Course record GEOG
GEOG 1001
Our Changing Planet: Climate and Vegetation
University of Colorado Boulder
1,463 grades36 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score41/100
Mixed record
Rachel Elizabeth Isaacs 853 grades · 1 term 3.51GPA
853 letter grades
Compare with the course
Isaacs vs. the course average
A
+6.3
B
−5.2
C
−0.7
D
−0.5
F
+0.2
Difference in percentage points.
1.6% withdrew · 14 of 867 enrolled.
Overall4.11 / 5
243 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.88
Technology4.55
Synthesis3.93
Collaboration3.54
Connection4.44
Contribution3.62
Discussion4.05
Inclusivity3.87
Grading4.21
Reflection4.13
Respect4.50
Creativity3.82
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.29
Challenge4.06
Questions4.60
Mark Serreze 467 grades · 1 term 3.36GPA
467 letter grades
Compare with the course
Serreze vs. the course average
A
−8.5
B
+7.2
C
+0.4
D
+1.2
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
1.9% withdrew · 9 of 476 enrolled.
Overall4.29 / 5
122 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.17
Collaboration3.67
Connection4.82
Contribution4.17
Discussion4.41
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.39
Reflection4.49
Respect4.67
Creativity4.22
Feedback3.88
Interaction4.37
Challenge4.54
Questions4.58
Noah Paul Molotch 143 grades · 1 term 3.32GPA
143 letter grades
Compare with the course
Molotch vs. the course average
A
−9.8
B
+7.9
C
+3.0
D
−0.7
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
2.7% withdrew · 4 of 147 enrolled.
Overall3.96 / 5
45 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.50
Contribution3.40
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.20
Reflection4.10
Respect4.50
Creativity3.40
Feedback3.30
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.10
Questions4.30
Natasha Louise Harvey 102 reported responses 4.18Eval / 5
Overall4.18 / 5
102 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.11
Technology4.62
Synthesis3.83
Collaboration3.59
Connection4.55
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.49
Inclusivity3.77
Grading4.53
Reflection4.29
Respect4.62
Creativity4.16
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.48
Challenge4.17
Questions4.76
Meghan Nicole Helmberger 116 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5
116 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.48
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration3.63
Connection4.61
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.08
Inclusivity4.18
Grading4.57
Reflection4.52
Respect4.64
Creativity4.26
Feedback4.24
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.37
Questions4.85
Steven Paul Welter 76 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5
76 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.74
Technology4.64
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.15
Connection4.76
Contribution4.64
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.36
Grading4.50
Reflection4.60
Respect4.73
Creativity4.34
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.51
Challenge4.68
Questions4.61
Nayoung Joyce Hur 13 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.00
Contribution4.60
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.90
Reflection4.55
Respect4.70
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Sade Kylah Cromratie Clemons 12 reported responses 3.79Eval / 5
Overall3.79 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.25
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration3.50
Connection3.85
Contribution3.85
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity4.05
Grading3.85
Reflection3.95
Respect4.30
Creativity3.60
Feedback3.40
Interaction3.60
Challenge3.90
Questions4.65
Jeffrey Scott Schmidt 15 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.43
Connection4.53
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.87
Grading4.37
Reflection4.33
Respect4.40
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.13
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.47
Questions4.67
Katarena Angelik Matos 16 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.23
Connection4.57
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.63
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.33
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.50
Questions4.87
Sarah Elaine Posner 15 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.43
Technology4.24
Synthesis3.47
Collaboration4.14
Connection3.41
Contribution4.53
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.19
Reflection3.83
Respect4.29
Creativity3.73
Feedback2.73
Interaction4.61
Challenge4.22
Questions3.82
Prakriti Mukerjee 3 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.62
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration3.85
Connection3.23
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.23
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.46
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.23
Feedback2.69
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions2.31
Teresa Bowers Chapman 8 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.87
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.87
Collaboration4.81
Connection4.94
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.94
Inclusivity4.94
Grading4.51
Reflection4.81
Respect4.76
Creativity4.94
Feedback4.81
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.68
Questions4.76
Millie Spencer 21 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.43
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.33
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.03
Grading4.63
Reflection4.60
Respect4.63
Creativity3.87
Feedback4.33
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.47
Questions4.33
Briana Prado 34 reported responses 4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.21
Technology4.27
Synthesis3.98
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.17
Contribution4.04
Discussion4.27
Inclusivity3.75
Grading3.95
Reflection4.19
Respect4.64
Creativity4.41
Feedback4.33
Interaction4.52
Challenge4.17
Questions4.50
Emma Loizeaux 10 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration4.45
Connection4.40
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.55
Reflection4.45
Respect4.85
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.40
Questions4.85
Rahila Yilangai 39 reported responses 3.94Eval / 5
Overall3.94 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.66
Technology4.31
Synthesis3.73
Collaboration4.26
Connection4.07
Contribution3.81
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity3.67
Grading3.66
Reflection4.02
Respect4.47
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.31
Interaction4.42
Challenge3.91
Questions4.22
Jiacheng Zhou 6 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.95
Technology4.84
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration4.84
Connection4.93
Contribution4.93
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.93
Grading4.84
Reflection4.84
Respect4.93
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.93
Questions4.77
Paresha Farastu 18 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.35
Connection4.75
Contribution3.85
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.50
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.50
Questions4.95
Zaria Cast 23 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.68
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.60
Contribution4.12
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.52
Grading4.60
Reflection4.42
Respect4.89
Creativity4.21
Feedback4.31
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.39
Questions4.92
Zhou Yu 13 reported responses 3.84Eval / 5
Overall3.84 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology2.74
Synthesis3.12
Collaboration4.06
Connection3.73
Contribution4.05
Discussion2.72
Inclusivity4.17
Grading2.58
Reflection4.11
Respect4.60
Creativity2.41
Feedback2.52
Interaction4.26
Challenge2.58
Questions2.80
Behzad Vahedi Torghabeh 5 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.80
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.20
Respect4.20
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.20
Questions4.60
Charles Ferrer 32 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.98
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration4.72
Connection4.65
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.56
Grading4.93
Reflection4.75
Respect4.96
Creativity4.37
Feedback4.68
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.62
Questions4.98
Lars Schwaebe 13 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.75
Contribution3.85
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.65
Reflection4.45
Respect4.85
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.35
Questions4.60
Esmee Mulder 11 reported responses 4.97Eval / 5
Overall4.97 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.95
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.90
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.90
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.75
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.95
Questions5.00
Bharat Rastogi 48 reported responses 3.36Eval / 5
Overall3.36 / 5
48 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.30
Technology3.70
Synthesis3.20
Collaboration3.00
Connection4.10
Contribution3.30
Discussion3.60
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.10
Reflection3.40
Respect4.10
Creativity3.10
Feedback2.70
Interaction3.70
Challenge3.50
Questions3.50
Trishala Thakur 7 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.60
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.10
Reflection4.60
Respect4.70
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.40
Questions4.60
Caleb Cullen 17 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.80
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.50
Reflection4.55
Respect4.65
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.40
Questions4.65
Ethan Carr 14 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.52
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.72
Contribution4.48
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity4.77
Grading4.27
Reflection4.75
Respect4.72
Creativity4.48
Feedback4.29
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.68
Questions4.57
Preston Cumming 74 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
74 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.41
Collaboration4.05
Connection4.83
Contribution4.28
Discussion4.58
Inclusivity4.53
Grading4.55
Reflection4.48
Respect4.80
Creativity4.22
Feedback4.08
Interaction4.58
Challenge4.43
Questions4.60
Ximeng Huang 15 reported responses 4.00Eval / 5
Overall4.00 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.97
Technology4.20
Synthesis3.57
Collaboration3.53
Connection4.37
Contribution3.17
Discussion3.97
Inclusivity4.17
Grading3.87
Reflection3.97
Respect4.47
Creativity4.13
Feedback3.87
Interaction4.47
Challenge3.93
Questions4.23
Emily Nagamoto 34 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.51
Technology4.84
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.82
Connection4.78
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.74
Inclusivity4.22
Grading4.54
Reflection4.66
Respect4.87
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.21
Interaction4.81
Challenge4.63
Questions4.85
Kirk Stueve 13 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.68
Technology3.99
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.29
Connection4.52
Contribution4.66
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.52
Grading4.60
Reflection4.58
Respect4.88
Creativity3.85
Feedback3.68
Interaction4.62
Challenge4.62
Questions4.91
Hayden Bernard 22 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.53
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.37
Inclusivity4.47
Grading4.63
Reflection4.23
Respect4.90
Creativity4.07
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.37
Questions4.90
Gretchen Lang 2 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Sherrie Liu 3 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.70
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.70
Reflection5.00
Respect4.70
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.