Course record ETHN
ETHN 3024
Introduction to Critical Sports Studies
University of Colorado Boulder
1,376 grades17 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score48/100
Mixed record
Nicholas Villanueva 734 grades · 1 term 3.63GPA
734 letter grades
Compare with the course
Villanueva vs. the course average
A
+12.0
B
−10.6
C
−1.5
D
same
F
+0.1
Difference in percentage points.
0.9% withdrew · 7 of 741 enrolled.
Overall4.26 / 5
225 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.07
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration3.68
Connection4.70
Contribution4.07
Discussion4.46
Inclusivity4.69
Grading4.14
Reflection4.41
Respect4.83
Creativity4.13
Feedback3.86
Interaction4.34
Challenge4.43
Questions4.20
Jared Bahir Browsh 642 grades · 1 term 3.40GPA
642 letter grades
Compare with the course
Browsh vs. the course average
A
−13.7
B
+12.1
C
+1.7
D
same
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
1.2% withdrew · 8 of 650 enrolled.
Overall4.20 / 5
209 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.31
Technology4.36
Synthesis4.29
Collaboration3.64
Connection4.59
Contribution3.87
Discussion4.11
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.09
Reflection4.17
Respect4.58
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.11
Questions4.16
Jose Vasquez Zarate 121 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
121 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.71
Technology4.61
Synthesis4.66
Collaboration4.34
Connection4.75
Contribution4.61
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.77
Grading4.49
Reflection4.55
Respect4.71
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.61
Challenge4.68
Questions4.60
Abraham Salvador-Jones 18 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.35
Connection4.80
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.10
Reflection4.65
Respect4.90
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.40
Wayne Martin Freeman 27 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.66
Synthesis4.56
Collaboration3.77
Connection4.62
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.61
Inclusivity4.84
Grading4.40
Reflection4.65
Respect4.84
Creativity4.63
Feedback4.47
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.57
Questions4.70
Alexandra Portillos 44 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
44 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.61
Collaboration4.64
Connection4.87
Contribution4.48
Discussion4.86
Inclusivity4.78
Grading4.32
Reflection4.79
Respect4.77
Creativity4.54
Feedback4.67
Interaction4.76
Challenge4.82
Questions4.79
Natasha Myhal 11 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.60
Reflection4.50
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
Jacqueline Mora Manzo 28 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.78
Collaboration4.74
Connection4.84
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity4.92
Grading4.58
Reflection4.86
Respect4.90
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.54
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.71
Questions4.74
Raquel Hernandez Guerrero 69 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5
69 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.09
Technology4.09
Synthesis4.22
Collaboration4.01
Connection4.09
Contribution4.07
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity4.29
Grading3.92
Reflection4.10
Respect4.12
Creativity3.91
Feedback4.03
Interaction4.09
Challenge4.06
Questions4.06
Alejandra B Portillos 160 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
160 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.81
Technology4.22
Synthesis4.17
Collaboration3.82
Connection4.83
Contribution4.16
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.91
Grading4.71
Reflection4.25
Respect4.36
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.21
Questions4.76
Matthew Gee 35 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
35 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.59
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration4.25
Connection4.97
Contribution4.83
Discussion4.84
Inclusivity4.96
Grading4.13
Reflection4.75
Respect4.86
Creativity4.44
Feedback4.23
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.60
Questions4.69
Julia Popham 20 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.85
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.38
Reflection4.75
Respect4.95
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Marissa Zamudio 32 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.76
Technology4.66
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.81
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.74
Inclusivity4.95
Grading4.55
Reflection4.65
Respect4.83
Creativity4.61
Feedback4.54
Interaction4.81
Challenge4.52
Questions4.73
Sydney Neal 33 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.48
Synthesis4.21
Collaboration4.38
Connection4.44
Contribution4.36
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.48
Grading4.33
Reflection4.50
Respect4.52
Creativity4.22
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.40
Questions4.46
Asher Firestone 39 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.54
Connection4.42
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.92
Grading4.45
Reflection4.84
Respect4.78
Creativity4.41
Feedback3.29
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.68
Questions4.82
Lien Amin 16 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.95
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.60
Reflection4.85
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Dena Saleh 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.