Course record ECON

ECON 7030

Microeconomic Theory 2

University of Colorado Boulder

72 grades14 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score59/100
Mixed record

Professors 14 of 14

Yongmin Chen 25 grades · 1 term 3.53GPA
48.0% A
52.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

25 letter grades

Compare with the course
Chen vs. the course average
A +2.2
B −0.8
C −1.4
D same
F same

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 25 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Oleg Valeryevich Baranov 47 grades · 1 term 3.34GPA
44.7% A
53.2% B
2.1% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

47 letter grades

Compare with the course
Baranov vs. the course average
A −1.2
B +0.4
C +0.7
D same
F same

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 47 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Joseph Patrick Fry 11 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.80
Reflection4.70
Respect4.60
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Dongkyu Yang 11 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.30
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Lucas Michael Ladenburger 12 reported responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.70
Contribution4.60
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Paro Paul Suh 12 reported responses 4.92Eval / 5
Overall4.92 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.70
Contribution4.60
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Danielle Parks 8 reported responses 4.99Eval / 5
Overall4.99 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.80
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.40
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Jiyun Kim 8 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.80
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.80
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.90
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Tyler Anderson 8 reported responses 4.97Eval / 5
Overall4.97 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.90
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.90
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Boyang Yu 8 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.20
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.90
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.20
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.20
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.20
Questions4.20
Open full professor record
Jack Krolak 12 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology5.00
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.10
Connection3.80
Contribution4.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.40
Grading5.00
Reflection4.30
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.40
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Ernesto Rivera Mora 23 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.11
Collaboration4.33
Connection4.26
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.19
Reflection4.45
Respect4.42
Creativity4.19
Feedback4.31
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.15
Questions4.62
Open full professor record
Megan Rice 11 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.40
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.40
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Qian Yong 10 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.80
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Show fewer
Course documents

Syllabi 2

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Spring 2026 · Section not specified

Ernesto Rivera Mora

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.