Course record ENVD
ENVD 1130
Studio 2: Fundamentals of Design 3
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable14 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2024
Flunk Score34/100
Below average
Robin Lynn Rooney 6 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.80
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.80
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.30
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Sara Tabatabaie 22 reported responses 4.02Eval / 5
Overall4.02 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.94
Technology4.34
Synthesis3.97
Collaboration3.72
Connection4.05
Contribution4.08
Discussion4.33
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.68
Reflection4.19
Respect4.68
Creativity4.13
Feedback4.06
Interaction4.26
Challenge4.50
Questions4.28
Christy Lee Rogers 11 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.90
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
F Siobhan M Brooks 22 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.81
Synthesis4.77
Collaboration4.81
Connection4.53
Contribution4.74
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.44
Grading4.74
Reflection4.82
Respect4.84
Creativity4.88
Feedback4.84
Interaction4.47
Challenge4.84
Questions4.83
Emily Rose Greenwood 11 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.20
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.10
Reflection4.50
Respect4.70
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.50
Questions4.60
Magdalena A Aravena Gutierrez 20 reported responses 3.69Eval / 5
Overall3.69 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.32
Technology2.80
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration2.16
Connection3.90
Contribution3.63
Discussion3.22
Inclusivity3.78
Grading3.58
Reflection3.65
Respect4.28
Creativity4.54
Feedback2.68
Interaction4.35
Challenge3.68
Questions3.20
Jesse Peter Van Horne 18 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.26
Technology3.43
Synthesis4.76
Collaboration4.23
Connection4.45
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.10
Grading3.13
Reflection4.48
Respect4.56
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.13
Interaction4.64
Challenge4.48
Questions4.10
Amy Katherine Saunders 12 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.50
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.80
Reflection4.60
Respect4.60
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.60
Questions4.40
Zannah Matson 21 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.20
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.10
Reflection4.10
Respect4.40
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.30
Questions4.30
Gregory John Crichlow 21 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.30
Grading3.90
Reflection4.50
Respect4.40
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.70
Questions4.10
Juan Grisales 5 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.60
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.20
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.40
Questions4.20
Susan Amanda Massey 19 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.40
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.30
Grading3.80
Reflection4.30
Respect4.30
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.20
Questions4.00
Scott Vangenderen 15 reported responses 4.18Eval / 5
Overall4.18 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.30
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.70
Reflection4.10
Respect4.20
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.30
Questions4.10
Nettie Skievaski 4 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.80
Grading5.00
Reflection3.80
Respect4.80
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.