Course record EDUC
EDUC 2425
Foundations of Bilingual/Multicultural Education
University of Colorado Boulder
404 grades13 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score60/100
Strong
Molly Marie Hamm 25 grades · 1 term 3.82GPA
25 letter grades
Compare with the course
Hamm vs. the course average
A
+12.0
B
−3.8
C
−3.2
D
−1.2
F
−3.7
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 25 enrolled.
Overall4.94 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.98
Technology4.98
Synthesis4.95
Collaboration4.91
Connection4.98
Contribution4.95
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.95
Reflection4.95
Respect5.00
Creativity4.95
Feedback4.98
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.98
Questions5.00
Deena Alexandra Gumina 38 grades · 1 term 3.59GPA
38 letter grades
Compare with the course
Gumina vs. the course average
A
+4.3
B
−4.0
C
−0.6
D
+1.4
F
−1.1
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 38 enrolled.
Overall4.72 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.98
Technology4.87
Synthesis4.58
Collaboration4.49
Connection4.82
Contribution4.78
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.81
Reflection4.88
Respect5.00
Creativity4.67
Feedback4.48
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.78
Questions4.97
Rebecca Linares 68 grades · 1 term 3.57GPA
68 letter grades
Compare with the course
Linares vs. the course average
A
−1.4
B
+3.7
C
−0.3
D
+0.2
F
−2.2
Difference in percentage points.
5.6% withdrew · 4 of 72 enrolled.
Overall4.72 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.66
Connection4.96
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.86
Grading4.54
Reflection4.86
Respect4.99
Creativity4.42
Feedback4.64
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.70
Questions4.77
Daniel Martin Garzon 42 grades · 1 term 3.55GPA
42 letter grades
Compare with the course
Garzon vs. the course average
A
−5.4
B
+6.4
C
+1.5
D
−1.2
F
−1.3
Difference in percentage points.
2.3% withdrew · 1 of 43 enrolled.
Overall4.37 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.03
Technology4.12
Synthesis3.92
Collaboration4.12
Connection4.51
Contribution3.54
Discussion4.03
Inclusivity4.61
Grading3.44
Reflection4.22
Respect4.71
Creativity3.73
Feedback3.54
Interaction4.22
Challenge3.53
Questions3.83
Mileidis Gort 123 grades · 1 term 3.54GPA
123 letter grades
Compare with the course
Gort vs. the course average
A
+0.3
B
−0.3
C
+0.8
D
−0.4
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
2.4% withdrew · 3 of 126 enrolled.
Overall4.54 / 5
95 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.69
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.92
Contribution4.79
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity4.83
Grading4.63
Reflection4.78
Respect4.85
Creativity4.28
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.60
Questions4.77
Vanessa S Schwarz 50 grades · 1 term 3.15GPA
50 letter grades
Compare with the course
Schwarz vs. the course average
A
−16.0
B
+6.2
C
+0.8
D
+2.8
F
+6.3
Difference in percentage points.
2.0% withdrew · 1 of 51 enrolled.
Overall4.53 / 5
54 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.61
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.48
Collaboration4.31
Connection4.54
Contribution4.41
Discussion4.76
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.13
Reflection4.70
Respect4.78
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.22
Interaction4.81
Challenge4.48
Questions4.64
Astrid Nicholl Sambolin-Morales 23 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.90GPA
23 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 23 enrolled.
Mary Snow 17 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.59GPA
17 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 17 enrolled.
Overall4.60 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.72
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.07
Connection4.82
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.98
Grading4.21
Reflection4.78
Respect4.85
Creativity4.39
Feedback4.11
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.75
Questions4.52
Teresa Marie Warkentin 18 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.39GPA
18 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 18 enrolled.
Overall4.79 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.70
Reflection5.00
Respect4.70
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions4.70
Stephany Caceres Mateo 32 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.85
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.70
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.60
Questions4.75
Gabriela Iturralde 9 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.80
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.10
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.80
Questions4.30
Adria M Padilla-Chavez 4 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.80
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Laura Meinzen 20 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.80
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.