Course record ENGL
ENGL 2006
American Comics and Graphic Novels: An Ambivalent Art
University of Colorado Boulder
350 grades18 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2025
Flunk Score35/100
Below average
William Kuskin 350 grades · 1 term 3.13GPA
350 letter grades
4.1% withdrew · 15 of 365 enrolled.
Overall4.69 / 5
217 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.69
Synthesis4.87
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.66
Contribution4.71
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.86
Grading4.69
Reflection4.70
Respect4.86
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.76
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.82
Questions4.83
Madeline Eliza Hennessey 22 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.95
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.90
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.95
Grading4.70
Reflection4.90
Respect4.95
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Laurel Samuelson 17 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.60
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Matthew Austin 18 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.60
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.50
Reflection4.60
Respect4.70
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
Alessandro Sary 70 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
70 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.39
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration4.22
Connection4.14
Contribution4.62
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.40
Reflection4.29
Respect4.67
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.48
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.57
Questions4.57
Eilidh Strecker 17 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.50
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.50
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Nessa Dorsey 65 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
65 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.84
Technology4.86
Synthesis4.88
Collaboration3.89
Connection4.62
Contribution4.91
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.73
Grading4.61
Reflection4.82
Respect4.91
Creativity4.93
Feedback4.91
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.65
Questions4.70
Kim Harrer 59 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
59 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.10
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.40
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.60
Questions4.70
Madi Mcdermott 55 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
55 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.00
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.40
Reflection4.20
Respect4.50
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Julia Poetzinger 53 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5
53 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.10
Reflection4.20
Respect4.40
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.20
Questions4.40
Ashley Taylor 106 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5
106 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.09
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.82
Connection4.23
Contribution4.52
Discussion4.09
Inclusivity4.58
Grading4.17
Reflection4.35
Respect4.29
Creativity4.19
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.52
Challenge4.17
Questions4.17
Aisling Alvarez 72 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
72 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.60
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
Tucker Conine 69 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
69 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.40
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.50
Reflection4.60
Respect4.70
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.40
Questions4.60
Grace Donahue 63 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
63 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.40
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.70
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.60
Questions4.40
Dianne Inglis 56 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
56 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.40
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.30
Reflection4.50
Respect4.60
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions4.40
Noah Mahoney 56 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5
56 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.40
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.20
Reflection4.50
Respect4.40
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.20
Questions4.40
Patrick Ochoa 54 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5
54 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.30
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.10
Reflection4.40
Respect4.30
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.30
Questions4.20
Hannah Smith 54 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5
54 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.30
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.10
Reflection4.40
Respect4.30
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.30
Questions4.20
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.