Course record ENVD

ENVD 1010

Studio 1: Introduction to Environmental Products of Design

University of Colorado Boulder

Grade distribution unavailable29 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score43/100
Mixed record

Professors 29 of 29

Melissa H Felderman 27 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5

27 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.37
Connection4.50
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.11
Grading4.20
Reflection4.21
Respect4.54
Creativity4.64
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.19
Questions4.91
Open full professor record
Kimberly Alaine Drennan 5 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.20
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.80
Grading3.80
Reflection4.40
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Shawhin Roudbari 19 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.80
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.30
Reflection4.75
Respect4.95
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.65
Open full professor record
Justin T Bellucci 3 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.70
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.00
Reflection5.00
Respect4.30
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Robin Lynn Rooney 9 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.60
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.60
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.60
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Azhar Ahmed Khan 24 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

24 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.52
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.25
Connection4.32
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.62
Inclusivity3.83
Grading4.06
Reflection4.33
Respect4.92
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.73
Questions4.85
Open full professor record
Jeremy G. Ehly 118 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5

118 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.26
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.68
Collaboration4.33
Connection4.49
Contribution4.64
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.55
Reflection4.48
Respect4.80
Creativity4.88
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.72
Questions4.59
Open full professor record
Neal Evers 5 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.40
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Nicolas Burger 5 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.60
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.40
Reflection4.00
Respect4.20
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.40
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Susan Atkinson Glenn 34 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

34 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.25
Connection4.25
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.55
Grading3.85
Reflection4.40
Respect4.45
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.65
Questions4.65
Open full professor record
David Hemsi 72 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5

72 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.32
Technology4.28
Synthesis4.89
Collaboration4.76
Connection4.67
Contribution4.64
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.63
Grading3.70
Reflection4.45
Respect4.53
Creativity4.83
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.72
Questions4.46
Open full professor record
Magdalena A Aravena Gutierrez 8 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.40
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.40
Grading3.90
Reflection4.00
Respect4.60
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.10
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Lei Shi 24 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

24 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology3.91
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.10
Contribution4.01
Discussion4.01
Inclusivity3.80
Grading2.81
Reflection4.50
Respect4.60
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.11
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.40
Questions4.01
Open full professor record
Jared Arp 15 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.70
Reflection4.20
Respect4.50
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.40
Questions4.30
Open full professor record
Dean Bacalzo 41 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

41 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.77
Collaboration4.24
Connection4.75
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.33
Grading4.40
Reflection4.72
Respect4.72
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.86
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.77
Questions4.85
Open full professor record
Amy Katherine Saunders 51 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5

51 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.79
Technology4.31
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration4.14
Connection4.18
Contribution4.11
Discussion4.11
Inclusivity3.91
Grading4.06
Reflection3.99
Respect4.19
Creativity4.59
Feedback3.86
Interaction4.61
Challenge4.22
Questions4.13
Open full professor record
Thomas Vincent Hoffmann 16 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.01
Technology3.46
Synthesis4.69
Collaboration4.32
Connection4.80
Contribution4.11
Discussion4.11
Inclusivity4.04
Grading3.22
Reflection4.49
Respect4.08
Creativity4.78
Feedback4.16
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.24
Questions3.95
Open full professor record
Gregory John Crichlow 18 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.20
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.90
Grading3.70
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.40
Open full professor record
Jesse Peter Van Horne 6 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.70
Contribution3.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.50
Creativity4.70
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge5.00
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Caitlin Charlet 26 reported responses 3.93Eval / 5
Overall3.93 / 5

26 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.24
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.07
Connection4.75
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.24
Inclusivity4.39
Grading3.38
Reflection4.38
Respect4.47
Creativity4.68
Feedback3.88
Interaction4.34
Challenge4.73
Questions4.62
Open full professor record
Joe Laform 17 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.50
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.90
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Nettie Skievaski 45 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5

45 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.74
Technology4.37
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.84
Connection4.62
Contribution4.39
Discussion4.74
Inclusivity3.89
Grading3.81
Reflection4.29
Respect4.46
Creativity4.81
Feedback4.49
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.49
Questions4.61
Open full professor record
Elena Sabinson 8 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.10
Connection3.60
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.90
Grading3.40
Reflection4.50
Respect4.70
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Jade Venus Polizzi 4 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.80
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.00
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Martin Paddack 34 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5

34 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.44
Technology4.33
Synthesis4.71
Collaboration4.18
Connection4.58
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.53
Inclusivity4.13
Grading4.07
Reflection4.78
Respect4.75
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.71
Challenge4.70
Questions4.66
Open full professor record
Sophie Chien 17 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.80
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.40
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge5.00
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Andrew Richard Wollenberg 11 reported responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.20
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.80
Reflection4.20
Respect4.40
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.10
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Jennifer Kovarik 16 reported responses 3.00Eval / 5
Overall3.00 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.70
Technology2.90
Synthesis3.20
Collaboration3.10
Connection3.00
Contribution3.40
Discussion3.40
Inclusivity2.60
Grading2.80
Reflection3.30
Respect3.40
Creativity3.40
Feedback2.10
Interaction3.90
Challenge2.80
Questions2.80
Open full professor record
Wendy Heather Smith 13 reported responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology3.80
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.00
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.40
Reflection4.60
Respect4.10
Creativity4.70
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions4.20
Open full professor record
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.