Course record ECON

ECON 3545

Environmental Economics

University of Colorado Boulder

574 grades20 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score21/100
Below average

Professors 20 of 20

Grant G Webster 79 grades · 1 term 2.94GPA
32.9% A
40.5% B
19.0% C
7.6% D
0.0% F

79 letter grades

Compare with the course
Webster vs. the course average
A +1.7
B +1.5
C −0.9
D +1.7
F −4.0

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 79 enrolled.

Christian Payne Hennigan 51 grades · 1 term 2.93GPA
49.0% A
27.5% B
3.9% C
9.8% D
9.8% F

51 letter grades

Compare with the course
Hennigan vs. the course average
A +17.8
B −11.6
C −15.9
D +3.9
F +5.8

Difference in percentage points.

8.9% withdrew · 5 of 56 enrolled.

Austin Tyler Kennedy 157 grades · 1 term 2.92GPA
31.2% A
42.7% B
19.7% C
2.5% D
3.8% F

157 letter grades

Compare with the course
Kennedy vs. the course average
A same
B +3.7
C −0.1
D −3.4
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 157 enrolled.

Jonathan Edward Hughes 36 grades · 1 term 2.91GPA
30.6% A
47.2% B
13.9% C
5.6% D
2.8% F

36 letter grades

Compare with the course
Hughes vs. the course average
A −0.6
B +8.2
C −6.0
D −0.4
F −1.2

Difference in percentage points.

10.0% withdrew · 4 of 40 enrolled.

Alexander S Cauley 77 grades · 1 term 2.88GPA
32.5% A
36.4% B
23.4% C
2.6% D
5.2% F

77 letter grades

Compare with the course
Cauley vs. the course average
A +1.3
B −2.7
C +3.5
D −3.3
F +1.2

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 77 enrolled.

Stephanie Weber 44 grades · 1 term 2.76GPA
29.5% A
40.9% B
18.2% C
4.5% D
6.8% F

44 letter grades

Compare with the course
Weber vs. the course average
A −1.6
B +1.9
C −1.7
D −1.4
F +2.8

Difference in percentage points.

10.2% withdrew · 5 of 49 enrolled.

Wenbo Meng 59 grades · 1 term 2.67GPA
28.8% A
33.9% B
22.0% C
11.9% D
3.4% F

59 letter grades

Compare with the course
Meng vs. the course average
A −2.4
B −5.1
C +2.2
D +5.9
F −0.6

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 59 enrolled.

Kevin Wayne Starnes 71 grades · 1 term 2.59GPA
18.3% A
39.4% B
31.0% C
8.5% D
2.8% F

71 letter grades

Compare with the course
Starnes vs. the course average
A −12.9
B +0.4
C +11.1
D +2.5
F −1.2

Difference in percentage points.

5.3% withdrew · 4 of 75 enrolled.

Rimjhim Saxena 47 reported responses 3.99Eval / 5
Overall3.99 / 5

47 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology4.50
Synthesis3.73
Collaboration2.90
Connection4.25
Contribution3.44
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity3.63
Grading4.22
Reflection4.28
Respect4.65
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.21
Challenge4.05
Questions4.48
Sara Avila Forcada 26 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5

26 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.48
Technology4.33
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.52
Connection4.45
Contribution4.38
Discussion4.58
Inclusivity4.36
Grading4.02
Reflection4.38
Respect4.90
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.18
Interaction4.58
Challenge4.20
Questions4.55
Alexander Mcgavock Hill 19 reported responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.50
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity3.70
Grading3.90
Reflection3.90
Respect4.50
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.20
Questions4.20
Sean Holland Strunk 48 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5

48 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.80
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.70
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Dongkyu Yang 81 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

81 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.18
Collaboration4.17
Connection4.87
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.38
Reflection4.38
Respect4.59
Creativity4.19
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.69
Challenge4.67
Questions4.68
Benjamin Wei Yao Zhang 52 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5

52 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology3.80
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.80
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.20
Reflection4.60
Respect4.60
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.20
Questions4.30
Elizabeth Anne Sorensen Montoya 26 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5

26 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.90
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.50
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.50
Questions4.70
Jack Krolak 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Pan Chen 17 reported responses 4.04Eval / 5
Overall4.04 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.30
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration3.40
Connection4.20
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.10
Reflection4.00
Respect4.20
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.10
Interaction3.90
Challenge4.10
Questions4.30
Seungmin Baek 11 reported responses 3.42Eval / 5
Overall3.42 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.40
Technology3.50
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration2.60
Connection4.40
Contribution2.90
Discussion3.50
Inclusivity3.70
Grading3.60
Reflection3.20
Respect4.60
Creativity2.80
Feedback2.50
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.40
Questions3.80
Leo Zhang 11 reported responses 3.53Eval / 5
Overall3.53 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.40
Technology3.80
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration2.60
Connection4.40
Contribution2.90
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity3.70
Grading3.50
Reflection3.20
Respect4.60
Creativity3.10
Feedback2.80
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.70
Questions3.80
Fengyu Zhang 2 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.50
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.00
Respect4.50
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.00
Questions4.50
Show fewer
Course documents

Syllabi 5

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Fall 2026 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Spring 2026 · Section not specified

Liaoyuan (Leo) Zhang

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
2 more syllabi

Fall 2024 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Spring 2024 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.