Course record GEOG
GEOG 1962
Geographies of Global Change
University of Colorado Boulder
663 grades16 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score13/100
Needs work
William R Travis 663 grades · 1 term 2.83GPA
663 letter grades
4.6% withdrew · 32 of 695 enrolled.
Overall4.05 / 5
191 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.98
Technology4.38
Synthesis3.76
Collaboration3.01
Connection4.65
Contribution3.36
Discussion4.13
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.30
Reflection3.84
Respect4.60
Creativity3.98
Feedback3.83
Interaction3.86
Challenge4.31
Questions4.23
Mara Jill Goldman 142 reported responses 3.90Eval / 5
Overall3.90 / 5
142 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.01
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration3.01
Connection4.70
Contribution3.40
Discussion3.61
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.00
Reflection4.01
Respect4.51
Creativity3.51
Feedback3.01
Interaction3.91
Challenge4.01
Questions4.09
John O'Loughlin 192 reported responses 3.78Eval / 5
Overall3.78 / 5
192 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.98
Technology3.93
Synthesis3.76
Collaboration3.08
Connection4.65
Contribution3.36
Discussion3.50
Inclusivity4.75
Grading3.83
Reflection3.92
Respect4.27
Creativity3.49
Feedback3.12
Interaction3.86
Challenge3.83
Questions3.86
David Antonio Bachrach 17 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.33
Synthesis4.07
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.47
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.47
Inclusivity4.77
Grading4.30
Reflection4.37
Respect4.40
Creativity4.13
Feedback4.37
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.20
Questions4.23
Kripa Dongol 25 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.70
Contribution4.33
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.73
Grading4.50
Reflection4.73
Respect4.60
Creativity4.17
Feedback4.43
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.37
Questions4.60
Prakriti Mukerjee 34 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.87
Technology4.26
Synthesis4.81
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.92
Contribution4.74
Discussion4.54
Inclusivity4.94
Grading4.59
Reflection4.86
Respect4.93
Creativity4.34
Feedback4.16
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.40
Questions4.59
Sarah Elaine Posner 5 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.60
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.00
Connection5.00
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.20
Reflection4.20
Respect4.40
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
Diego Alejandro Melo 12 reported responses 3.86Eval / 5
Overall3.86 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.15
Technology3.81
Synthesis3.95
Collaboration3.23
Connection3.22
Contribution3.66
Discussion3.65
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.27
Reflection4.24
Respect4.37
Creativity3.75
Feedback3.38
Interaction3.75
Challenge3.76
Questions4.01
Jennifer L Fluri 52 reported responses 3.94Eval / 5
Overall3.94 / 5
52 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration3.00
Connection4.50
Contribution3.20
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.10
Reflection3.60
Respect4.70
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.50
Interaction3.70
Challenge4.20
Questions4.30
Priscilla Corbett 20 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.67
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.57
Connection4.83
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.87
Grading4.73
Reflection4.80
Respect4.97
Creativity4.27
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.47
Questions4.80
Aja Procita 21 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.77
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.97
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.60
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.67
Questions4.87
Taneesha Mohan 7 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.54
Technology4.54
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration3.96
Connection4.50
Contribution4.08
Discussion4.01
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.45
Reflection4.55
Respect4.05
Creativity4.05
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.51
Challenge4.54
Questions4.54
Sara Fleming 19 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.67
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.77
Reflection4.57
Respect4.93
Creativity4.23
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.53
Challenge4.33
Questions4.77
Alaric Kothapally 24 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.27
Collaboration4.37
Connection4.80
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.67
Grading4.80
Reflection4.57
Respect4.67
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.17
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.37
Questions4.73
Camden Paillot 11 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.90
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.90
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Naomi Prachi Hazarika 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.