Course record ENVM
ENVM 6100
Special Topics for Master of the Environment Program
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable53 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score47/100
Mixed record
George Gregory Deriso 32 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.29
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.49
Collaboration4.72
Connection4.75
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.69
Inclusivity4.49
Grading3.74
Reflection4.11
Respect4.67
Creativity4.42
Feedback3.88
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.42
Questions4.82
Fatuma Emmad 32 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology4.79
Synthesis4.54
Collaboration4.46
Connection4.92
Contribution4.93
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.29
Reflection4.92
Respect4.96
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.26
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.96
Questions4.70
Todd A Bryan 12 reported responses 3.54Eval / 5
Overall3.54 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.62
Technology3.30
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration3.46
Connection3.77
Contribution3.38
Discussion3.30
Inclusivity3.54
Grading2.80
Reflection3.54
Respect4.00
Creativity3.00
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.38
Challenge3.30
Questions4.40
Joel N Hartter 25 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.02
Technology3.92
Synthesis4.02
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.46
Contribution4.46
Discussion4.37
Inclusivity3.75
Grading3.38
Reflection4.10
Respect3.99
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.30
Interaction4.55
Challenge3.92
Questions3.39
Benjamin Andrew Webster 9 reported responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.60
Reflection5.00
Respect4.90
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Joseph Henry Casola 17 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.98
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.83
Collaboration4.58
Connection4.90
Contribution4.82
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.49
Grading4.82
Reflection4.67
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.92
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.77
Questions4.90
Gretel Follingstad 23 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.67
Technology4.91
Synthesis4.36
Collaboration4.42
Connection4.69
Contribution4.93
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.17
Grading4.78
Reflection4.74
Respect4.76
Creativity4.37
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.65
Questions4.85
George Gergory Deriso 32 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.29
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.49
Collaboration4.72
Connection4.75
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.69
Inclusivity4.49
Grading3.74
Reflection4.11
Respect4.67
Creativity4.42
Feedback3.88
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.42
Questions4.82
Jean P Robbins 10 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.60
Connection5.00
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.60
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.30
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.60
William Andrew Shutkin 42 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
42 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.69
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.51
Collaboration4.67
Connection5.00
Contribution4.88
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.88
Grading4.58
Reflection4.29
Respect4.99
Creativity4.58
Feedback4.42
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.78
Questions4.90
Sophie Cecile Mckee 28 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.88
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.22
Contribution4.17
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity3.21
Grading4.35
Reflection4.41
Respect4.62
Creativity4.49
Feedback4.09
Interaction4.58
Challenge4.55
Questions4.59
Scott Gwozdz 9 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.12
Technology3.53
Synthesis4.95
Collaboration4.93
Connection3.95
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.23
Grading2.65
Reflection3.88
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.72
Questions4.77
Lydia Anne Dixon 49 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
49 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.60
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.40
Reflection4.40
Respect4.85
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.70
Kimberly L Kosmenko 53 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5
53 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology4.76
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration4.88
Connection4.72
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.54
Inclusivity4.68
Grading4.65
Reflection4.65
Respect4.73
Creativity4.32
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.36
Questions4.79
Natalie Kooi Sim Ooi 51 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
51 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.81
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.66
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.88
Contribution4.76
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity4.91
Grading4.55
Reflection4.71
Respect4.95
Creativity4.58
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.81
Questions4.88
Jonathan Koehn 6 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.50
Connection5.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions4.70
Susan Leach 6 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.50
Connection5.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.70
Questions4.50
Mark Robert Gasta 15 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.70
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.70
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.50
Questions4.90
Logan T Duran 27 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.60
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.20
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.30
Questions4.50
Harmon Zuckerman 6 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.80
Reflection4.50
Respect4.50
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.20
Damien Thompson 18 reported responses 3.96Eval / 5
Overall3.96 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology3.85
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.33
Connection4.68
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.80
Grading2.80
Reflection4.28
Respect4.85
Creativity3.56
Feedback2.93
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.38
Questions4.20
Joshua Henry Radoff 75 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
75 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.68
Technology4.87
Synthesis4.56
Collaboration4.58
Connection4.81
Contribution4.78
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.56
Reflection4.39
Respect4.90
Creativity4.48
Feedback4.31
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.75
Questions4.96
Autumn Bernhardt 18 reported responses 3.97Eval / 5
Overall3.97 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology3.50
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration2.70
Connection4.20
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.00
Reflection4.10
Respect4.90
Creativity3.90
Feedback2.60
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.20
Questions4.20
Christine Ageton 31 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.26
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.62
Contribution4.51
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.49
Grading4.20
Reflection4.64
Respect4.77
Creativity4.57
Feedback4.42
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.33
Questions4.61
Peter Newton 15 reported responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.72
Technology4.99
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.54
Connection5.00
Contribution4.91
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.99
Grading4.96
Reflection4.91
Respect5.00
Creativity4.07
Feedback4.98
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.91
Questions4.99
Colleen Mary Scanlan Lyons 56 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
56 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.28
Technology4.06
Synthesis4.09
Collaboration4.49
Connection4.61
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.72
Inclusivity4.80
Grading3.89
Reflection4.23
Respect4.88
Creativity4.03
Feedback4.12
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.29
Questions4.54
Adam Knoff 37 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.39
Technology4.58
Synthesis4.48
Collaboration4.31
Connection4.89
Contribution4.49
Discussion4.61
Inclusivity4.08
Grading3.68
Reflection4.36
Respect4.62
Creativity4.64
Feedback4.34
Interaction4.52
Challenge4.59
Questions4.29
Owen William Westbrook 37 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.39
Technology4.66
Synthesis4.48
Collaboration4.31
Connection4.89
Contribution4.49
Discussion4.69
Inclusivity4.08
Grading3.87
Reflection4.36
Respect4.89
Creativity4.58
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.52
Challenge4.66
Questions4.31
Robin Lunt 15 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.50
Connection5.00
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.40
Reflection4.90
Respect4.70
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.10
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.60
Robin Zimmerly Meidhof 32 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.69
Technology4.42
Synthesis4.42
Collaboration4.27
Connection4.69
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.27
Grading4.22
Reflection4.52
Respect4.59
Creativity3.87
Feedback3.78
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.67
Questions4.72
Seth Webb 20 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.80
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.70
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.40
Questions4.70
Colette Crouse 32 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.68
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.82
Connection4.90
Contribution4.62
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.52
Reflection4.55
Respect4.68
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.78
Questions4.64
Paul Hendricks 13 reported responses 4.07Eval / 5
Overall4.07 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.20
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.40
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.60
Grading3.50
Reflection4.00
Respect4.60
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.20
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions3.70
Jorge Rafael Figueroa Serrano 16 reported responses 4.01Eval / 5
Overall4.01 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.83
Technology2.86
Synthesis3.72
Collaboration3.88
Connection4.46
Contribution3.91
Discussion3.85
Inclusivity4.49
Grading2.65
Reflection3.80
Respect4.34
Creativity2.98
Feedback2.65
Interaction4.77
Challenge3.75
Questions3.85
Debra Huttner 36 reported responses 3.84Eval / 5
Overall3.84 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.13
Technology3.66
Synthesis3.51
Collaboration4.26
Connection4.40
Contribution4.03
Discussion4.41
Inclusivity3.54
Grading2.95
Reflection3.76
Respect4.40
Creativity3.56
Feedback3.59
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.03
Questions4.22
Peter Lilienthal 25 reported responses 3.05Eval / 5
Overall3.05 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.73
Technology2.95
Synthesis2.81
Collaboration2.99
Connection3.65
Contribution3.38
Discussion3.23
Inclusivity3.62
Grading1.42
Reflection2.68
Respect4.04
Creativity2.03
Feedback1.95
Interaction4.19
Challenge2.81
Questions3.80
Rebecca Clark Siever 41 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
41 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.72
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.75
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.98
Grading4.00
Reflection4.72
Respect4.98
Creativity4.49
Feedback3.95
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.72
Questions4.83
James Donnel 4 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.50
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading3.50
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Kurt Richard James 4 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.50
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading3.50
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Anne Louise Wiper 15 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.60
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.60
Grading3.80
Reflection3.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.30
Questions4.80
Luis Guillermo Benitez 8 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.60
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.10
Grading3.90
Reflection4.10
Respect4.40
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Paul W Lander 5 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.40
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.00
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.20
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Meghan Jane Mccarroll 30 reported responses 4.94Eval / 5
Overall4.94 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.95
Connection5.00
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.95
Reflection4.95
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.85
Questions5.00
Gregor Allen Macgregor 27 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.97
Technology4.79
Synthesis4.88
Collaboration4.69
Connection4.89
Contribution4.87
Discussion4.89
Inclusivity4.88
Grading4.75
Reflection4.97
Respect4.90
Creativity4.98
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.99
Questions5.00
Eric Eugene Huber 17 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology3.40
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.70
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.60
Grading3.80
Reflection3.90
Respect4.70
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.20
Questions4.80
Caroline Downes Ott 17 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.90
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.60
Shanti Pless 14 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.60
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.30
Grading3.60
Reflection4.60
Respect4.60
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.20
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.40
Questions4.50
Emmett Fennell Kaplan 31 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.70
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback3.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Angela J Tutty Fyfe 26 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.72
Technology4.66
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.95
Contribution4.84
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.18
Reflection4.52
Respect4.98
Creativity4.42
Feedback4.52
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.75
Questions4.95
Nicholas Lenssen 10 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.90
Contribution4.60
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.30
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Jessica Kochik 9 reported responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.30
Technology4.70
Synthesis2.80
Collaboration3.30
Connection4.10
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.80
Grading3.90
Reflection3.70
Respect4.70
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.80
Challenge3.90
Questions4.90
Molly Maceachen 9 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.30
Technology4.80
Synthesis2.80
Collaboration3.30
Connection4.10
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.10
Reflection3.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.40
Questions4.70
Quinn Middleton 9 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.80
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.00
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.90
Questions4.40
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.