Course record ENES
ENES 1010
Humanity in a Technological Age
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable19 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score56/100
Mixed record
Paul Jordan Diduch 118 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
118 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.86
Technology3.86
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration3.87
Connection4.65
Contribution4.78
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.69
Grading3.90
Reflection4.78
Respect4.84
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.61
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.81
Questions4.77
H C F Fredricksmeyer 215 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
215 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.88
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.39
Connection4.67
Contribution4.88
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.71
Grading4.15
Reflection4.81
Respect4.84
Creativity4.66
Feedback4.68
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.83
Questions4.70
Sarah Stanford-Mcintyre 124 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
124 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.33
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.95
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity4.88
Grading4.61
Reflection4.99
Respect4.70
Creativity4.69
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.59
Challenge4.77
Questions4.84
Alexandre Priou 155 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
155 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.74
Technology3.72
Synthesis4.69
Collaboration3.99
Connection4.73
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.76
Inclusivity4.36
Grading3.80
Reflection4.87
Respect4.66
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.13
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.75
Questions4.78
Andrea Kowalchuk 104 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
104 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.81
Technology3.85
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.37
Connection4.78
Contribution4.79
Discussion4.89
Inclusivity4.56
Grading3.84
Reflection4.89
Respect4.70
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.71
Questions4.61
Aaron Kane Turner 229 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
229 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.74
Technology3.54
Synthesis4.76
Collaboration4.72
Connection4.41
Contribution4.84
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.27
Grading3.90
Reflection4.87
Respect4.66
Creativity4.57
Feedback4.22
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.83
Questions4.64
Roshanna Patricia Sylvester 110 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
110 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.83
Technology4.37
Synthesis4.42
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.65
Contribution4.76
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.62
Grading4.28
Reflection4.73
Respect4.75
Creativity4.59
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.67
Questions4.77
Leland Giovannelli 45 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
45 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.84
Collaboration4.79
Connection4.82
Contribution4.87
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.68
Grading4.73
Reflection4.89
Respect4.94
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.93
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.89
Anja K. Lange 30 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.88
Technology4.69
Synthesis4.88
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.55
Contribution4.87
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.94
Grading3.70
Reflection4.89
Respect4.90
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.09
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.80
Questions4.71
Lisa Malkanthi De Alwis 171 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
171 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology3.39
Synthesis4.48
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.44
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.38
Grading3.51
Reflection4.65
Respect4.66
Creativity4.44
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.75
Questions4.26
Diane Elizabeth Sieber 25 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.91
Technology4.39
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.54
Connection4.99
Contribution4.91
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.60
Grading3.93
Reflection4.99
Respect4.89
Creativity4.59
Feedback4.19
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.81
Angela Lea Thieman Dino 6 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.80
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.80
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Levente Szentkiralyi 19 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.75
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading3.70
Reflection4.80
Respect4.85
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.65
Questions4.55
Dan Leamen 20 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.55
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.50
Grading3.95
Reflection4.40
Respect4.75
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.60
Questions4.50
Marissa Elizabeth Grunes 88 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
88 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.57
Connection4.54
Contribution4.79
Discussion4.94
Inclusivity4.54
Grading4.39
Reflection4.70
Respect4.84
Creativity4.72
Feedback4.92
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.80
Questions4.86
James Steven Byrne 96 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
96 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration4.56
Connection4.39
Contribution4.66
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.45
Grading4.30
Reflection4.71
Respect4.75
Creativity4.58
Feedback4.66
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.63
Questions4.71
Catherine H Ambler 53 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
53 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology4.48
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.54
Connection4.74
Contribution4.68
Discussion4.84
Inclusivity4.54
Grading4.30
Reflection4.71
Respect4.70
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.62
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.49
Questions4.72
Pedro Asmar De Lucas Brea 13 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.70
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.00
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.50
Scot Ray Douglass 12 reported responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology3.55
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration4.48
Connection4.88
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.59
Grading3.38
Reflection4.73
Respect4.71
Creativity4.48
Feedback3.27
Interaction4.80
Challenge3.96
Questions4.66
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.