Course record ENVD
ENVD 1040
Studio 1: Introduction to Sustainable Planning and Urban Design
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable27 professors
Evaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score38/100
Below average
Scott Vangenderen 124 reported responses 4.18Eval / 5
Overall4.18 / 5
124 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology3.98
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.29
Connection4.65
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity4.21
Grading3.65
Reflection4.34
Respect4.15
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.56
Challenge4.24
Questions4.56
Sara Tabatabaie 44 reported responses 3.68Eval / 5
Overall3.68 / 5
44 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.31
Synthesis4.31
Collaboration4.18
Connection4.59
Contribution4.00
Discussion3.92
Inclusivity4.19
Grading3.70
Reflection3.91
Respect3.82
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.43
Interaction4.02
Challenge3.82
Questions4.02
Jose Escobar 10 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.84
Technology4.91
Synthesis4.91
Collaboration4.82
Connection4.93
Contribution4.91
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.82
Reflection4.86
Respect4.93
Creativity4.93
Feedback4.91
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.91
Questions4.93
Stacey Lynn Schulte 54 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5
54 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.41
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.49
Connection4.60
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.21
Inclusivity4.30
Grading3.61
Reflection4.60
Respect4.60
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.01
Christy Lee Rogers 6 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.70
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Magdalena A Aravena Gutierrez 10 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology4.38
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration3.69
Connection4.38
Contribution4.31
Discussion4.38
Inclusivity4.08
Grading3.92
Reflection4.00
Respect4.46
Creativity4.31
Feedback3.77
Interaction4.23
Challenge4.23
Questions3.92
Reese Shaw 5 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.30
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration2.00
Connection4.20
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.20
Grading4.40
Reflection4.40
Respect5.00
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.40
Questions4.20
John Keenan Hersey 41 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
41 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.58
Connection4.89
Contribution4.68
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.20
Reflection4.70
Respect4.51
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.59
Questions4.60
Susan Atkinson Glenn 17 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.60
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.10
Reflection4.60
Respect4.60
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
Krista Flynt 6 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.80
Reflection4.00
Respect4.50
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.80
Questions4.70
David Wayne Shirk 16 reported responses 3.92Eval / 5
Overall3.92 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.30
Technology3.76
Synthesis3.66
Collaboration3.76
Connection4.14
Contribution3.54
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity3.81
Grading3.26
Reflection3.82
Respect3.96
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.35
Interaction4.22
Challenge3.58
Questions3.85
Valeria Henao Cano 76 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
76 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.74
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.41
Connection4.79
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.56
Inclusivity4.68
Grading4.43
Reflection4.78
Respect4.83
Creativity4.83
Feedback4.89
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.75
Questions4.82
John Brandon Anderson 13 reported responses 3.27Eval / 5
Overall3.27 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology3.20
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration2.50
Connection3.70
Contribution3.20
Discussion3.20
Inclusivity3.10
Grading2.80
Reflection3.10
Respect3.80
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.00
Interaction3.60
Challenge3.60
Questions2.80
Nettie Skievaski 2 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Caitlin Charlet 34 reported responses 4.04Eval / 5
Overall4.04 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.12
Technology4.33
Synthesis4.78
Collaboration4.45
Connection4.58
Contribution4.11
Discussion4.08
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.63
Reflection4.45
Respect4.42
Creativity4.74
Feedback4.33
Interaction4.54
Challenge4.46
Questions4.51
Azza Kamal 50 reported responses 3.59Eval / 5
Overall3.59 / 5
50 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.66
Technology3.25
Synthesis3.92
Collaboration3.86
Connection3.77
Contribution3.53
Discussion3.21
Inclusivity3.83
Grading2.49
Reflection3.63
Respect3.68
Creativity3.76
Feedback3.23
Interaction3.81
Challenge3.32
Questions3.15
Shawhin Roudbari 18 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.20
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Chad Kipfer 10 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.40
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.20
Reflection4.70
Respect4.70
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Kevin J. Krizek 4 reported responses 2.18Eval / 5
Overall2.18 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology2.20
Synthesis3.20
Collaboration2.80
Connection3.20
Contribution2.80
Discussion1.80
Inclusivity3.00
Grading2.00
Reflection3.00
Respect2.00
Creativity2.30
Feedback1.00
Interaction3.20
Challenge1.50
Questions2.00
Emily Rose Greenwood 17 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.80
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.50
Reflection4.40
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Marianne Holbert 13 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.70
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.20
Reflection4.40
Respect4.40
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.60
Gregory John Crichlow 7 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.60
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.70
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.50
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.90
Challenge5.00
Questions4.40
Shital Dighe Barman 28 reported responses 4.05Eval / 5
Overall4.05 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology3.88
Synthesis4.58
Collaboration4.41
Connection4.64
Contribution4.56
Discussion4.32
Inclusivity4.69
Grading3.42
Reflection4.34
Respect4.65
Creativity4.63
Feedback4.12
Interaction4.59
Challenge4.50
Questions4.05
Virginia Ann Skartvedt 11 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.80
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.60
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Elizabeth Isbell Smith 16 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.80
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.60
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.40
Questions4.70
Casey M Lindberg 9 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.70
Reflection4.90
Respect4.80
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Dean Bacalzo 6 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.50
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.70
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect4.70
Creativity4.70
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.