Course record ENGL
ENGL 1001
Writing, Reading, Culture
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable34 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score58/100
Mixed record
Teresa Ann Lanpher 17 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration4.54
Connection4.39
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.54
Inclusivity4.28
Grading4.72
Reflection4.62
Respect4.75
Creativity4.28
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.46
Challenge4.49
Questions4.77
Jessica Lynn Lawson 30 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.98
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.97
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.96
Contribution4.99
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.98
Grading4.97
Reflection4.97
Respect4.97
Creativity4.98
Feedback4.93
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.97
Questions4.97
Stephen Jeffrey Mruzik 35 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
35 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.77
Collaboration4.09
Connection4.66
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.89
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.90
Reflection4.82
Respect4.78
Creativity4.88
Feedback4.88
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.77
Questions4.93
Melanie Catherine Lo 12 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.15
Connection4.70
Contribution4.95
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.95
Reflection4.95
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.95
Questions5.00
James Roland Carson 44 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
44 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.76
Technology4.56
Synthesis4.83
Collaboration4.66
Connection4.99
Contribution4.76
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.83
Grading4.40
Reflection4.66
Respect4.83
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.33
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.46
Questions4.47
Sang Hee Lee 6 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.85
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.85
Respect5.00
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Sarah Dawn Ramsey 60 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
60 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.69
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.52
Connection4.43
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.86
Inclusivity4.69
Grading4.62
Reflection4.76
Respect4.81
Creativity4.74
Feedback4.64
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.67
Questions4.78
Andrew Luis Escanuela 40 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.88
Technology4.61
Synthesis4.66
Collaboration4.52
Connection4.48
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.94
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.79
Reflection4.68
Respect4.92
Creativity4.78
Feedback4.93
Interaction4.58
Challenge4.81
Questions4.79
Grant Souders 6 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.70
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.00
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge5.00
Questions4.50
Teresa L Nugent 27 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.54
Technology4.99
Synthesis4.87
Collaboration4.04
Connection4.14
Contribution4.64
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.27
Grading4.68
Reflection4.52
Respect4.95
Creativity4.83
Feedback4.91
Interaction4.74
Challenge4.87
Questions4.92
Devon Lamonte Keyes 21 reported responses 4.04Eval / 5
Overall4.04 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.68
Technology2.80
Synthesis4.64
Collaboration3.59
Connection3.44
Contribution3.47
Discussion2.66
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.04
Reflection3.25
Respect2.84
Creativity4.01
Feedback3.26
Interaction3.86
Challenge2.80
Questions2.84
Riley Bartlett 14 reported responses 4.07Eval / 5
Overall4.07 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.41
Technology4.56
Synthesis4.72
Collaboration4.75
Connection3.95
Contribution4.91
Discussion4.12
Inclusivity4.86
Grading4.54
Reflection4.38
Respect4.91
Creativity4.65
Feedback3.34
Interaction4.84
Challenge3.84
Questions4.72
Stephanie Lynne Couey 5 reported responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.80
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.60
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.60
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.40
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.60
Questions5.00
Lukas Jedediah Devries 97 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
97 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.81
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration3.61
Connection4.48
Contribution4.92
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity4.81
Grading4.78
Reflection4.79
Respect4.94
Creativity4.88
Feedback4.59
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.88
Questions4.92
Hannah C Blanning 31 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology3.74
Synthesis4.49
Collaboration4.42
Connection3.96
Contribution4.49
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.61
Grading4.27
Reflection4.51
Respect4.76
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.58
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.50
Questions4.47
Dan Leamen 6 reported responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.30
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.80
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.70
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.80
Amanda L Hurtado 4 reported responses 3.47Eval / 5
Overall3.47 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.23
Technology4.08
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration4.23
Connection3.23
Contribution4.46
Discussion3.31
Inclusivity4.31
Grading3.77
Reflection3.77
Respect4.46
Creativity4.23
Feedback3.31
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.31
Questions3.54
Jason Brandt Schaefer 13 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.98
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.97
Collaboration4.97
Connection4.97
Contribution4.97
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.93
Grading4.95
Reflection4.94
Respect4.98
Creativity4.95
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.99
Questions4.99
Jaquelin Pelzer 17 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.47
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.23
Connection4.60
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.76
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.11
Reflection4.57
Respect4.87
Creativity4.45
Feedback3.78
Interaction4.54
Challenge4.43
Questions4.14
Stacey Leigh Milliken 42 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
42 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.91
Technology4.14
Synthesis4.81
Collaboration4.92
Connection4.12
Contribution4.89
Discussion4.51
Inclusivity4.89
Grading4.60
Reflection4.42
Respect4.88
Creativity4.91
Feedback3.87
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.92
Questions4.55
Bk Clapham 26 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.36
Technology4.21
Synthesis4.36
Collaboration4.26
Connection4.51
Contribution4.76
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.90
Grading2.96
Reflection3.63
Respect3.09
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.00
Interaction3.63
Challenge3.71
Questions4.24
John R Pugh 23 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.03
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.03
Connection4.61
Contribution4.74
Discussion4.29
Inclusivity4.14
Grading4.21
Reflection4.21
Respect4.11
Creativity4.11
Feedback3.44
Interaction4.32
Challenge3.88
Questions3.57
Jenna Michaele Gersie 7 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.91
Technology4.30
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.61
Contribution4.09
Discussion3.74
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.91
Reflection4.70
Respect4.09
Creativity4.61
Feedback4.61
Interaction3.39
Challenge4.39
Questions4.61
Jared Taylor 50 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
50 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology4.66
Synthesis4.69
Collaboration4.26
Connection4.27
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.74
Grading4.82
Reflection4.59
Respect4.84
Creativity4.69
Feedback4.68
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.78
Questions4.78
Kaige Sellers 19 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.21
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.58
Connection4.34
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.86
Inclusivity4.91
Grading4.67
Reflection4.73
Respect4.78
Creativity4.06
Feedback4.43
Interaction4.52
Challenge4.23
Questions4.42
Cass Eddington 7 reported responses 3.71Eval / 5
Overall3.71 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.82
Technology3.65
Synthesis3.65
Collaboration3.58
Connection3.77
Contribution3.51
Discussion3.46
Inclusivity3.58
Grading3.12
Reflection3.58
Respect3.88
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.42
Interaction3.46
Challenge3.58
Questions3.65
Pilar Munoz 12 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.00
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.35
Questions4.95
Anna Wingfield 3 reported responses 3.85Eval / 5
Overall3.85 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration1.75
Connection2.50
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.00
Reflection2.75
Respect3.75
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.25
Questions4.00
Michael Schrimper 10 reported responses 3.94Eval / 5
Overall3.94 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.19
Technology4.07
Synthesis4.26
Collaboration3.81
Connection4.16
Contribution3.81
Discussion4.19
Inclusivity4.04
Grading4.29
Reflection4.16
Respect3.84
Creativity4.32
Feedback4.47
Interaction3.19
Challenge4.13
Questions4.38
Nancy Lee Rafferty-Jones 17 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.79
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.79
Collaboration4.12
Connection4.58
Contribution4.68
Discussion4.86
Inclusivity4.77
Grading4.61
Reflection4.82
Respect4.86
Creativity4.64
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.77
Questions4.68
Olivia Mcclure 17 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.15
Connection4.10
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.75
Reflection4.45
Respect4.75
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.65
Questions4.75
Lillian May Rothman 10 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.70
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.60
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Lux Kickapoo-Johnson 3 reported responses 2.72Eval / 5
Overall2.72 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology2.00
Synthesis3.30
Collaboration1.00
Connection3.00
Contribution3.30
Discussion2.70
Inclusivity4.00
Grading2.30
Reflection3.00
Respect4.30
Creativity3.30
Feedback1.30
Interaction3.00
Challenge3.00
Questions2.00
Alaina Stellwagen 6 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.80
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.80
Grading5.00
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.