Course record ENVD

ENVD 1120

Studio 2: Fundamentals of Environmental Design 2

University of Colorado Boulder

Grade distribution unavailable29 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score40/100
Mixed record

Professors 29 of 29

Elizabeth Jane Smith 10 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.80
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.10
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.50
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Marianne Bellino 12 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.20
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.30
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Jade Venus Polizzi 20 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.67
Technology4.68
Synthesis4.88
Collaboration4.56
Connection4.38
Contribution4.84
Discussion4.66
Inclusivity4.56
Grading4.83
Reflection4.78
Respect4.77
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.83
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.68
Questions4.76
Open full professor record
Kimberly Alaine Drennan 16 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.86
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.76
Contribution4.93
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.88
Grading4.68
Reflection4.88
Respect5.00
Creativity4.92
Feedback4.93
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.98
Questions4.72
Open full professor record
Alicja Vernoica Hudson 10 reported responses 3.81Eval / 5
Overall3.81 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology3.60
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.10
Contribution3.80
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity3.20
Grading3.20
Reflection4.00
Respect3.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.10
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.00
Questions3.90
Open full professor record
John Brandon Anderson 12 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.83
Technology3.90
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration4.01
Connection4.12
Contribution4.98
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.49
Grading3.07
Reflection4.51
Respect4.85
Creativity4.76
Feedback4.36
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.75
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Alexandra Mariel Coit Beach 12 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.10
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.10
Reflection4.50
Respect4.40
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.60
Questions4.50
Open full professor record
Neal Evers 33 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5

33 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.12
Technology4.41
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration4.45
Connection3.81
Contribution4.07
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity4.06
Grading4.37
Reflection4.23
Respect4.51
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.31
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.47
Questions4.40
Open full professor record
Gage Christopher Duran 15 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.70
Contribution4.60
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.40
Reflection4.60
Respect4.60
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Harvey Marc Hine 3 reported responses 4.00Eval / 5
Overall4.00 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology3.30
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.30
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.70
Grading2.70
Reflection4.30
Respect3.30
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.00
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Sara Tabatabaie 3 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.30
Contribution4.30
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity4.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.30
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Raquel D Mayorga 5 reported responses 3.20Eval / 5
Overall3.20 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.30
Technology3.00
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration3.80
Connection3.40
Contribution3.00
Discussion3.40
Inclusivity2.30
Grading2.20
Reflection3.60
Respect3.80
Creativity4.20
Feedback2.60
Interaction4.20
Challenge3.00
Questions3.40
Open full professor record
Susan Atkinson Glenn 37 reported responses 3.55Eval / 5
Overall3.55 / 5

37 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology2.56
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration3.72
Connection3.49
Contribution3.31
Discussion3.25
Inclusivity3.11
Grading2.52
Reflection3.60
Respect3.24
Creativity4.09
Feedback3.21
Interaction3.84
Challenge3.49
Questions3.25
Open full professor record
Jake Sharlin Morris 3 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.30
Grading3.70
Reflection4.30
Respect4.30
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Guadalupe Cantu 3 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.30
Reflection4.70
Respect4.70
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Janna Lynn Ferguson 13 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.40
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.30
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Rachel Ann Lavine 23 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.52
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.49
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.65
Reflection4.65
Respect5.00
Creativity4.69
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.75
Open full professor record
Andrew Allmon 11 reported responses 4.08Eval / 5
Overall4.08 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology3.90
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.10
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.80
Grading3.20
Reflection4.50
Respect4.20
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.30
Questions4.40
Open full professor record
Marianne Holbert 4 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.50
Reflection5.00
Respect4.50
Creativity4.80
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Martin Paddack 15 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.60
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.40
Grading3.90
Reflection4.30
Respect4.90
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.50
Questions4.00
Open full professor record
Susan Amanda Massey 36 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5

36 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.32
Technology4.28
Synthesis4.58
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.49
Contribution4.32
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity3.80
Grading3.75
Reflection4.45
Respect4.55
Creativity4.34
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.38
Questions4.43
Open full professor record
Elizabeth Isbell Smith 10 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.80
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.10
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.50
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Jeremy G. Ehly 17 reported responses 4.05Eval / 5
Overall4.05 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.10
Contribution4.20
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity3.60
Grading3.80
Reflection4.20
Respect4.00
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.30
Questions4.10
Open full professor record
Wendy Heather Smith 12 reported responses 3.85Eval / 5
Overall3.85 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.60
Connection3.70
Contribution4.30
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity3.70
Grading3.30
Reflection3.80
Respect4.20
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.30
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.10
Questions4.00
Open full professor record
Juan Grisales 16 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.30
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.10
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Gregg Harvey 7 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.90
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.40
Reflection4.40
Respect4.40
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Elena Sabinson 13 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.20
Reflection4.20
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.20
Questions4.50
Open full professor record
Sophie Chien 14 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.80
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.40
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Lei Shi 19 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.50
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.20
Grading3.70
Reflection4.50
Respect4.50
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.60
Questions4.30
Open full professor record
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.