Course record ENVD
ENVD 1020
Studio 1: Introduction to Architecture
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable34 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score40/100
Mixed record
Elizabeth Jane Smith 9 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology3.10
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.20
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.20
Reflection4.30
Respect4.40
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.60
Questions4.40
Betsy Holt Johnson 6 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.30
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Neal Evers 21 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.70
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.80
Reflection4.90
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.90
Questions4.80
Sara Tabatabaie 10 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.40
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.70
Grading3.90
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.40
Questions4.80
Rachel Ann Lavine 115 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
115 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.13
Technology4.14
Synthesis4.74
Collaboration4.11
Connection4.55
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.38
Inclusivity3.76
Grading4.04
Reflection4.65
Respect4.60
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.71
Questions4.83
Jeremy G. Ehly 42 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5
42 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology4.13
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.17
Connection4.05
Contribution4.39
Discussion4.41
Inclusivity3.90
Grading3.83
Reflection4.52
Respect4.50
Creativity4.44
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.53
Challenge4.44
Questions4.39
Jesse Peter Van Horne 15 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.68
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.91
Collaboration4.64
Connection4.55
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.58
Grading4.05
Reflection4.73
Respect4.73
Creativity4.91
Feedback4.71
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.68
Questions4.59
Robin Lynn Rooney 8 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.60
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.50
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
John Brandon Anderson 32 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.50
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.00
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Azhar Ahmed Khan 11 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.80
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.40
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.30
Grading3.60
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Christy Lee Rogers 10 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.55
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.70
Reflection4.65
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.70
Questions4.85
Kimberly Alaine Drennan 11 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.20
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity3.75
Grading3.60
Reflection4.25
Respect4.80
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.55
Questions4.35
Shawhin Roudbari 44 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5
44 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology3.40
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.06
Connection3.82
Contribution4.12
Discussion3.86
Inclusivity3.95
Grading3.26
Reflection4.27
Respect4.34
Creativity4.72
Feedback3.89
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.45
Questions3.96
Casey M Lindberg 17 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology4.19
Synthesis4.72
Collaboration4.12
Connection3.97
Contribution4.61
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.03
Grading4.09
Reflection4.24
Respect4.69
Creativity4.91
Feedback4.42
Interaction4.62
Challenge4.50
Questions4.64
Lei Shi 18 reported responses 3.90Eval / 5
Overall3.90 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.51
Technology2.81
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.80
Connection3.41
Contribution3.71
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity3.01
Grading1.81
Reflection3.51
Respect3.61
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.11
Interaction3.81
Challenge4.01
Questions3.61
Dina Rozin 12 reported responses 2.46Eval / 5
Overall2.46 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.35
Technology1.77
Synthesis2.68
Collaboration3.08
Connection2.38
Contribution2.57
Discussion2.49
Inclusivity2.18
Grading1.62
Reflection2.62
Respect2.35
Creativity3.07
Feedback2.46
Interaction3.31
Challenge2.22
Questions2.73
Marianne Holbert 20 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology4.68
Synthesis4.77
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.39
Contribution4.79
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.38
Grading4.68
Reflection4.68
Respect4.79
Creativity4.88
Feedback4.74
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.77
Questions4.79
Benjamin Bigelow Burghart 4 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.80
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.00
Reflection4.20
Respect4.80
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Dean Bacalzo 21 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.92
Collaboration4.46
Connection4.65
Contribution4.49
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.37
Grading4.32
Reflection4.85
Respect4.92
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.72
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.92
Questions4.77
David John Kemp 2 reported responses 3.10Eval / 5
Overall3.10 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology1.50
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.50
Contribution5.00
Discussion2.50
Inclusivity4.00
Grading1.00
Reflection2.50
Respect2.00
Creativity3.50
Feedback2.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions3.00
Scott Vangenderen 10 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.70
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.10
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions4.70
Chad Kipfer 2 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology3.50
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.00
Reflection5.00
Respect4.50
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Guadalupe Cantu 5 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology3.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.60
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.80
Grading3.20
Reflection4.80
Respect4.60
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.40
Questions4.00
Mark Rukamathu 16 reported responses 4.03Eval / 5
Overall4.03 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.70
Connection3.50
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.50
Reflection4.40
Respect4.40
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.10
Questions4.20
Jose Escobar 16 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.10
Connection3.90
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.00
Reflection4.70
Respect4.30
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Elena Sabinson 15 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration3.90
Connection3.90
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.50
Reflection4.60
Respect4.30
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Susan Amanda Massey 36 reported responses 4.06Eval / 5
Overall4.06 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.07
Technology3.83
Synthesis4.54
Collaboration4.04
Connection3.59
Contribution4.38
Discussion4.21
Inclusivity3.75
Grading3.95
Reflection4.24
Respect4.66
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.24
Interaction4.61
Challenge4.45
Questions4.44
Caitlin Charlet 19 reported responses 3.57Eval / 5
Overall3.57 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration3.80
Connection3.60
Contribution3.60
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity3.50
Grading2.70
Reflection3.80
Respect3.40
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.30
Interaction3.90
Challenge4.00
Questions3.50
Melissa H Felderman 8 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology3.10
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.10
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.20
Reflection4.40
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.10
Martin Paddack 17 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.30
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Nesrine Mansour 15 reported responses 3.96Eval / 5
Overall3.96 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.06
Technology3.35
Synthesis4.39
Collaboration3.99
Connection4.19
Contribution4.08
Discussion4.08
Inclusivity4.24
Grading3.45
Reflection4.22
Respect4.18
Creativity4.31
Feedback3.78
Interaction4.22
Challenge4.35
Questions3.91
Shital Dighe Barman 16 reported responses 4.08Eval / 5
Overall4.08 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology3.60
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.40
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity4.10
Grading3.10
Reflection4.20
Respect4.20
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.40
Questions3.90
Elizabeth Isbell Smith 12 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.88
Technology4.56
Synthesis4.86
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.82
Contribution4.54
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.42
Grading4.82
Reflection4.84
Respect4.86
Creativity4.86
Feedback4.56
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.91
Questions4.86
Nettie Skievaski 26 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.48
Technology4.15
Synthesis4.58
Collaboration3.77
Connection4.47
Contribution4.17
Discussion4.19
Inclusivity4.09
Grading4.43
Reflection4.57
Respect4.19
Creativity4.56
Feedback4.44
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.54
Questions4.59
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.