Course record ENVS
ENVS 3525
Intermediate Environmental Problem Analysis: Topical Cornerstones
University of Colorado Boulder
709 grades14 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score66/100
Strong
Gregor Allen Macgregor 29 grades · 1 term 3.84GPA
29 letter grades
Compare with the course
Macgregor vs. the course average
A
+11.8
B
−5.7
C
−3.8
D
−1.0
F
−1.3
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 29 enrolled.
Overall4.47 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.80
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.80
Grading3.80
Reflection4.40
Respect4.90
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.20
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions4.30
Denise Fernandes 70 grades · 1 term 3.71GPA
70 letter grades
Compare with the course
Fernandes vs. the course average
A
+0.7
B
+2.5
C
−1.0
D
−1.0
F
−1.3
Difference in percentage points.
5.4% withdrew · 4 of 74 enrolled.
Overall4.70 / 5
46 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.93
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.78
Connection4.90
Contribution4.78
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.32
Reflection4.98
Respect4.98
Creativity4.42
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.88
Questions4.78
Peter Newton 142 grades · 1 term 3.69GPA
142 letter grades
Compare with the course
Newton vs. the course average
A
+6.7
B
−4.8
C
−1.7
D
−1.0
F
+0.8
Difference in percentage points.
2.1% withdrew · 3 of 145 enrolled.
Overall4.61 / 5
82 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.71
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.78
Connection4.90
Contribution4.61
Discussion4.71
Inclusivity4.51
Grading4.32
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.71
Feedback4.11
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.61
Questions4.71
Carrie Anne Vodehnal 140 grades · 1 term 3.61GPA
140 letter grades
Compare with the course
Vodehnal vs. the course average
A
−2.9
B
+1.1
C
+1.9
D
+0.4
F
−0.6
Difference in percentage points.
1.4% withdrew · 2 of 142 enrolled.
Overall4.25 / 5
35 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.16
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration3.68
Connection4.15
Contribution3.66
Discussion4.06
Inclusivity4.06
Grading3.97
Reflection4.05
Respect4.34
Creativity4.03
Feedback3.69
Interaction4.34
Challenge4.03
Questions4.40
Steven Miller 138 grades · 1 term 3.61GPA
138 letter grades
Compare with the course
Miller vs. the course average
A
−2.5
B
+0.6
C
−0.2
D
+1.9
F
+0.2
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 138 enrolled.
Overall4.79 / 5
41 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.79
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.79
Collaboration4.98
Connection5.00
Contribution4.79
Discussion4.99
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.88
Reflection4.78
Respect4.90
Creativity4.88
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.78
Questions4.99
Joanna E Lambert 90 grades · 1 term 3.61GPA
90 letter grades
Compare with the course
Lambert vs. the course average
A
−7.9
B
+9.5
C
−1.6
D
+0.1
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
2.2% withdrew · 2 of 92 enrolled.
Overall4.47 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration3.82
Connection4.88
Contribution4.41
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.56
Grading4.57
Reflection4.60
Respect4.75
Creativity4.58
Feedback3.99
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.61
Questions4.53
Kyungsun Lee 51 grades · 1 term 3.59GPA
51 letter grades
Compare with the course
Lee vs. the course average
A
+4.5
B
−12.2
C
+6.0
D
−1.0
F
+2.7
Difference in percentage points.
1.9% withdrew · 1 of 52 enrolled.
Overall4.73 / 5
46 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.68
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.58
Collaboration4.78
Connection4.78
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.65
Reflection4.58
Respect4.92
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.62
Questions4.88
Jill S. Litt 34 grades · 1 term 3.54GPA
34 letter grades
Compare with the course
Litt vs. the course average
A
−7.3
B
+7.5
C
+2.1
D
−1.0
F
−1.3
Difference in percentage points.
2.9% withdrew · 1 of 35 enrolled.
Overall4.65 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.70
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.30
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Joel N Hartter 15 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.77GPA
15 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 15 enrolled.
Overall4.68 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.54
Synthesis4.77
Collaboration4.71
Connection4.86
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.71
Inclusivity4.63
Grading4.24
Reflection4.54
Respect4.70
Creativity4.51
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.67
Questions4.51
Vodehnal Anne Carrie 39 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.71
Technology4.41
Synthesis4.51
Collaboration4.41
Connection4.71
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity4.54
Grading4.12
Reflection4.41
Respect4.90
Creativity4.48
Feedback3.63
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.45
Questions4.82
Ryan Elman Langendorf 40 reported responses 4.93Eval / 5
Overall4.93 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.96
Synthesis4.98
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.93
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.87
Grading4.96
Reflection4.95
Respect4.98
Creativity4.94
Feedback4.94
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.95
Questions5.00
Benjamin Slater Hale 5 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology2.50
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.60
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.40
Grading3.80
Reflection5.00
Respect4.60
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge5.00
Questions4.60
Samina Islam 6 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.69
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.69
Collaboration4.31
Connection4.88
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.19
Inclusivity4.88
Grading4.88
Reflection4.69
Respect4.62
Creativity4.81
Feedback4.31
Interaction4.38
Challenge4.50
Questions4.63
Karen Bailey 19 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.80
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.20
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.