Course record ENGL
ENGL 1191
Introduction to Creative Writing
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable60 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score55/100
Mixed record
Alaina Bainbridge 38 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
38 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.42
Technology4.46
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.42
Connection4.44
Contribution4.71
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity4.61
Grading4.36
Reflection4.38
Respect4.77
Creativity4.74
Feedback4.62
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.62
Questions4.81
Bailey Ashton Cochran 54 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
54 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.12
Technology3.81
Synthesis4.42
Collaboration4.61
Connection4.02
Contribution4.73
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.05
Reflection4.29
Respect4.57
Creativity4.68
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.29
Questions4.32
Kate Elizabeth Lu Sedor 31 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.26
Technology4.44
Synthesis4.49
Collaboration4.39
Connection4.32
Contribution4.69
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.58
Grading4.39
Reflection4.43
Respect4.87
Creativity4.66
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.40
Questions4.60
Shirin Chowdhury 35 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
35 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.79
Synthesis4.93
Collaboration4.54
Connection4.38
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity4.96
Grading4.97
Reflection4.62
Respect4.99
Creativity4.97
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.59
Challenge4.78
Questions4.99
Kristina Sergeevna Ten 51 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
51 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology4.39
Synthesis4.81
Collaboration4.69
Connection4.24
Contribution4.68
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.64
Grading4.54
Reflection4.77
Respect4.94
Creativity4.89
Feedback4.81
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.64
Questions4.84
John Pierre Mayer 48 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
48 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.02
Technology3.82
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.39
Connection4.23
Contribution4.82
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.86
Grading4.54
Reflection4.20
Respect5.00
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.92
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.66
Questions4.88
Cheryl Cummings 21 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.71
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.82
Collaboration4.37
Connection4.23
Contribution4.19
Discussion3.92
Inclusivity4.69
Grading4.56
Reflection4.67
Respect4.86
Creativity4.79
Feedback4.29
Interaction4.62
Challenge4.54
Questions4.14
Cara Lynn Albert 18 reported responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.36
Technology2.79
Synthesis4.39
Collaboration3.91
Connection2.87
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.42
Inclusivity4.22
Grading4.00
Reflection3.45
Respect4.43
Creativity4.74
Feedback4.03
Interaction4.41
Challenge3.44
Questions4.11
Lauren Jade Arnold 31 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.69
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.93
Collaboration4.46
Connection4.40
Contribution4.82
Discussion4.86
Inclusivity4.92
Grading4.81
Reflection4.68
Respect5.00
Creativity4.98
Feedback4.53
Interaction4.68
Challenge4.71
Questions4.80
Alex Kasanda Sardanis 49 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
49 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.68
Technology3.78
Synthesis4.86
Collaboration3.19
Connection4.69
Contribution4.32
Discussion4.38
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.91
Reflection4.74
Respect4.92
Creativity4.99
Feedback2.81
Interaction4.81
Challenge4.90
Questions4.38
Candace Rae Hicks 4 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.88
Collaboration4.38
Connection4.88
Contribution4.88
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.27
Reflection4.77
Respect4.88
Creativity4.88
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.88
Questions4.88
Anurag Andra 16 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.68
Technology4.19
Synthesis4.64
Collaboration3.32
Connection4.46
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.04
Inclusivity4.68
Grading4.63
Reflection4.61
Respect4.56
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.42
Interaction4.66
Challenge4.11
Questions4.91
Sabrina Canepa 14 reported responses 3.74Eval / 5
Overall3.74 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.57
Technology3.83
Synthesis4.09
Collaboration3.43
Connection4.05
Contribution4.48
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity3.57
Grading3.78
Reflection3.57
Respect4.55
Creativity4.52
Feedback3.87
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.65
Questions4.09
Rachel Franklin Wood 20 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.97
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.98
Collaboration3.00
Connection4.49
Contribution4.95
Discussion3.49
Inclusivity4.48
Grading3.99
Reflection4.47
Respect4.51
Creativity4.51
Feedback3.98
Interaction4.46
Challenge4.48
Questions4.00
Leah M White 8 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.40
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.50
Reflection4.40
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.15
Questions4.90
Bird Marathe 117 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
117 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.84
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.61
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.73
Grading4.76
Reflection4.79
Respect4.90
Creativity4.88
Feedback4.92
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.76
Questions4.95
Mackenzie Suess 5 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.30
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.40
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.60
Questions5.00
Kyle Joseph Kaczmarick 9 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.70
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.80
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.20
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Lillian May Rothman 22 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.52
Synthesis4.68
Collaboration4.44
Connection4.43
Contribution4.68
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.32
Reflection4.68
Respect4.85
Creativity4.82
Feedback4.67
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.62
Questions4.80
Riley Bartlett 3 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology3.00
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.70
Reflection3.70
Respect4.70
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.30
Challenge3.70
Questions4.30
Brian Fortune 11 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.02
Technology4.18
Synthesis4.95
Collaboration4.18
Connection3.84
Contribution4.46
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity3.88
Grading4.56
Reflection4.14
Respect4.77
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.44
Challenge4.75
Questions4.75
Isabel Geary Phelps 53 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
53 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.34
Technology4.61
Synthesis4.77
Collaboration4.58
Connection4.22
Contribution4.76
Discussion4.84
Inclusivity4.22
Grading4.48
Reflection4.57
Respect4.87
Creativity4.87
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.57
Questions4.84
Anjali Ravi 25 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.52
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.74
Collaboration4.63
Connection4.29
Contribution4.92
Discussion4.94
Inclusivity4.64
Grading4.73
Reflection4.36
Respect4.93
Creativity4.71
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.31
Questions4.87
Briana Gonzalez 43 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
43 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.44
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration4.71
Connection4.39
Contribution4.83
Discussion4.86
Inclusivity4.64
Grading4.81
Reflection4.67
Respect4.95
Creativity4.97
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.82
Questions4.85
Candace Nunag Tardio 18 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.54
Technology4.82
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.97
Connection4.57
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.87
Grading4.83
Reflection4.96
Respect4.90
Creativity4.87
Feedback4.84
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.77
Questions4.84
Isabel Beeman 31 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.68
Technology4.66
Synthesis4.76
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.53
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.84
Inclusivity4.58
Grading4.46
Reflection4.57
Respect4.98
Creativity4.92
Feedback4.83
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.62
Questions4.84
Jonathan Davis 45 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5
45 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.88
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.48
Collaboration3.50
Connection3.79
Contribution4.78
Discussion4.89
Inclusivity4.50
Grading3.01
Reflection3.89
Respect4.81
Creativity4.87
Feedback3.97
Interaction4.59
Challenge4.49
Questions3.98
Beau Farris 30 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.89
Technology4.83
Synthesis4.97
Collaboration4.86
Connection4.86
Contribution4.93
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.83
Grading4.90
Reflection4.83
Respect4.97
Creativity4.99
Feedback4.86
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.81
Questions4.82
Annabelle Praznik 41 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5
41 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology2.98
Synthesis4.19
Collaboration3.87
Connection3.54
Contribution4.69
Discussion3.14
Inclusivity3.78
Grading2.84
Reflection4.33
Respect4.42
Creativity3.99
Feedback2.54
Interaction4.31
Challenge3.86
Questions2.67
Isaac Rowlingson 44 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5
44 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.68
Technology4.66
Synthesis4.48
Collaboration4.63
Connection4.53
Contribution4.62
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity3.99
Grading4.07
Reflection4.42
Respect4.58
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.22
Interaction4.51
Challenge4.50
Questions4.60
Anna Sheffer 50 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
50 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.32
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.46
Connection3.98
Contribution4.84
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity4.48
Grading4.57
Reflection4.55
Respect4.86
Creativity4.87
Feedback4.56
Interaction4.81
Challenge4.55
Questions4.82
Emma Smith 80 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5
80 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.03
Synthesis4.41
Collaboration4.25
Connection3.50
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.62
Inclusivity3.89
Grading3.54
Reflection4.12
Respect3.99
Creativity4.45
Feedback3.93
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.09
Questions4.32
Jp Mayer 15 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.35
Connection4.45
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.80
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.55
Questions4.75
Lilly Rothman 51 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
51 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.32
Technology4.39
Synthesis4.46
Collaboration3.85
Connection3.65
Contribution4.79
Discussion4.69
Inclusivity4.04
Grading3.86
Reflection4.45
Respect4.86
Creativity4.89
Feedback4.48
Interaction4.86
Challenge3.95
Questions4.69
Michael Kerr 15 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.74
Technology4.27
Synthesis4.73
Collaboration4.74
Connection4.31
Contribution4.96
Discussion4.96
Inclusivity4.61
Grading4.18
Reflection4.92
Respect4.83
Creativity4.87
Feedback4.91
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.83
Questions4.87
Lukas Jedediah Devries 9 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.97
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.48
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.95
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.07
Grading3.28
Reflection4.48
Respect4.82
Creativity4.78
Feedback4.54
Interaction4.51
Challenge4.49
Questions4.49
Kika Meeks Dorsey 30 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.66
Technology4.05
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.28
Contribution4.87
Discussion4.89
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.41
Reflection4.85
Respect4.84
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.86
Questions4.82
Jessica Lynn Lawson 3 reported responses 3.60Eval / 5
Overall3.60 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.30
Connection4.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion2.30
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.00
Reflection3.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback2.30
Interaction5.00
Challenge2.30
Questions3.00
Emeka Joseph 45 reported responses 3.38Eval / 5
Overall3.38 / 5
45 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.38
Technology3.07
Synthesis3.76
Collaboration3.34
Connection3.16
Contribution3.89
Discussion3.39
Inclusivity4.29
Grading2.35
Reflection3.54
Respect3.94
Creativity4.07
Feedback3.51
Interaction3.86
Challenge3.54
Questions2.64
Matthew Leger 46 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
46 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.61
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.84
Collaboration4.51
Connection4.18
Contribution4.86
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.62
Grading4.77
Reflection4.49
Respect4.89
Creativity4.81
Feedback4.86
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.67
Questions4.84
Emily Spacek 53 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
53 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.68
Synthesis4.84
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.29
Contribution4.78
Discussion4.89
Inclusivity4.49
Grading4.59
Reflection4.71
Respect4.93
Creativity4.95
Feedback4.86
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.74
Questions4.86
Havilah Barnett 25 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.51
Technology4.51
Synthesis4.86
Collaboration3.64
Connection4.47
Contribution4.95
Discussion4.44
Inclusivity4.46
Grading4.17
Reflection4.52
Respect4.89
Creativity4.64
Feedback4.00
Interaction3.82
Challenge4.66
Questions4.52
Hannah Olsson 52 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
52 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.68
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.84
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.49
Contribution4.95
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.73
Grading4.82
Reflection4.53
Respect4.95
Creativity4.92
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.70
Questions4.92
Alaina Stellwagen 67 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
67 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.56
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.76
Collaboration4.52
Connection4.23
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.44
Grading4.52
Reflection4.65
Respect4.81
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.81
Challenge4.64
Questions4.72
Jordan Roubion 11 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.42
Technology4.11
Synthesis4.49
Collaboration3.97
Connection4.12
Contribution4.18
Discussion4.42
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.35
Reflection4.12
Respect4.26
Creativity4.46
Feedback4.11
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.42
Questions4.18
Zachary Rosenthal 28 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.49
Technology4.18
Synthesis4.66
Collaboration4.52
Connection4.74
Contribution4.49
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.60
Grading3.84
Reflection4.44
Respect4.54
Creativity4.19
Feedback4.27
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.57
Questions4.57
Jason Brandt Schaefer 11 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.40
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.70
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.80
Challenge5.00
Questions4.60
Daniella Castillo Vasquez 19 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.42
Technology4.37
Synthesis4.69
Collaboration4.51
Connection4.61
Contribution4.79
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.86
Reflection4.70
Respect4.98
Creativity4.97
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.89
Questions4.94
Lux Kickapoo-Johnson 26 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.48
Technology4.39
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.25
Connection4.06
Contribution4.73
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.58
Grading4.49
Reflection4.48
Respect4.61
Creativity4.67
Feedback4.76
Interaction4.76
Challenge4.57
Questions4.66
Alisa Caira 27 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.52
Synthesis4.81
Collaboration4.86
Connection4.65
Contribution4.91
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity4.77
Grading4.73
Reflection4.85
Respect4.78
Creativity4.88
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.81
Questions4.84
Katelynn Mulder 38 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
38 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.69
Synthesis4.72
Collaboration4.63
Connection4.28
Contribution4.76
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.53
Grading4.59
Reflection4.45
Respect4.90
Creativity4.94
Feedback4.82
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.80
Questions4.89
Annelise Freeze 66 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
66 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.46
Synthesis4.82
Collaboration4.53
Connection4.40
Contribution4.83
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.21
Reflection4.44
Respect4.82
Creativity4.72
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.51
Questions4.71
Marissa Sher 36 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.47
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.79
Connection4.61
Contribution4.86
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.72
Grading4.72
Reflection4.51
Respect4.92
Creativity4.67
Feedback4.38
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.75
Questions4.78
Raza Ali Hasan 4 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.20
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.50
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.00
Reflection4.80
Respect4.50
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Andie Weber 19 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.09
Connection4.40
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.46
Grading4.60
Reflection4.75
Respect4.80
Creativity4.82
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.58
Questions4.65
Rosaline Nizam 16 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.01
Technology4.09
Synthesis4.48
Collaboration4.27
Connection3.55
Contribution4.44
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.45
Grading4.02
Reflection4.12
Respect4.52
Creativity4.34
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.41
Questions4.27
Ahnivenitta Surratt 12 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.74
Synthesis4.91
Collaboration4.63
Connection4.65
Contribution4.95
Discussion4.86
Inclusivity4.51
Grading4.74
Reflection4.86
Respect4.88
Creativity4.83
Feedback4.83
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.83
Questions4.95
Maggie Rahilly 24 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.04
Contribution4.83
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.28
Grading4.71
Reflection4.32
Respect4.88
Creativity4.88
Feedback4.93
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.65
Questions4.98
Keira Deer 27 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.48
Technology4.68
Synthesis4.78
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.44
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.56
Grading4.81
Reflection4.60
Respect4.98
Creativity4.88
Feedback4.83
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.65
Questions4.93
Marshall Kopacki 13 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.65
Technology3.42
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration3.42
Connection3.32
Contribution4.98
Discussion3.46
Inclusivity3.39
Grading3.39
Reflection2.65
Respect4.98
Creativity4.23
Feedback3.46
Interaction4.95
Challenge3.42
Questions3.46
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.