Course record ENGL
ENGL 3060
Modern and Contemporary Literature for Nonmajors
University of Colorado Boulder
451 grades17 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2024
Flunk Score67/100
Strong
Jenna Michaele Gersie 81 grades · 1 term 3.90GPA
81 letter grades
Compare with the course
Gersie vs. the course average
A
+21.1
B
−15.8
C
−2.0
D
−2.4
F
−0.9
Difference in percentage points.
1.2% withdrew · 1 of 82 enrolled.
Overall4.83 / 5
43 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.83
Technology4.86
Synthesis4.87
Collaboration4.46
Connection4.90
Contribution4.89
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.86
Reflection4.90
Respect4.99
Creativity4.84
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.79
Questions4.99
Matthew Scott Tettleton 40 grades · 1 term 3.79GPA
40 letter grades
Compare with the course
Tettleton vs. the course average
A
+9.8
B
−7.0
C
+0.5
D
−2.4
F
−0.9
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 40 enrolled.
Overall4.23 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.24
Technology4.70
Synthesis2.80
Collaboration3.43
Connection3.45
Contribution4.27
Discussion3.32
Inclusivity4.92
Grading4.12
Reflection4.17
Respect4.96
Creativity4.21
Feedback3.10
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.02
Questions4.89
Raza Ali Hasan 101 grades · 1 term 3.59GPA
101 letter grades
Compare with the course
Hasan vs. the course average
A
−13.3
B
+18.6
C
−2.0
D
−2.4
F
−0.9
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 101 enrolled.
Overall4.60 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.50
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.60
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Devon Lamonte Keyes 103 grades · 1 term 3.58GPA
103 letter grades
Compare with the course
Keyes vs. the course average
A
+6.9
B
−11.3
C
+0.9
D
+1.4
F
+2.0
Difference in percentage points.
5.5% withdrew · 6 of 109 enrolled.
Overall4.77 / 5
35 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.91
Synthesis4.87
Collaboration4.73
Connection4.62
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.86
Grading4.59
Reflection4.90
Respect4.88
Creativity4.98
Feedback4.56
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.78
Questions4.85
Maria A. Windell 25 grades · 1 term 3.22GPA
25 letter grades
Compare with the course
Windell vs. the course average
A
−32.7
B
+30.0
C
+6.0
D
−2.4
F
−0.9
Difference in percentage points.
3.8% withdrew · 1 of 26 enrolled.
Overall4.39 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.80
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.60
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.30
Questions4.70
Stephen Jeffrey Mruzik 12 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.78GPA
12 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 12 enrolled.
Overall4.80 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading5.00
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Catherine Labio 23 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.77GPA
23 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 23 enrolled.
Judith L. Strathearn 18 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.62GPA
18 letter grades · Limited sample
10.0% withdrew · 2 of 20 enrolled.
Garrett Tallman Biggs 12 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.31GPA
12 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 12 enrolled.
Overall4.48 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.20
Connection3.80
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.20
Reflection4.70
Respect4.70
Creativity4.90
Feedback3.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions4.60
Maxwell C Cassity 12 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.19GPA
12 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 12 enrolled.
Renata L Ryan Burchfield 24 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 2.94GPA
24 letter grades · Limited sample
4.0% withdrew · 1 of 25 enrolled.
Judith Lynn Costello 7 reported responses 4.94Eval / 5
Overall4.94 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.60
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.60
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect4.90
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge5.00
Questions4.90
Jennifer C Cookson 4 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.50
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.80
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.80
Questions3.00
Michael Schrimper 4 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.80
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.00
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.00
Questions4.50
Melodie A Roschman 5 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.40
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.40
Questions4.40
Laura Ann Winkiel 8 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology3.55
Synthesis3.55
Collaboration3.23
Connection3.55
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.09
Reflection4.37
Respect4.77
Creativity4.68
Feedback4.32
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.37
Questions3.75
Amanda L Hurtado 12 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.61
Technology4.96
Synthesis4.97
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.96
Contribution4.96
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.99
Grading4.58
Reflection4.96
Respect4.99
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.84
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.55
Questions4.83
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.