Course record FNCE
FNCE 3010
Corporate Finance
University of Colorado Boulder
2,586 grades17 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score18/100
Needs work
Ellen Burnes 149 grades · 1 term 3.28GPA
149 letter grades
Compare with the course
Burnes vs. the course average
A
+19.9
B
−2.9
C
−15.8
D
−1.1
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
1.3% withdrew · 2 of 151 enrolled.
Overall3.91 / 5
120 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology3.87
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.87
Connection4.01
Contribution3.66
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity4.02
Grading3.95
Reflection3.96
Respect4.45
Creativity3.84
Feedback3.44
Interaction4.25
Challenge3.98
Questions4.09
Jeffrey C Merrell 223 grades · 1 term 3.04GPA
223 letter grades
Compare with the course
Merrell vs. the course average
A
+7.3
B
−2.3
C
−3.7
D
−1.5
F
+0.3
Difference in percentage points.
1.3% withdrew · 3 of 226 enrolled.
Overall4.57 / 5
50 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.90
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.70
Reflection4.45
Respect4.85
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.65
Questions4.85
David Michael Gross 71 grades · 1 term 3.03GPA
71 letter grades
Compare with the course
Gross vs. the course average
A
+0.4
B
+6.3
C
−5.5
D
−1.0
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 71 enrolled.
Overall4.36 / 5
67 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.28
Technology4.59
Synthesis4.08
Collaboration3.16
Connection4.58
Contribution3.53
Discussion4.09
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.62
Reflection4.32
Respect4.64
Creativity4.24
Feedback3.58
Interaction4.17
Challenge4.46
Questions4.59
Andrea Buffa 523 grades · 1 term 3.00GPA
523 letter grades
Compare with the course
Buffa vs. the course average
A
−4.4
B
+11.3
C
−6.3
D
−0.3
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
0.9% withdrew · 5 of 528 enrolled.
Overall4.11 / 5
222 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.43
Synthesis3.94
Collaboration3.76
Connection4.03
Contribution3.97
Discussion4.48
Inclusivity4.09
Grading4.17
Reflection4.16
Respect4.73
Creativity3.79
Feedback3.54
Interaction4.59
Challenge4.26
Questions4.62
Edward D Van Wesep 95 grades · 1 term 3.00GPA
95 letter grades
Compare with the course
Wesep vs. the course average
A
−5.3
B
+14.2
C
−4.9
D
−2.4
F
−1.5
Difference in percentage points.
1.0% withdrew · 1 of 96 enrolled.
Overall4.39 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration3.45
Connection5.00
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.75
Reflection4.35
Respect4.55
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.35
Challenge4.40
Questions4.90
Nathan Walcott 149 grades · 1 term 2.99GPA
149 letter grades
Compare with the course
Walcott vs. the course average
A
+7.9
B
−3.5
C
−6.4
D
−0.4
F
+2.5
Difference in percentage points.
2.6% withdrew · 4 of 153 enrolled.
Overall3.62 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.87
Technology3.53
Synthesis3.53
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.20
Contribution3.77
Discussion3.87
Inclusivity3.30
Grading3.27
Reflection3.60
Respect3.90
Creativity3.70
Feedback2.97
Interaction3.90
Challenge3.73
Questions3.63
Asaf Bernstein 442 grades · 1 term 2.97GPA
442 letter grades
Compare with the course
Bernstein vs. the course average
A
+2.1
B
−1.3
C
+1.5
D
−1.8
F
−0.6
Difference in percentage points.
1.8% withdrew · 8 of 450 enrolled.
Overall4.46 / 5
263 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.71
Synthesis4.42
Collaboration3.81
Connection4.65
Contribution4.51
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.26
Grading4.68
Reflection4.63
Respect4.85
Creativity4.24
Feedback4.37
Interaction4.59
Challenge4.65
Questions4.75
Craig A Stephenson 150 grades · 1 term 2.91GPA
150 letter grades
Compare with the course
Stephenson vs. the course average
A
−5.7
B
+0.8
C
+8.8
D
−2.4
F
−1.5
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 150 enrolled.
Overall4.75 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.53
Connection4.87
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.70
Reflection4.73
Respect4.80
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Beverly Benita Karns 133 grades · 1 term 2.83GPA
133 letter grades
Compare with the course
Karns vs. the course average
A
−3.1
B
−3.7
C
+7.0
D
+1.3
F
−1.5
Difference in percentage points.
1.5% withdrew · 2 of 135 enrolled.
Overall4.52 / 5
207 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.56
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.74
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.22
Grading4.62
Reflection4.65
Respect4.59
Creativity4.54
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.51
Challenge4.76
Questions4.60
Jaime Zender 73 grades · 1 term 2.81GPA
73 letter grades
Compare with the course
Zender vs. the course average
A
−7.2
B
+0.8
C
+10.4
D
−2.4
F
−1.5
Difference in percentage points.
3.9% withdrew · 3 of 76 enrolled.
Overall4.33 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.20
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.95
Grading4.45
Reflection4.40
Respect4.95
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.35
Questions4.90
Robert M Donchez 578 grades · 1 term 2.66GPA
578 letter grades
Compare with the course
Donchez vs. the course average
A
−3.7
B
−9.3
C
+8.0
D
+3.8
F
+1.3
Difference in percentage points.
3.2% withdrew · 19 of 597 enrolled.
Overall4.02 / 5
346 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology3.28
Synthesis3.63
Collaboration3.17
Connection4.43
Contribution3.87
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.32
Grading3.57
Reflection4.01
Respect3.93
Creativity3.18
Feedback3.15
Interaction3.92
Challenge4.24
Questions4.02
Thomas Harrison Nelson 7 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.90
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.60
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.60
Thomas Cavett Nelson 7 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.90
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.60
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.60
Michael P Jennings 10 reported responses 4.97Eval / 5
Overall4.97 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.87
Technology4.87
Synthesis4.87
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.94
Inclusivity4.87
Grading5.00
Reflection4.94
Respect4.94
Creativity4.87
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.87
Challenge5.00
Questions4.94
Boyu Shen 37 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.09
Collaboration3.08
Connection4.80
Contribution3.95
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.93
Reflection4.78
Respect4.95
Creativity4.63
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.25
Challenge4.93
Questions4.95
Xiaobo Yu 304 reported responses 3.15Eval / 5
Overall3.15 / 5
304 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.22
Technology3.43
Synthesis3.10
Collaboration2.64
Connection3.52
Contribution3.10
Discussion3.63
Inclusivity2.96
Grading3.47
Reflection3.17
Respect4.01
Creativity3.08
Feedback2.77
Interaction3.64
Challenge3.39
Questions3.74
Robert Bruskotter 19 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.60
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.60
Reflection4.50
Respect4.60
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.50
Questions4.70
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.