Course record FREN
FREN 1020
Beginning French 2
University of Colorado Boulder
499 grades19 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score46/100
Mixed record
Israel James Wheatley 30 grades · 1 term 3.91GPA
30 letter grades
Compare with the course
Wheatley vs. the course average
A
+45.5
B
−24.1
C
−16.8
D
−2.2
F
−2.4
Difference in percentage points.
6.3% withdrew · 2 of 32 enrolled.
Overall4.90 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.73
Collaboration4.82
Connection4.80
Contribution4.85
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.95
Grading4.80
Reflection4.95
Respect4.98
Creativity4.95
Feedback4.98
Interaction4.98
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Kevin Medhi Jacques Drif 28 grades · 1 term 3.78GPA
28 letter grades
Compare with the course
Drif vs. the course average
A
+41.2
B
−26.9
C
−9.7
D
−2.2
F
−2.4
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 28 enrolled.
Overall4.77 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.04
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.21
Collaboration4.88
Connection3.98
Contribution4.66
Discussion4.96
Inclusivity4.36
Grading4.86
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.77
Questions5.00
Miranda P Paikowski 26 grades · 1 term 3.35GPA
26 letter grades
Compare with the course
Paikowski vs. the course average
A
+17.0
B
−7.1
C
−5.3
D
−2.2
F
−2.4
Difference in percentage points.
7.1% withdrew · 2 of 28 enrolled.
Overall4.85 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.78
Contribution4.65
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.85
Reflection4.88
Respect4.92
Creativity4.46
Feedback4.72
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.92
Questions5.00
Ayelen Costa 31 grades · 1 term 3.33GPA
31 letter grades
Compare with the course
Costa vs. the course average
A
+3.9
B
+4.6
C
−3.9
D
−2.2
F
−2.4
Difference in percentage points.
8.8% withdrew · 3 of 34 enrolled.
Overall4.72 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration4.82
Connection4.55
Contribution4.68
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.85
Reflection4.78
Respect4.88
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.72
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.55
Questions5.00
Florent Philippe Rethore 26 grades · 1 term 3.29GPA
26 letter grades
Compare with the course
Rethore vs. the course average
A
+1.7
B
+8.2
C
−5.3
D
−2.2
F
−2.4
Difference in percentage points.
10.3% withdrew · 3 of 29 enrolled.
Overall4.39 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.42
Technology4.62
Synthesis3.78
Collaboration4.78
Connection3.55
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity3.06
Grading4.06
Reflection4.25
Respect4.52
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.47
Questions4.72
Lydia Jean Hoffman 30 grades · 1 term 3.17GPA
30 letter grades
Compare with the course
Hoffman vs. the course average
A
+2.2
B
+5.9
C
−10.2
D
−2.2
F
+4.3
Difference in percentage points.
3.2% withdrew · 1 of 31 enrolled.
Overall4.64 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.13
Technology4.69
Synthesis4.36
Collaboration4.88
Connection4.26
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.32
Grading4.80
Reflection4.65
Respect4.73
Creativity4.58
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.85
Laurie Ann Rech 99 grades · 1 term 3.00GPA
99 letter grades
Compare with the course
Rech vs. the course average
A
−7.1
B
+0.3
C
+3.4
D
+3.9
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
3.9% withdrew · 4 of 103 enrolled.
Overall4.88 / 5
106 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.91
Synthesis4.86
Collaboration4.92
Connection4.66
Contribution4.83
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.81
Grading4.84
Reflection4.84
Respect4.99
Creativity4.76
Feedback4.99
Interaction4.91
Challenge5.00
Questions4.93
Sandrine Florence Vandermarliere 99 grades · 1 term 2.97GPA
99 letter grades
Compare with the course
Vandermarliere vs. the course average
A
−11.2
B
+6.3
C
+5.4
D
−0.2
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
2.9% withdrew · 3 of 102 enrolled.
Overall4.68 / 5
83 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.04
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.09
Collaboration4.89
Connection4.21
Contribution4.37
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity4.44
Grading4.77
Reflection4.71
Respect4.82
Creativity4.64
Feedback4.89
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.85
Questions4.88
Sara Fischer 31 grades · 1 term 2.84GPA
31 letter grades
Compare with the course
Fischer vs. the course average
A
−15.5
B
+4.6
C
+12.2
D
−2.2
F
+0.8
Difference in percentage points.
6.1% withdrew · 2 of 33 enrolled.
Overall4.67 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.27
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.14
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.32
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.52
Inclusivity4.28
Grading4.60
Reflection4.72
Respect4.75
Creativity4.68
Feedback4.37
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.75
Questions4.65
Juliette J Andre 33 grades · 1 term 2.68GPA
33 letter grades
Compare with the course
Andre vs. the course average
A
−14.2
B
+5.3
C
+1.3
D
+0.8
F
+6.7
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 33 enrolled.
Overall4.74 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.32
Collaboration4.36
Connection4.72
Contribution4.34
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.29
Grading4.78
Reflection4.59
Respect4.77
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.92
Interaction4.62
Challenge4.72
Questions4.85
Keenan B Brown 13 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.32GPA
13 letter grades · Limited sample
7.1% withdrew · 1 of 14 enrolled.
Hope Dolores Hecht 15 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.21GPA
15 letter grades · Limited sample
11.8% withdrew · 2 of 17 enrolled.
Overall4.96 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.90
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Colleen P Dunne 18 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 2.95GPA
18 letter grades · Limited sample
5.3% withdrew · 1 of 19 enrolled.
Ismael Ichola 20 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 2.48GPA
20 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 20 enrolled.
Emily E Martin 4 reported responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology3.00
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.30
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.00
Respect4.80
Creativity3.50
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge3.80
Questions5.00
Niloofar Sarhadi 20 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.64
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.03
Collaboration4.92
Connection4.25
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.56
Grading4.33
Reflection4.60
Respect4.98
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.62
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.50
Questions4.95
Audrey Burba 30 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration4.67
Connection4.75
Contribution4.78
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.47
Grading4.80
Reflection4.82
Respect4.82
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.92
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.92
Questions4.90
Sophie Rose 43 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
43 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.32
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.48
Connection4.29
Contribution4.64
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity4.29
Grading4.54
Reflection4.34
Respect4.59
Creativity4.58
Feedback4.51
Interaction4.71
Challenge4.69
Questions4.71
Ernest Baloka Ngong 7 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.80
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.40
Reflection4.90
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.