Course record ENGL

ENGL 3026

Syntax, Citation, Analysis: Writing About Literature

University of Colorado Boulder

Grade distribution unavailable30 professors
Evaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score34/100
Below average

Professors 30 of 30

James Roland Carson 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Melanie Catherine Lo 7 reported responses 4.18Eval / 5
Overall4.18 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.00
Connection3.10
Contribution3.70
Discussion3.40
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.60
Reflection3.90
Respect4.30
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.60
Interaction3.60
Challenge4.70
Questions4.40
Open full professor record
Thora Brylowe 37 reported responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5

37 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.17
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.22
Connection4.20
Contribution4.64
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.96
Grading4.41
Reflection4.68
Respect4.90
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.59
Questions4.53
Open full professor record
Grace Rexroth 13 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.69
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.59
Connection4.49
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.59
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.30
Reflection4.80
Respect4.60
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Conny Lisa Cassity 1 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology2.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration3.00
Connection4.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Nicole M Wright 38 reported responses 3.71Eval / 5
Overall3.71 / 5

38 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.56
Technology2.72
Synthesis3.06
Collaboration4.31
Connection2.88
Contribution3.86
Discussion3.14
Inclusivity3.58
Grading1.83
Reflection3.25
Respect2.89
Creativity3.05
Feedback1.42
Interaction4.04
Challenge2.88
Questions2.92
Open full professor record
Gabriel E Coffman 14 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.87
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.37
Connection4.22
Contribution4.96
Discussion4.99
Inclusivity4.69
Grading3.89
Reflection4.53
Respect4.90
Creativity4.74
Feedback4.96
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.91
Questions4.58
Open full professor record
Sang Hee Lee 55 reported responses 3.80Eval / 5
Overall3.80 / 5

55 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology3.30
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.34
Connection3.04
Contribution4.26
Discussion3.98
Inclusivity3.51
Grading3.56
Reflection3.66
Respect4.45
Creativity4.08
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.23
Challenge4.11
Questions4.23
Open full professor record
Teresa L Nugent 12 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.84
Technology4.69
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration3.57
Connection4.41
Contribution4.84
Discussion4.69
Inclusivity4.97
Grading3.75
Reflection4.84
Respect4.84
Creativity4.69
Feedback4.06
Interaction4.67
Challenge5.00
Questions4.28
Open full professor record
Emily Marie Harrington 9 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.30
Connection3.90
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.30
Grading3.40
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.40
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Marie Jaquelin Pelzer 1 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.00
Open full professor record
Jessica Lynn Lawson 17 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.44
Technology3.67
Synthesis4.48
Collaboration3.37
Connection3.85
Contribution4.42
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity4.42
Grading4.33
Reflection4.27
Respect4.81
Creativity4.12
Feedback3.32
Interaction4.32
Challenge4.12
Questions3.15
Open full professor record
Riley Bartlett 20 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.18
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration3.89
Connection4.65
Contribution4.81
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.10
Reflection4.80
Respect4.38
Creativity4.58
Feedback4.22
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.52
Questions4.20
Open full professor record
Dan Leamen 9 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology3.65
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration3.65
Connection4.55
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.50
Grading3.80
Reflection4.30
Respect4.55
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.20
Questions4.00
Open full professor record
Mitch Christensen 3 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect4.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.75
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Lori Lucas Schuyler 13 reported responses 3.95Eval / 5
Overall3.95 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology2.20
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.50
Connection3.80
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.60
Grading3.10
Reflection4.20
Respect4.00
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.20
Questions4.20
Open full professor record
Justin Michael Saxby 56 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5

56 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.94
Technology3.73
Synthesis4.94
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.92
Contribution4.93
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.99
Grading4.11
Reflection4.93
Respect4.99
Creativity4.37
Feedback3.77
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.95
Questions4.81
Open full professor record
Cheryl A Higashida 5 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration3.60
Connection3.60
Contribution4.60
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.60
Reflection4.40
Respect5.00
Creativity4.40
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.40
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Mairead Corrine Case 5 reported responses 3.60Eval / 5
Overall3.60 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology3.50
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.35
Connection3.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion3.85
Inclusivity3.60
Grading3.35
Reflection3.50
Respect3.85
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.65
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.15
Questions4.00
Open full professor record
Ruth Ellen Kocher 10 reported responses 3.74Eval / 5
Overall3.74 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.88
Technology3.17
Synthesis4.84
Collaboration2.39
Connection3.36
Contribution3.90
Discussion2.14
Inclusivity4.44
Grading3.18
Reflection4.21
Respect4.40
Creativity4.25
Feedback2.84
Interaction3.19
Challenge4.51
Questions2.63
Open full professor record
Marissa Elizabeth Grunes 20 reported responses 4.92Eval / 5
Overall4.92 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.94
Technology4.94
Synthesis4.94
Collaboration4.94
Connection4.65
Contribution4.94
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.59
Grading4.89
Reflection4.94
Respect4.96
Creativity4.96
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.96
Challenge5.00
Questions4.98
Open full professor record
Jillian Heydt-Stevenson 3 reported responses 3.84Eval / 5
Overall3.84 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology2.70
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.30
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.70
Grading3.30
Reflection3.70
Respect3.70
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.70
Interaction3.70
Challenge4.00
Questions3.70
Open full professor record
Katherine C. Little 11 reported responses 3.42Eval / 5
Overall3.42 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology3.10
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.10
Connection2.75
Contribution3.60
Discussion3.75
Inclusivity3.25
Grading3.55
Reflection3.65
Respect3.90
Creativity3.25
Feedback2.65
Interaction4.25
Challenge2.75
Questions3.80
Open full professor record
Jenny Cookson 7 reported responses 3.52Eval / 5
Overall3.52 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology2.70
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.10
Connection3.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.00
Grading2.70
Reflection3.90
Respect4.00
Creativity4.20
Feedback2.30
Interaction3.90
Challenge4.00
Questions3.80
Open full professor record
Lori Lucas 8 reported responses 3.34Eval / 5
Overall3.34 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology1.90
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration3.40
Connection3.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity3.50
Grading2.20
Reflection3.10
Respect2.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.20
Challenge3.90
Questions3.40
Open full professor record
Lilly Rothman 6 reported responses 3.76Eval / 5
Overall3.76 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology3.50
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration4.30
Connection2.80
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.50
Reflection3.20
Respect4.30
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.30
Questions4.30
Open full professor record
Hannah C Blanning 4 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.77
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.62
Respect4.62
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.62
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
T. J. Mclemore 4 reported responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.80
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Katie Little 12 reported responses 2.98Eval / 5
Overall2.98 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.25
Technology2.65
Synthesis3.30
Collaboration2.50
Connection2.55
Contribution3.30
Discussion2.95
Inclusivity2.60
Grading2.80
Reflection3.05
Respect3.40
Creativity2.80
Feedback2.60
Interaction3.40
Challenge3.15
Questions3.60
Open full professor record
Lillian May Rothman 1 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration1.00
Connection1.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.