Course record ECON

ECON 3070

Intermediate Microeconomic Theory

University of Colorado Boulder

1,489 grades55 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score16/100
Needs work

Professors 55 of 55

Sutianjie Zhou 26 grades · 1 term 3.31GPA
53.8% A
30.8% B
11.5% C
0.0% D
3.8% F

26 letter grades

Compare with the course
Zhou vs. the course average
A +24.5
B +0.5
C −16.9
D −4.6
F −3.5

Difference in percentage points.

10.3% withdrew · 3 of 29 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Minghui Li 46 grades · 1 term 3.01GPA
39.1% A
37.0% B
19.6% C
0.0% D
4.3% F

46 letter grades

Compare with the course
Li vs. the course average
A +9.8
B +6.7
C −8.9
D −4.6
F −3.0

Difference in percentage points.

2.1% withdrew · 1 of 47 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Charles A M De Bartolome 78 grades · 1 term 2.95GPA
33.3% A
33.3% B
30.8% C
2.6% D
0.0% F

78 letter grades

Compare with the course
Bartolome vs. the course average
A +4.0
B +3.1
C +2.3
D −2.1
F −7.3

Difference in percentage points.

6.0% withdrew · 5 of 83 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Paro Paul Suh 128 grades · 1 term 2.81GPA
34.4% A
21.1% B
36.7% C
5.5% D
2.3% F

128 letter grades

Compare with the course
Suh vs. the course average
A +5.0
B −9.1
C +8.2
D +0.8
F −5.0

Difference in percentage points.

2.3% withdrew · 3 of 131 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Daria Bottan 168 grades · 1 term 2.80GPA
36.9% A
29.2% B
23.8% C
1.8% D
8.3% F

168 letter grades

Compare with the course
Bottan vs. the course average
A +7.6
B −1.1
C −4.7
D −2.8
F +1.0

Difference in percentage points.

2.9% withdrew · 5 of 173 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Michael Karas 43 grades · 1 term 2.80GPA
34.9% A
34.9% B
16.3% C
7.0% D
7.0% F

43 letter grades

Compare with the course
Karas vs. the course average
A +5.5
B +4.7
C −12.2
D +2.3
F −0.3

Difference in percentage points.

4.4% withdrew · 2 of 45 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Matthew R Hurt 29 grades · 1 term 2.79GPA
27.6% A
31.0% B
37.9% C
3.4% D
0.0% F

29 letter grades

Compare with the course
Hurt vs. the course average
A −1.8
B +0.8
C +9.5
D −1.2
F −7.3

Difference in percentage points.

3.3% withdrew · 1 of 30 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Jieun Lee 39 grades · 1 term 2.77GPA
28.2% A
35.9% B
28.2% C
0.0% D
7.7% F

39 letter grades

Compare with the course
Lee vs. the course average
A −1.1
B +5.7
C −0.3
D −4.6
F +0.4

Difference in percentage points.

2.5% withdrew · 1 of 40 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Yongmin Chen 111 grades · 1 term 2.68GPA
20.7% A
42.3% B
31.5% C
0.9% D
4.5% F

111 letter grades

Compare with the course
Chen vs. the course average
A −8.6
B +12.1
C +3.1
D −3.7
F −2.8

Difference in percentage points.

8.3% withdrew · 10 of 121 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Corey Daniel Woodruff 45 grades · 1 term 2.66GPA
28.9% A
31.1% B
26.7% C
6.7% D
6.7% F

45 letter grades

Compare with the course
Woodruff vs. the course average
A −0.5
B +0.9
C −1.8
D +2.0
F −0.7

Difference in percentage points.

8.2% withdrew · 4 of 49 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Namsuk Choi 42 grades · 1 term 2.66GPA
7.1% A
54.8% B
35.7% C
2.4% D
0.0% F

42 letter grades

Compare with the course
Choi vs. the course average
A −22.2
B +24.5
C +7.2
D −2.3
F −7.3

Difference in percentage points.

8.7% withdrew · 4 of 46 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Colin L Jareb 80 grades · 1 term 2.65GPA
27.5% A
32.5% B
28.7% C
5.0% D
6.3% F

80 letter grades

Compare with the course
Jareb vs. the course average
A −1.8
B +2.3
C +0.3
D +0.4
F −1.1

Difference in percentage points.

4.8% withdrew · 4 of 84 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Richard Kennard Mansfield 383 grades · 1 term 2.55GPA
26.6% A
27.4% B
32.9% C
2.9% D
10.2% F

383 letter grades

Compare with the course
Mansfield vs. the course average
A −2.7
B −2.8
C +4.4
D −1.8
F +2.9

Difference in percentage points.

8.6% withdrew · 36 of 419 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Kyle F Butts 25 grades · 1 term 2.54GPA
28.0% A
32.0% B
12.0% C
20.0% D
8.0% F

25 letter grades

Compare with the course
Butts vs. the course average
A −1.3
B +1.8
C −16.5
D +15.4
F +0.7

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 25 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Tania C.J. Barham 159 grades · 1 term 2.50GPA
26.4% A
29.6% B
25.8% C
10.1% D
8.2% F

159 letter grades

Compare with the course
Barham vs. the course average
A −2.9
B −0.7
C −2.7
D +5.4
F +0.9

Difference in percentage points.

7.0% withdrew · 12 of 171 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Aolin Li 44 grades · 1 term 2.43GPA
36.4% A
18.2% B
18.2% C
13.6% D
13.6% F

44 letter grades

Compare with the course
Li vs. the course average
A +7.0
B −12.0
C −10.3
D +9.0
F +6.3

Difference in percentage points.

6.4% withdrew · 3 of 47 enrolled.

Open full professor record
William G Mertens 25 grades · 1 term 1.73GPA
24.0% A
8.0% B
24.0% C
12.0% D
32.0% F

25 letter grades

Compare with the course
Mertens vs. the course average
A −5.3
B −22.2
C −4.5
D +7.4
F +24.7

Difference in percentage points.

7.4% withdrew · 2 of 27 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Saigeetha Narasimhan 18 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 2.38GPA
27.8% A
27.8% B
16.7% C
16.7% D
11.1% F

18 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 18 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Brian Flaxman 78 reported responses 3.18Eval / 5
Overall3.18 / 5

78 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.17
Technology3.37
Synthesis3.18
Collaboration2.33
Connection3.78
Contribution2.23
Discussion3.02
Inclusivity3.05
Grading3.25
Reflection3.38
Respect3.88
Creativity3.08
Feedback3.12
Interaction3.12
Challenge3.18
Questions3.48
Open full professor record
Danny Kurban 18 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.32
Synthesis4.13
Collaboration4.19
Connection4.00
Contribution4.83
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.51
Grading4.74
Reflection4.24
Respect4.89
Creativity4.08
Feedback3.68
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.13
Questions4.94
Open full professor record
Peiyuan Li 45 reported responses 4.03Eval / 5
Overall4.03 / 5

45 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.86
Technology3.98
Synthesis3.72
Collaboration3.48
Connection4.00
Contribution3.53
Discussion4.05
Inclusivity3.78
Grading3.99
Reflection4.25
Respect4.54
Creativity3.76
Feedback3.89
Interaction4.28
Challenge4.05
Questions4.34
Open full professor record
Benjamin Wei Yao Zhang 25 reported responses 3.95Eval / 5
Overall3.95 / 5

25 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.46
Collaboration3.81
Connection4.41
Contribution4.24
Discussion4.58
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.19
Reflection4.53
Respect4.64
Creativity4.67
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.52
Challenge4.48
Questions4.61
Open full professor record
Jiannan Zhou 19 reported responses 3.58Eval / 5
Overall3.58 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology4.37
Synthesis3.04
Collaboration3.15
Connection3.43
Contribution3.63
Discussion4.17
Inclusivity3.13
Grading3.54
Reflection3.91
Respect4.28
Creativity3.63
Feedback3.23
Interaction4.43
Challenge3.74
Questions3.98
Open full professor record
Karen Susan Gebhardt 46 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5

46 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.79
Synthesis4.11
Collaboration3.35
Connection4.63
Contribution4.02
Discussion4.31
Inclusivity3.86
Grading4.74
Reflection4.60
Respect4.58
Creativity4.12
Feedback4.36
Interaction4.22
Challenge4.62
Questions4.67
Open full professor record
Connor Hayes 16 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.95
Connection4.75
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.95
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.60
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Sara Avila Forcada 50 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5

50 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.23
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.06
Collaboration3.64
Connection4.37
Contribution3.85
Discussion4.47
Inclusivity4.27
Grading4.46
Reflection4.30
Respect4.66
Creativity4.06
Feedback4.12
Interaction4.34
Challenge4.44
Questions4.64
Open full professor record
Mariya Burdina 24 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5

24 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.50
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.60
Respect4.70
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.30
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Xiaomeng Zhao 6 reported responses 3.31Eval / 5
Overall3.31 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology3.65
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration2.40
Connection2.90
Contribution2.50
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity2.90
Grading3.00
Reflection3.65
Respect3.85
Creativity3.00
Feedback2.50
Interaction4.35
Challenge3.65
Questions3.90
Open full professor record
Mengqi Zhang 21 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology3.80
Synthesis4.28
Collaboration3.78
Connection4.05
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.07
Grading4.45
Reflection4.63
Respect4.85
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.63
Questions4.55
Open full professor record
Kevin Wayne Starnes 60 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5

60 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.13
Technology3.66
Synthesis4.01
Collaboration3.16
Connection4.10
Contribution3.79
Discussion4.16
Inclusivity3.76
Grading4.32
Reflection4.27
Respect4.67
Creativity3.94
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.23
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Open full professor record
Alexander Hayes Bentz 21 reported responses 3.49Eval / 5
Overall3.49 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.94
Technology4.05
Synthesis3.72
Collaboration2.99
Connection3.44
Contribution3.79
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.91
Grading4.43
Reflection3.96
Respect4.83
Creativity3.74
Feedback4.00
Interaction3.89
Challenge4.12
Questions4.51
Open full professor record
Austin Tyler Kennedy 16 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.25
Connection4.65
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.45
Grading4.45
Reflection4.70
Respect4.85
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Sean Holland Strunk 16 reported responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.02
Technology4.33
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration2.75
Connection3.72
Contribution4.03
Discussion4.41
Inclusivity2.79
Grading3.81
Reflection4.06
Respect4.17
Creativity3.63
Feedback3.36
Interaction4.01
Challenge4.09
Questions4.37
Open full professor record
Mark Valkovci 255 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5

255 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.31
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.07
Collaboration3.58
Connection4.41
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.61
Inclusivity4.29
Grading4.35
Reflection4.31
Respect4.64
Creativity4.45
Feedback3.89
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.63
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Yan Zhan 31 reported responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5

31 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology4.35
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.65
Connection3.70
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.40
Grading3.85
Reflection4.10
Respect4.45
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.25
Questions4.15
Open full professor record
Jerald Katz 9 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.10
Contribution3.95
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.25
Grading4.15
Reflection4.30
Respect4.65
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.30
Questions4.15
Open full professor record
Ryuta Akino 27 reported responses 4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5

27 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.03
Collaboration3.74
Connection4.35
Contribution3.89
Discussion4.14
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.43
Reflection4.57
Respect4.27
Creativity3.63
Feedback4.11
Interaction4.42
Challenge4.49
Questions4.33
Open full professor record
Sungyoun Chung 11 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.95
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.90
Contribution4.75
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.85
Reflection5.00
Respect4.90
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.95
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Lilla Lukacs Marein 37 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5

37 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.29
Technology4.49
Synthesis4.12
Collaboration3.48
Connection4.55
Contribution3.89
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity3.88
Grading4.55
Reflection4.47
Respect4.50
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.82
Interaction4.51
Challenge4.55
Questions4.59
Open full professor record
Jiyun Kim 21 reported responses 3.82Eval / 5
Overall3.82 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.84
Technology4.48
Synthesis3.87
Collaboration1.97
Connection3.32
Contribution3.22
Discussion3.94
Inclusivity2.95
Grading3.60
Reflection4.15
Respect4.39
Creativity3.37
Feedback4.31
Interaction3.76
Challenge4.32
Questions4.46
Open full professor record
Joseph Patrick Fry 20 reported responses 4.18Eval / 5
Overall4.18 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.40
Connection4.10
Contribution3.95
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.35
Reflection4.50
Respect4.65
Creativity4.35
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.30
Questions4.40
Open full professor record
Michelle Ko 15 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.65
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.75
Reflection4.95
Respect4.85
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.75
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Grant G Webster 12 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.45
Connection4.70
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.85
Reflection4.75
Respect4.75
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.75
Questions4.75
Open full professor record
Chunyang Huang 28 reported responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5

28 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration3.30
Connection3.75
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity3.85
Grading4.20
Reflection4.40
Respect4.60
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.45
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Leo Zhang 11 reported responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.50
Contribution4.30
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity4.05
Grading3.85
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.55
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.25
Questions4.05
Open full professor record
Jack Novak 13 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology3.85
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration2.65
Connection3.65
Contribution3.65
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.50
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity3.40
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.60
Questions4.95
Open full professor record
Joey Kilpatrick 6 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.85
Connection4.40
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.40
Grading5.00
Reflection4.65
Respect4.85
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.65
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Mate Istvan Szurop 7 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology3.85
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.55
Contribution3.95
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.85
Grading4.60
Reflection4.75
Respect4.35
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.75
Questions4.75
Open full professor record
Jisu Yu 7 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration3.65
Connection3.75
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.40
Reflection4.35
Respect4.90
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.15
Challenge4.45
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Bikalpa Baniya 14 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.80
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.10
Reflection4.40
Respect4.40
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.10
Questions4.40
Open full professor record
Lucas Michael Ladenburger 9 reported responses 4.15Eval / 5
Overall4.15 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.40
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.90
Grading3.85
Reflection4.80
Respect4.30
Creativity3.10
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.05
Challenge4.30
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Sara Truesdale 30 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5

30 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.30
Connection4.30
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.50
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.50
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Tyler Anderson 13 reported responses 4.06Eval / 5
Overall4.06 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology4.55
Synthesis3.95
Collaboration3.35
Connection4.45
Contribution3.60
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.00
Reflection4.30
Respect4.60
Creativity3.55
Feedback4.15
Interaction3.90
Challenge4.20
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Sheng Qu 10 reported responses 4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration2.85
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity3.75
Grading4.25
Reflection4.50
Respect4.30
Creativity3.60
Feedback4.40
Interaction3.85
Challenge4.25
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Megan Rice 2 reported responses 3.57Eval / 5
Overall3.57 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Grading1.00
Reflection3.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.00
Interaction3.50
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Show fewer
Course documents

Syllabi 20

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Fall 2026 · Section not specified

Professor Richard Mansfield

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Fall 2026 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
17 more syllabi

Spring 2026 · Section 020

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Fall 2024 · Section not specified

Professor Richard Mansfield

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Fall 2024 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Fall 2024 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Spring 2024 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Spring 2024 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Spring 2024 · Section not specified

Dr. Billy Mertens

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Spring 2024 · Section not specified

Dr. Lilla Marein

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.