Course record ENVD

ENVD 1002

Technology 1: Applications for Environmental Design

University of Colorado Boulder

452 grades27 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score26/100
Below average

Professors 27 of 27

Jade Venus Polizzi 452 grades · 1 term 3.14GPA
48.2% A
35.4% B
8.2% C
1.8% D
6.4% F

452 letter grades

2.0% withdrew · 9 of 461 enrolled.

Mary-Anna Catherine Spears 9 reported responses 4.00Eval / 5
Overall4.00 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.20
Reflection4.10
Respect4.90
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.10
Questions4.40
Jack Lucas Green 25 reported responses 3.60Eval / 5
Overall3.60 / 5

25 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.25
Technology2.95
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration3.35
Connection3.25
Contribution3.70
Discussion3.75
Inclusivity2.85
Grading2.90
Reflection3.85
Respect4.15
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.45
Interaction4.25
Challenge3.70
Questions3.70
Anthony Jordan Cruz 25 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5

25 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology3.85
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.35
Connection3.65
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.20
Grading3.75
Reflection4.15
Respect4.70
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.15
Questions4.30
Leah Francisca Lawson 20 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.25
Connection3.75
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.55
Grading4.35
Reflection4.10
Respect4.50
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.60
Questions4.55
Ainsley June Watkins 10 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.35
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.30
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.20
Questions4.60
David Echevarria Lopez 8 reported responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology4.50
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration3.60
Connection3.50
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity2.90
Grading4.10
Reflection4.00
Respect4.50
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.10
Questions4.60
Sage Davis 9 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.90
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.90
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.70
Challenge5.00
Questions4.90
Gio Gordillo 12 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.40
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.80
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Valeria Henao Cano 11 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.90
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.10
Reflection4.50
Respect4.70
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.40
Benji Montoya 12 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology3.60
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.80
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.60
Grading3.90
Reflection4.30
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.30
Questions4.80
Kaira Theisen 12 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.20
Connection3.50
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.20
Reflection3.80
Respect4.60
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.20
Questions4.60
Tyler Byrne 13 reported responses 4.04Eval / 5
Overall4.04 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.40
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.20
Connection3.30
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity2.80
Grading3.80
Reflection3.90
Respect4.20
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.00
Questions4.40
Kaija Galins 8 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.00
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.50
Reflection4.80
Respect4.20
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Mia Winstead 21 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.03
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.62
Connection4.26
Contribution4.22
Discussion4.52
Inclusivity3.84
Grading4.60
Reflection4.47
Respect4.82
Creativity4.26
Feedback4.62
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.78
Questions4.88
Amelie Nicole Couret 13 reported responses 3.92Eval / 5
Overall3.92 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology3.50
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.20
Connection3.40
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity3.60
Grading3.10
Reflection3.70
Respect4.70
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.80
Challenge3.90
Questions4.20
Evie Warner 24 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5

24 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.12
Technology4.58
Synthesis4.58
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.05
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity4.12
Grading4.58
Reflection4.63
Respect4.78
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.62
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.42
Questions4.82
Brooke Shifrin 14 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.70
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.60
Connection3.80
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.60
Reflection4.40
Respect4.60
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.50
Questions4.70
Caitlin Charlet 10 reported responses 3.88Eval / 5
Overall3.88 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.93
Technology4.37
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration3.64
Connection3.88
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.28
Inclusivity3.62
Grading3.81
Reflection4.01
Respect4.55
Creativity4.58
Feedback4.49
Interaction4.12
Challenge4.55
Questions4.49
Nettie Skievaski 3 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.70
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.70
Grading3.70
Reflection4.70
Respect4.70
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.30
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Dean Bacalzo 148 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5

148 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.13
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration4.15
Connection4.51
Contribution4.13
Discussion4.48
Inclusivity4.18
Grading4.15
Reflection4.51
Respect4.57
Creativity4.53
Feedback3.92
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.55
Questions4.53
Kinsey Anger 5 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.60
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Sophie Burke 7 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.40
Connection3.90
Contribution3.40
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.20
Grading4.90
Reflection3.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.30
Questions4.70
Raquel Tapia 6 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.20
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.60
Reflection4.30
Respect5.00
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.40
Questions4.60
Maddie Veasey 8 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.20
Connection3.90
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.30
Grading5.00
Reflection4.10
Respect4.80
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.40
Questions4.80
Andrew Mcdonald 6 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.70
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.70
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.70
Natalie Prager 3 reported responses 3.90Eval / 5
Overall3.90 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.30
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.30
Connection3.70
Contribution3.30
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.30
Grading3.00
Reflection3.70
Respect4.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.70
Questions4.30
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.