Course record ENGL
ENGL 1250
Introduction to World Literature by Women
University of Colorado Boulder
551 grades18 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score55/100
Mixed record
Amanda L Hurtado 50 grades · 1 term 3.72GPA
50 letter grades
Compare with the course
Hurtado vs. the course average
A
+20.7
B
−17.1
C
−1.1
D
+0.5
F
−3.1
Difference in percentage points.
7.4% withdrew · 4 of 54 enrolled.
Rachel Franklin Wood 53 grades · 1 term 3.68GPA
53 letter grades
Compare with the course
Wood vs. the course average
A
+11.9
B
−0.2
C
−5.2
D
−1.5
F
−5.1
Difference in percentage points.
3.6% withdrew · 2 of 55 enrolled.
Overall4.38 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology3.90
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.95
Connection4.15
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.70
Grading3.90
Reflection4.50
Respect4.95
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.60
Questions4.25
Jenna Michaele Gersie 27 grades · 1 term 3.63GPA
27 letter grades
Compare with the course
Gersie vs. the course average
A
+14.1
B
−4.2
C
−7.1
D
−1.5
F
−1.4
Difference in percentage points.
3.6% withdrew · 1 of 28 enrolled.
Overall4.69 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.80
Questions4.70
Mairead Corrine Case 26 grades · 1 term 3.61GPA
26 letter grades
Compare with the course
Case vs. the course average
A
+5.7
B
+0.2
C
+0.6
D
−1.5
F
−5.1
Difference in percentage points.
3.7% withdrew · 1 of 27 enrolled.
Overall4.97 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.60
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.90
Connection5.00
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.90
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Jillian Heydt-Stevenson 40 grades · 1 term 3.56GPA
40 letter grades
Compare with the course
Heydt-Stevenson vs. the course average
A
+2.7
B
−1.6
C
+5.4
D
−1.5
F
−5.1
Difference in percentage points.
4.8% withdrew · 2 of 42 enrolled.
Overall4.19 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology2.90
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.60
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity4.70
Grading3.40
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.40
Questions4.10
Marie Jaquelin Pelzer 51 grades · 1 term 3.49GPA
51 letter grades
Compare with the course
Pelzer vs. the course average
A
+9.1
B
−5.3
C
−5.1
D
−1.5
F
+2.8
Difference in percentage points.
3.8% withdrew · 2 of 53 enrolled.
Camilla Brooks Mitchell 54 grades · 1 term 3.34GPA
54 letter grades
Compare with the course
Mitchell vs. the course average
A
−6.2
B
+6.9
C
+0.3
D
+0.4
F
−1.4
Difference in percentage points.
1.8% withdrew · 1 of 55 enrolled.
Jessica Lynn Lawson 134 grades · 1 term 3.20GPA
134 letter grades
Compare with the course
Lawson vs. the course average
A
−3.9
B
−0.4
C
−0.4
D
−1.5
F
+6.1
Difference in percentage points.
4.3% withdrew · 6 of 140 enrolled.
Overall4.82 / 5
45 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.93
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.91
Collaboration4.67
Connection4.86
Contribution4.96
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity4.94
Grading4.79
Reflection4.79
Respect4.94
Creativity4.69
Feedback4.83
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.87
Questions4.96
Devon Lamonte Keyes 50 grades · 1 term 3.18GPA
50 letter grades
Compare with the course
Keyes vs. the course average
A
−13.3
B
+4.9
C
+2.9
D
+6.5
F
−1.1
Difference in percentage points.
3.8% withdrew · 2 of 52 enrolled.
Overall4.47 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.55
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.90
Grading3.95
Reflection4.50
Respect4.85
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.35
Questions4.20
Elizabeth Anderman 35 grades · 1 term 3.15GPA
35 letter grades
Compare with the course
Anderman vs. the course average
A
−24.5
B
+26.7
C
+1.5
D
−1.5
F
−2.2
Difference in percentage points.
2.8% withdrew · 1 of 36 enrolled.
Overall4.73 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.99
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.99
Collaboration4.59
Connection4.79
Contribution4.99
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.89
Respect4.90
Creativity4.69
Feedback4.89
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.99
Questions4.80
Melodie A Roschman 31 grades · 1 term 2.96GPA
31 letter grades
Compare with the course
Roschman vs. the course average
A
−12.5
B
−6.2
C
+12.3
D
+5.0
F
+1.4
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 31 enrolled.
Overall4.82 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.35
Connection4.65
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.90
Reflection4.85
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.65
Questions5.00
Jill Ann Heydt 6 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology3.30
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.50
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.30
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.70
Questions4.00
Jaquelin Pelzer 12 reported responses 4.01Eval / 5
Overall4.01 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology3.65
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.15
Connection3.80
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.50
Grading3.60
Reflection4.25
Respect4.60
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.00
Questions3.95
Brooks Mitchell 25 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.87
Technology4.48
Synthesis4.89
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.81
Contribution4.95
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.78
Reflection4.88
Respect4.94
Creativity4.86
Feedback4.78
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.89
Questions4.89
Pilar Munoz 19 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.67
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.85
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.92
Grading4.57
Reflection4.85
Respect4.90
Creativity4.98
Feedback4.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.82
Questions4.92
Grace Rexroth 11 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.49
Synthesis4.69
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.80
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.69
Reflection4.69
Respect4.69
Creativity4.69
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.69
Challenge4.69
Questions4.69
Nancy Lee Rafferty-Jones 2 reported responses 3.40Eval / 5
Overall3.40 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology3.00
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration2.50
Connection5.00
Contribution3.50
Discussion3.50
Inclusivity5.00
Grading2.50
Reflection3.50
Respect4.50
Creativity4.00
Feedback2.50
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.50
Questions3.50
Shannon Rachel Leone 7 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.30
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.60
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.40
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.