4.24
Connection4.62
Contribution4.33
Discussion4.48
Inclusivity4.47
Grading3.70
Reflection4.25
Respect4.35
Creativity3.87
Feedback3.46
Interaction4.59
Challenge4.02
Questions3.92
Priscilla Corbett 24 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.24
Technology4.81
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration4.79
Connection4.24
Contribution4.33
Discussion4.26
Inclusivity4.91
Grading4.21
Reflection4.24
Respect4.94
Creativity4.42
Feedback4.01
Interaction4.18
Challenge4.24
Questions4.30
Zhe Lin 46 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5
46 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.21
Technology4.36
Synthesis4.02
Collaboration4.21
Connection4.48
Contribution4.39
Discussion4.49
Inclusivity4.45
Grading4.10
Reflection4.27
Respect4.44
Creativity4.06
Feedback3.97
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.11
Questions4.42
Laine Sullivan 67 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
67 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.82
Contribution4.76
Discussion4.86
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.79
Reflection4.79
Respect4.87
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.75
Questions4.92
Matthew Woodland 65 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
65 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.63
Connection4.88
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.94
Grading4.73
Reflection4.79
Respect4.84
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.67
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.72
Questions4.80
Federico Andraderivas 102 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5
102 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.80
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.30
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.50
Questions4.40
Hayes Hart-Thompson 32 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.65
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.75
Reflection4.60
Respect4.85
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Glen Smith 6 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration3.80
Connection5.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.80
Questions4.70
Anshul Rai Sharma 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Maren Roeske 3 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.30
Connection5.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect4.70
Creativity4.70
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.30
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.