Course record ENVS
ENVS 4800
Capstone: Critical Thinking in Environmental Studies
University of Colorado Boulder
757 grades18 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score70/100
Strong
Sharon Kay Collinge 28 grades · 1 term 3.86GPA
28 letter grades
Compare with the course
Collinge vs. the course average
A
+22.5
B
−20.7
C
−3.2
D
−0.5
F
+2.0
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 28 enrolled.
Overall4.83 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.90
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Lisa Dilling 63 grades · 1 term 3.83GPA
63 letter grades
Compare with the course
Dilling vs. the course average
A
+13.3
B
−8.0
C
−3.2
D
−0.5
F
−1.6
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 63 enrolled.
Overall4.91 / 5
56 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.71
Connection5.00
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.80
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Karen Bailey 97 grades · 1 term 3.82GPA
97 letter grades
Compare with the course
Bailey vs. the course average
A
+15.7
B
−12.5
C
−2.1
D
−0.5
F
−0.6
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 97 enrolled.
Overall4.75 / 5
82 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.89
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.92
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.74
Reflection4.82
Respect4.92
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.92
Carlo Salvinelli 35 grades · 1 term 3.79GPA
35 letter grades
Compare with the course
Salvinelli vs. the course average
A
+11.7
B
−9.3
C
−0.3
D
−0.5
F
−1.6
Difference in percentage points.
7.9% withdrew · 3 of 38 enrolled.
Overall4.36 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.70
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.75
Grading3.75
Reflection4.35
Respect4.65
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.35
Questions4.25
David Ciplet 63 grades · 1 term 3.71GPA
63 letter grades
Compare with the course
Ciplet vs. the course average
A
+10.2
B
−11.2
C
+1.6
D
+1.1
F
−1.6
Difference in percentage points.
4.5% withdrew · 3 of 66 enrolled.
Overall4.62 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.34
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.28
Collaboration2.57
Connection5.00
Contribution4.84
Discussion3.82
Inclusivity4.92
Grading4.78
Reflection4.90
Respect4.91
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.78
Interaction2.58
Challenge4.84
Questions4.85
Roger A Pielke Jr. 76 grades · 1 term 3.66GPA
76 letter grades
Compare with the course
Jr. vs. the course average
A
−4.2
B
+8.2
C
−1.9
D
−0.5
F
−1.6
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 76 enrolled.
Overall4.78 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.54
Synthesis4.82
Collaboration4.08
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.82
Grading3.87
Reflection5.00
Respect4.81
Creativity4.53
Feedback4.71
Interaction4.82
Challenge5.00
Questions4.72
Carrie Anne Vodehnal 72 grades · 1 term 3.63GPA
72 letter grades
Compare with the course
Vodehnal vs. the course average
A
+1.0
B
+0.1
C
−0.4
D
−0.5
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 72 enrolled.
Overall4.58 / 5
54 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.74
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.95
Contribution4.56
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.81
Grading4.47
Reflection4.59
Respect4.88
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.37
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.82
Questions4.79
Zia Mehrabi 60 grades · 1 term 3.63GPA
60 letter grades
Compare with the course
Mehrabi vs. the course average
A
+2.7
B
−2.4
C
−1.5
D
+1.1
F
+0.1
Difference in percentage points.
6.3% withdrew · 4 of 64 enrolled.
Overall4.80 / 5
54 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology4.79
Synthesis4.93
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.92
Contribution4.88
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity4.89
Grading4.70
Reflection4.71
Respect4.86
Creativity4.88
Feedback4.72
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.88
Questions4.69
Jill S. Litt 35 grades · 1 term 3.50GPA
35 letter grades
Compare with the course
Litt vs. the course average
A
−19.7
B
+19.3
C
+2.5
D
−0.5
F
−1.6
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 35 enrolled.
Overall4.66 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.70
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.60
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.60
Questions4.70
Denis Macharia Muthike 26 grades · 1 term 3.43GPA
26 letter grades
Compare with the course
Muthike vs. the course average
A
−24.0
B
+25.4
C
+0.7
D
−0.5
F
−1.6
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 26 enrolled.
Overall4.55 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.90
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.20
Reflection4.40
Respect4.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Benjamin Slater Hale 51 grades · 1 term 3.37GPA
51 letter grades
Compare with the course
Hale vs. the course average
A
−15.2
B
+8.7
C
+4.7
D
−0.5
F
+2.3
Difference in percentage points.
1.9% withdrew · 1 of 52 enrolled.
Overall4.66 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.98
Collaboration4.98
Connection5.00
Contribution4.98
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.96
Grading4.70
Reflection4.98
Respect5.00
Creativity4.96
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.98
Cassandra Brooks 58 grades · 1 term 3.36GPA
58 letter grades
Compare with the course
Brooks vs. the course average
A
−15.4
B
+10.3
C
+2.0
D
+1.2
F
+1.9
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 58 enrolled.
Overall4.77 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.90
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.60
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Jeremiah David Osborne-Gowey 51 grades · 1 term 3.27GPA
51 letter grades
Compare with the course
Osborne-Gowey vs. the course average
A
−13.2
B
+2.8
C
+4.7
D
+1.4
F
+4.3
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 51 enrolled.
Overall4.45 / 5
43 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.12
Technology4.41
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration4.33
Connection4.45
Contribution4.62
Discussion4.47
Inclusivity4.10
Grading3.92
Reflection4.63
Respect4.80
Creativity4.32
Feedback4.28
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.41
Questions4.32
Joel N Hartter 18 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.63GPA
18 letter grades · Limited sample
5.3% withdrew · 1 of 19 enrolled.
Overall4.65 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.87
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.87
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.98
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.66
Grading4.57
Reflection4.66
Respect4.76
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.98
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.76
Questions4.87
Peter Newton 24 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.49GPA
24 letter grades · Limited sample
4.0% withdrew · 1 of 25 enrolled.
Overall4.83 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.72
Collaboration4.99
Connection4.91
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.82
Reflection4.90
Respect4.91
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.24
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.81
Questions4.72
Riley Edward Mulhern 31 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.95
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.83
Collaboration4.58
Connection5.00
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.83
Grading4.67
Reflection4.88
Respect4.95
Creativity4.93
Feedback4.88
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.98
Questions4.82
Isaiah Lyons-Galante 15 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.90
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.70
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Diane Marie Mcknight 2 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.50
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.