Course record ECON

ECON 2020

Principles of Macroeconomics

University of Colorado Boulder

8,204 grades97 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score18/100
Needs work

Professors 97 of 97

Dan J Zuchegno 99 grades · 1 term 3.52GPA
62.6% A
31.3% B
3.0% C
2.0% D
1.0% F

99 letter grades

Compare with the course
Zuchegno vs. the course average
A +26.0
B −8.2
C −12.2
D −4.0
F −1.6

Difference in percentage points.

2.0% withdrew · 2 of 101 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Mark M Evers 33 grades · 1 term 3.45GPA
60.6% A
30.3% B
3.0% C
6.1% D
0.0% F

33 letter grades

Compare with the course
Evers vs. the course average
A +23.9
B −9.2
C −12.2
D +0.1
F −2.6

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 33 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Pooja Kashyap 72 grades · 1 term 3.33GPA
50.0% A
44.4% B
4.2% C
1.4% D
0.0% F

72 letter grades

Compare with the course
Kashyap vs. the course average
A +13.3
B +4.9
C −11.0
D −4.6
F −2.6

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 72 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Ali Almelhem 224 grades · 1 term 3.28GPA
47.8% A
37.5% B
13.8% C
0.9% D
0.0% F

224 letter grades

Compare with the course
Almelhem vs. the course average
A +11.1
B −2.0
C −1.4
D −5.1
F −2.6

Difference in percentage points.

2.2% withdrew · 5 of 229 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Loren D Kruschke 196 grades · 1 term 3.16GPA
46.9% A
31.6% B
13.8% C
6.1% D
1.5% F

196 letter grades

Compare with the course
Kruschke vs. the course average
A +10.3
B −7.9
C −1.4
D +0.1
F −1.0

Difference in percentage points.

2.5% withdrew · 5 of 201 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Matthew M Van Wyhe 39 grades · 1 term 3.12GPA
48.7% A
33.3% B
10.3% C
5.1% D
2.6% F

39 letter grades

Compare with the course
Wyhe vs. the course average
A +12.1
B −6.2
C −5.0
D −0.9
F same

Difference in percentage points.

4.9% withdrew · 2 of 41 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Mark Valkovci 2,328 grades · 1 term 3.09GPA
43.0% A
35.7% B
12.4% C
6.1% D
2.7% F

2,328 letter grades

Compare with the course
Valkovci vs. the course average
A +6.4
B −3.8
C −2.8
D +0.1
F +0.1

Difference in percentage points.

2.0% withdrew · 47 of 2,375 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Fevzi Murat Iyigun 2,109 grades · 1 term 3.08GPA
40.0% A
39.9% B
12.8% C
4.6% D
2.7% F

2,109 letter grades

Compare with the course
Iyigun vs. the course average
A +3.3
B +0.4
C −2.4
D −1.4
F +0.1

Difference in percentage points.

1.6% withdrew · 34 of 2,143 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Jennifer Lynn Klein 143 grades · 1 term 3.06GPA
35.0% A
44.1% B
16.1% C
3.5% D
1.4% F

143 letter grades

Compare with the course
Klein vs. the course average
A −1.7
B +4.5
C +0.9
D −2.5
F −1.2

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 143 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Mate Istvan Szurop 84 grades · 1 term 2.94GPA
28.6% A
46.4% B
21.4% C
1.2% D
2.4% F

84 letter grades

Compare with the course
Szurop vs. the course average
A −8.1
B +6.9
C +6.2
D −4.8
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

6.7% withdrew · 6 of 90 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Alessandro Peri 1,267 grades · 1 term 2.93GPA
29.0% A
46.7% B
17.1% C
5.9% D
1.3% F

1,267 letter grades

Compare with the course
Peri vs. the course average
A −7.7
B +7.2
C +1.9
D −0.1
F −1.3

Difference in percentage points.

1.6% withdrew · 20 of 1,287 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Jacob Bryan Howard 221 grades · 1 term 2.83GPA
32.6% A
41.2% B
14.0% C
9.5% D
2.7% F

221 letter grades

Compare with the course
Howard vs. the course average
A −4.1
B +1.6
C −1.2
D +3.5
F +0.1

Difference in percentage points.

3.5% withdrew · 8 of 229 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Weizhao Sun 85 grades · 1 term 2.83GPA
36.5% A
38.8% B
10.6% C
7.1% D
7.1% F

85 letter grades

Compare with the course
Sun vs. the course average
A −0.2
B −0.7
C −4.6
D +1.0
F +4.5

Difference in percentage points.

1.2% withdrew · 1 of 86 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Chad Allan Brown 205 grades · 1 term 2.74GPA
26.3% A
37.1% B
26.3% C
7.3% D
2.9% F

205 letter grades

Compare with the course
Brown vs. the course average
A −10.3
B −2.5
C +11.1
D +1.3
F +0.4

Difference in percentage points.

0.5% withdrew · 1 of 206 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Michael Karas 164 grades · 1 term 2.73GPA
28.7% A
40.9% B
14.6% C
9.1% D
6.7% F

164 letter grades

Compare with the course
Karas vs. the course average
A −8.0
B +1.3
C −0.6
D +3.1
F +4.1

Difference in percentage points.

3.0% withdrew · 5 of 169 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Elizabeth Anne Sorensen Montoya 201 grades · 1 term 2.67GPA
20.9% A
39.3% B
29.4% C
8.5% D
2.0% F

201 letter grades

Compare with the course
Montoya vs. the course average
A −15.8
B −0.2
C +14.1
D +2.4
F −0.6

Difference in percentage points.

2.4% withdrew · 5 of 206 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Alexander Hayes Bentz 339 grades · 1 term 2.62GPA
19.8% A
41.9% B
23.3% C
11.5% D
3.5% F

339 letter grades

Compare with the course
Bentz vs. the course average
A −16.9
B +2.3
C +8.1
D +5.5
F +1.0

Difference in percentage points.

4.0% withdrew · 14 of 353 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Aolin Li 180 grades · 1 term 2.54GPA
23.9% A
35.0% B
20.6% C
13.9% D
6.7% F

180 letter grades

Compare with the course
Li vs. the course average
A −12.8
B −4.5
C +5.3
D +7.9
F +4.1

Difference in percentage points.

2.2% withdrew · 4 of 184 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Vincent Mastantuno 198 grades · 1 term 2.52GPA
9.6% A
46.0% B
34.3% C
6.6% D
3.5% F

198 letter grades

Compare with the course
Mastantuno vs. the course average
A −27.1
B +6.4
C +19.1
D +0.6
F +1.0

Difference in percentage points.

0.5% withdrew · 1 of 199 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Kishore G Kulkarni 17 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.10GPA
64.7% A
11.8% B
5.9% C
5.9% D
11.8% F

17 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 17 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Connor Hayes 9 reported responses 3.26Eval / 5
Overall3.26 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology4.10
Synthesis2.80
Collaboration3.00
Connection3.55
Contribution3.00
Discussion3.55
Inclusivity2.65
Grading3.30
Reflection3.25
Respect3.30
Creativity2.90
Feedback3.25
Interaction3.40
Challenge3.30
Questions3.85
Open full professor record
Anand Butler 77 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5

77 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.23
Technology4.56
Synthesis4.29
Collaboration3.88
Connection4.59
Contribution3.94
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.22
Grading4.59
Reflection4.63
Respect4.70
Creativity4.12
Feedback4.26
Interaction4.59
Challenge4.72
Questions4.67
Open full professor record
Jaekyeong Shin 3 reported responses 3.36Eval / 5
Overall3.36 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology3.00
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration3.00
Connection3.00
Contribution3.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.00
Reflection3.50
Respect3.50
Creativity4.50
Feedback2.25
Interaction3.50
Challenge4.50
Questions3.00
Open full professor record
Alpna Bhatia 392 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5

392 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.44
Technology4.69
Synthesis4.44
Collaboration3.92
Connection4.61
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.16
Grading4.60
Reflection4.53
Respect4.68
Creativity4.46
Feedback4.31
Interaction4.53
Challenge4.59
Questions4.65
Open full professor record
Natalie Huynh Anh Ho 19 reported responses 4.03Eval / 5
Overall4.03 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration3.00
Connection4.20
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.10
Reflection4.15
Respect4.75
Creativity3.70
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.05
Challenge4.05
Questions4.45
Open full professor record
Paro Paul Suh 50 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

50 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.17
Technology4.37
Synthesis4.13
Collaboration3.83
Connection4.53
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.33
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.53
Reflection4.20
Respect4.60
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.07
Interaction4.33
Challenge4.47
Questions4.57
Open full professor record
Grant G Webster 79 reported responses 4.18Eval / 5
Overall4.18 / 5

79 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.26
Technology4.50
Synthesis3.96
Collaboration4.22
Connection4.59
Contribution4.16
Discussion4.62
Inclusivity3.96
Grading4.26
Reflection4.23
Respect4.50
Creativity4.06
Feedback4.06
Interaction4.37
Challenge4.17
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Connor Weinstein 50 reported responses 3.97Eval / 5
Overall3.97 / 5

50 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.81
Technology4.28
Synthesis3.83
Collaboration3.08
Connection4.18
Contribution3.34
Discussion4.13
Inclusivity3.56
Grading4.02
Reflection4.09
Respect4.24
Creativity3.50
Feedback3.34
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.02
Questions4.68
Open full professor record
Youngeun Choi 39 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5

39 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.24
Technology4.41
Synthesis4.17
Collaboration3.84
Connection4.38
Contribution4.13
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.20
Reflection4.44
Respect4.68
Creativity4.16
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.52
Challenge4.19
Questions4.65
Open full professor record
Andrew Randel Fink 28 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5

28 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration3.87
Connection4.40
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.20
Reflection4.77
Respect4.77
Creativity4.37
Feedback4.43
Interaction4.47
Challenge4.47
Questions4.97
Open full professor record
Wenbo Meng 21 reported responses 3.84Eval / 5
Overall3.84 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.74
Technology4.22
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration3.06
Connection3.38
Contribution3.62
Discussion4.26
Inclusivity3.20
Grading4.08
Reflection3.78
Respect4.16
Creativity2.75
Feedback3.58
Interaction4.14
Challenge4.22
Questions3.96
Open full professor record
Xiang Chi 24 reported responses 3.44Eval / 5
Overall3.44 / 5

24 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.40
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.35
Collaboration2.70
Connection3.70
Contribution3.10
Discussion3.85
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.35
Reflection3.70
Respect4.30
Creativity3.10
Feedback2.95
Interaction3.55
Challenge3.55
Questions4.15
Open full professor record
Samuel Joseph Johnson 20 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.45
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.70
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.35
Challenge4.60
Questions4.40
Open full professor record
Austin Tyler Kennedy 108 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

108 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.27
Technology4.83
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.76
Connection4.53
Contribution3.97
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.58
Reflection4.44
Respect4.73
Creativity4.06
Feedback4.32
Interaction4.54
Challenge4.43
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Lauren Schechter 39 reported responses 4.05Eval / 5
Overall4.05 / 5

39 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.20
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.37
Connection4.23
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.53
Grading3.83
Reflection4.27
Respect4.70
Creativity3.63
Feedback3.87
Interaction4.13
Challenge4.30
Questions4.37
Open full professor record
Saigeetha Narasimhan 34 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5

34 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.48
Technology4.84
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration3.88
Connection4.47
Contribution4.28
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity4.29
Grading4.58
Reflection4.50
Respect4.67
Creativity3.86
Feedback4.53
Interaction4.29
Challenge4.48
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Brachel Robert Champion 15 reported responses 3.89Eval / 5
Overall3.89 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology4.20
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration3.20
Connection4.20
Contribution3.50
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.75
Grading3.70
Reflection3.50
Respect4.60
Creativity3.50
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.05
Challenge4.20
Questions4.00
Open full professor record
Sean Holland Strunk 124 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5

124 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.21
Technology4.51
Synthesis4.07
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.42
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.44
Inclusivity4.07
Grading4.51
Reflection4.35
Respect4.60
Creativity3.86
Feedback4.01
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.41
Questions4.55
Open full professor record
Joongsan Hwang 16 reported responses 3.66Eval / 5
Overall3.66 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology3.75
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration2.90
Connection3.80
Contribution3.45
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity3.70
Grading3.65
Reflection3.80
Respect4.20
Creativity3.25
Feedback3.20
Interaction4.30
Challenge3.65
Questions4.25
Open full professor record
Joel Belsterling 30 reported responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5

30 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.32
Technology4.47
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.06
Connection4.32
Contribution3.94
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity4.31
Grading4.39
Reflection4.14
Respect4.30
Creativity4.11
Feedback3.72
Interaction4.48
Challenge4.18
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Daniel Joseph Zuchegno 43 reported responses 4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5

43 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.54
Technology4.12
Synthesis4.03
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.91
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.61
Inclusivity4.33
Grading4.13
Reflection4.51
Respect4.67
Creativity3.58
Feedback3.59
Interaction4.35
Challenge3.99
Questions4.43
Open full professor record
Matthew R Hurt 14 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.60
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.60
Reflection4.50
Respect4.50
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.40
Questions4.40
Open full professor record
Mariya Burdina 206 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5

206 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.13
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.08
Collaboration3.45
Connection4.50
Contribution4.11
Discussion4.46
Inclusivity4.07
Grading4.49
Reflection4.35
Respect4.60
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.21
Interaction4.37
Challenge4.51
Questions4.61
Open full professor record
Chaz Michael Simmons 123 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

123 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.94
Technology4.18
Synthesis4.01
Collaboration3.56
Connection4.32
Contribution3.58
Discussion4.31
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.30
Reflection4.19
Respect4.32
Creativity3.86
Feedback4.09
Interaction4.18
Challenge4.21
Questions4.38
Open full professor record
Alec Truax 48 reported responses 4.18Eval / 5
Overall4.18 / 5

48 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.23
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.17
Collaboration4.23
Connection4.43
Contribution3.83
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.27
Reflection4.73
Respect4.80
Creativity4.32
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.56
Challenge4.43
Questions4.57
Open full professor record
Jisu Yu 42 reported responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5

42 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.32
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.09
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.19
Contribution4.16
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.39
Reflection4.39
Respect4.85
Creativity3.54
Feedback4.13
Interaction4.22
Challenge4.29
Questions4.81
Open full professor record
Jeong Won Ko 27 reported responses 3.94Eval / 5
Overall3.94 / 5

27 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.47
Synthesis3.77
Collaboration3.53
Connection4.10
Contribution3.97
Discussion4.17
Inclusivity3.77
Grading3.50
Reflection4.10
Respect4.43
Creativity3.53
Feedback3.83
Interaction4.17
Challenge4.13
Questions4.37
Open full professor record
Haeseong Park 53 reported responses 3.78Eval / 5
Overall3.78 / 5

53 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.17
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.39
Contribution4.11
Discussion4.42
Inclusivity3.79
Grading4.32
Reflection4.34
Respect4.42
Creativity4.38
Feedback3.84
Interaction4.33
Challenge4.33
Questions4.39
Open full professor record
Sheng Qu 103 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5

103 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.18
Connection4.51
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.71
Inclusivity4.22
Grading4.41
Reflection4.76
Respect4.77
Creativity3.98
Feedback4.49
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.67
Questions4.76
Open full professor record
Vijay Appasamy 17 reported responses 3.00Eval / 5
Overall3.00 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.77
Technology2.43
Synthesis2.63
Collaboration2.10
Connection3.17
Contribution3.73
Discussion3.43
Inclusivity2.73
Grading2.43
Reflection3.23
Respect4.53
Creativity2.07
Feedback2.27
Interaction3.43
Challenge3.13
Questions3.30
Open full professor record
Paige Elyse Schoonover 58 reported responses 4.15Eval / 5
Overall4.15 / 5

58 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.06
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration3.01
Connection4.82
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.33
Inclusivity4.46
Grading3.85
Reflection4.53
Respect4.70
Creativity3.96
Feedback4.04
Interaction4.07
Challenge4.00
Questions4.57
Open full professor record
Benjamin Wei Yao Zhang 23 reported responses 4.15Eval / 5
Overall4.15 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.45
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration3.55
Connection4.10
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.95
Reflection4.60
Respect4.70
Creativity3.70
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.10
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Michelle Ko 48 reported responses 3.98Eval / 5
Overall3.98 / 5

48 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.07
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.07
Collaboration3.59
Connection4.29
Contribution3.64
Discussion4.42
Inclusivity4.17
Grading4.23
Reflection4.39
Respect4.43
Creativity3.72
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.23
Challenge4.29
Questions4.58
Open full professor record
Boyang Yu 155 reported responses 4.00Eval / 5
Overall4.00 / 5

155 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.88
Technology4.27
Synthesis3.84
Collaboration3.52
Connection4.18
Contribution3.67
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity3.72
Grading4.42
Reflection4.30
Respect4.40
Creativity3.41
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.17
Questions4.38
Open full professor record
Yoontae Cho 129 reported responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5

129 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.09
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.09
Collaboration3.65
Connection4.36
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.41
Inclusivity3.96
Grading4.41
Reflection4.42
Respect4.67
Creativity4.16
Feedback4.14
Interaction4.16
Challenge4.23
Questions4.72
Open full professor record
Tyler Anderson 37 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5

37 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.23
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.17
Collaboration3.53
Connection4.43
Contribution3.93
Discussion4.43
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.20
Reflection4.43
Respect4.60
Creativity3.80
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.47
Challenge4.33
Questions4.50
Open full professor record
Rimjhim Saxena 143 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5

143 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.16
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.04
Collaboration3.86
Connection4.16
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.38
Inclusivity4.03
Grading4.21
Reflection4.36
Respect4.48
Creativity3.87
Feedback3.99
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.30
Questions4.57
Open full professor record
Arka Chakrabarti 41 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5

41 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.31
Synthesis4.02
Collaboration3.97
Connection4.69
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.67
Grading4.94
Reflection4.69
Respect4.96
Creativity3.05
Feedback4.01
Interaction4.03
Challenge4.68
Questions4.96
Open full professor record
Colin L Jareb 20 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.65
Connection4.45
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.55
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.35
Challenge4.50
Questions4.35
Open full professor record
Brian Flaxman 26 reported responses 4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5

26 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.35
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration3.45
Connection4.15
Contribution3.75
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.35
Reflection4.00
Respect4.25
Creativity3.95
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.25
Questions4.35
Open full professor record
Jerald Katz 60 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5

60 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.92
Technology3.85
Synthesis3.89
Collaboration3.14
Connection4.41
Contribution3.52
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity3.87
Grading3.90
Reflection4.32
Respect4.53
Creativity3.86
Feedback3.87
Interaction4.28
Challenge3.91
Questions4.17
Open full professor record
Peiyuan Li 16 reported responses 3.80Eval / 5
Overall3.80 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology3.50
Synthesis3.85
Collaboration3.40
Connection3.95
Contribution2.95
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.05
Reflection3.95
Respect4.35
Creativity2.95
Feedback3.70
Interaction3.80
Challenge3.90
Questions4.20
Open full professor record
Jack Novak 54 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5

54 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.21
Technology4.42
Synthesis3.99
Collaboration3.54
Connection4.42
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.36
Inclusivity3.91
Grading4.45
Reflection4.24
Respect4.65
Creativity3.88
Feedback3.98
Interaction4.43
Challenge4.28
Questions4.76
Open full professor record
Mengqi Zhang 34 reported responses 4.06Eval / 5
Overall4.06 / 5

34 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology3.80
Synthesis3.46
Collaboration3.58
Connection3.94
Contribution3.65
Discussion4.18
Inclusivity3.94
Grading4.28
Reflection3.95
Respect4.41
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.32
Challenge4.23
Questions4.43
Open full professor record
Sara Truesdale 173 reported responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5

173 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.09
Technology4.24
Synthesis3.95
Collaboration3.62
Connection4.19
Contribution3.81
Discussion4.26
Inclusivity3.69
Grading4.07
Reflection4.22
Respect4.40
Creativity3.78
Feedback3.68
Interaction4.28
Challenge4.28
Questions4.52
Open full professor record
Sungyoun Chung 109 reported responses 4.06Eval / 5
Overall4.06 / 5

109 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.14
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration3.54
Connection4.42
Contribution3.61
Discussion4.39
Inclusivity3.97
Grading4.49
Reflection4.38
Respect4.64
Creativity3.95
Feedback4.12
Interaction4.32
Challenge4.39
Questions4.65
Open full professor record
Fengyu Zhang 105 reported responses 3.68Eval / 5
Overall3.68 / 5

105 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.52
Technology3.92
Synthesis3.25
Collaboration2.81
Connection3.47
Contribution3.11
Discussion3.95
Inclusivity3.22
Grading3.63
Reflection3.79
Respect4.26
Creativity3.25
Feedback3.32
Interaction3.79
Challenge3.58
Questions4.07
Open full professor record
Peter Megenhardt 39 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5

39 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.47
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.63
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.53
Reflection4.63
Respect4.67
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.67
Questions4.77
Open full professor record
Kevin Wayne Starnes 8 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.50
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.20
Reflection4.60
Respect4.60
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Aditya Rachmanto 35 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5

35 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration4.14
Connection4.59
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.34
Inclusivity4.24
Grading4.24
Reflection4.60
Respect4.60
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.52
Interaction4.38
Challenge4.40
Questions4.76
Open full professor record
Bob Lin 86 reported responses 3.62Eval / 5
Overall3.62 / 5

86 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.44
Technology3.75
Synthesis3.26
Collaboration2.87
Connection3.82
Contribution2.83
Discussion3.55
Inclusivity3.36
Grading3.70
Reflection3.66
Respect3.89
Creativity3.17
Feedback3.16
Interaction3.56
Challenge3.41
Questions3.79
Open full professor record
Joey Kilpatrick 67 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5

67 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.26
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.19
Collaboration3.73
Connection4.24
Contribution3.83
Discussion4.37
Inclusivity3.73
Grading4.31
Reflection4.33
Respect4.63
Creativity4.16
Feedback4.07
Interaction4.31
Challenge4.46
Questions4.64
Open full professor record
Anja Felicitas Gruber 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Reflection5.00
Interaction5.00
Open full professor record
Warren Hendricks 46 reported responses 3.63Eval / 5
Overall3.63 / 5

46 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.91
Technology4.01
Synthesis3.81
Collaboration3.58
Connection4.16
Contribution3.54
Discussion3.73
Inclusivity3.86
Grading4.15
Reflection3.88
Respect4.32
Creativity3.52
Feedback3.31
Interaction4.13
Challenge3.73
Questions3.92
Open full professor record
Keanan Gleason 98 reported responses 4.08Eval / 5
Overall4.08 / 5

98 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.13
Technology4.49
Synthesis3.98
Collaboration3.74
Connection4.19
Contribution3.82
Discussion4.21
Inclusivity4.06
Grading4.08
Reflection4.36
Respect4.56
Creativity3.97
Feedback3.77
Interaction4.29
Challenge4.14
Questions4.56
Open full professor record
Leo Zhang 74 reported responses 3.83Eval / 5
Overall3.83 / 5

74 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.63
Technology3.95
Synthesis3.59
Collaboration3.13
Connection3.82
Contribution3.38
Discussion3.87
Inclusivity3.39
Grading3.56
Reflection3.90
Respect4.28
Creativity3.24
Feedback3.45
Interaction3.90
Challenge3.73
Questions4.11
Open full professor record
Danielle Parks 79 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5

79 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.24
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.17
Collaboration3.91
Connection4.63
Contribution4.42
Discussion4.76
Inclusivity4.13
Grading4.52
Reflection4.64
Respect4.79
Creativity4.07
Feedback4.26
Interaction4.59
Challenge4.54
Questions4.85
Open full professor record
Pooja Khosla 6 reported responses 3.82Eval / 5
Overall3.82 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology3.70
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration4.20
Connection3.70
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.40
Grading3.30
Reflection3.80
Respect4.20
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.80
Questions3.80
Open full professor record
Yuanyuan Wang 40 reported responses 3.72Eval / 5
Overall3.72 / 5

40 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.23
Collaboration3.33
Connection3.57
Contribution3.60
Discussion3.93
Inclusivity3.23
Grading3.93
Reflection3.87
Respect4.17
Creativity3.23
Feedback3.37
Interaction3.80
Challenge3.83
Questions3.97
Open full professor record
Pan Chen 59 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5

59 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology4.37
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.03
Connection4.37
Contribution4.03
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.07
Grading4.53
Reflection4.47
Respect4.73
Creativity4.13
Feedback4.13
Interaction4.53
Challenge4.33
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Bikalpa Baniya 42 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5

42 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration3.93
Connection4.40
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.53
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.30
Reflection4.63
Respect4.53
Creativity4.17
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.53
Challenge4.40
Questions4.63
Open full professor record
Qian Yong 45 reported responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5

45 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.23
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.97
Connection4.20
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.33
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.37
Reflection4.07
Respect4.30
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.03
Interaction4.37
Challenge4.00
Questions4.50
Open full professor record
Ryuta Akino 31 reported responses 4.04Eval / 5
Overall4.04 / 5

31 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.97
Technology4.57
Synthesis3.77
Collaboration3.97
Connection4.40
Contribution3.50
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.70
Grading3.93
Reflection4.13
Respect4.77
Creativity3.60
Feedback3.63
Interaction4.37
Challenge4.00
Questions4.47
Open full professor record
Nejat Yilmaz 22 reported responses 3.89Eval / 5
Overall3.89 / 5

22 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.77
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration2.63
Connection4.30
Contribution3.23
Discussion4.43
Inclusivity3.47
Grading3.87
Reflection4.50
Respect4.70
Creativity3.30
Feedback3.77
Interaction3.93
Challenge3.83
Questions4.33
Open full professor record
Chunyang Huang 23 reported responses 3.86Eval / 5
Overall3.86 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.93
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.03
Collaboration2.80
Connection4.13
Contribution3.07
Discussion4.07
Inclusivity3.67
Grading4.00
Reflection4.27
Respect4.30
Creativity3.87
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.13
Challenge3.70
Questions4.13
Open full professor record
Pedro Levy Sayon 56 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5

56 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.14
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration3.78
Connection4.45
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity3.95
Grading4.39
Reflection4.57
Respect4.55
Creativity4.03
Feedback4.37
Interaction4.43
Challenge4.40
Questions4.63
Open full professor record
Jongho Suh 49 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5

49 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.69
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration3.66
Connection4.18
Contribution3.83
Discussion4.54
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.45
Reflection4.42
Respect4.68
Creativity4.26
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.62
Challenge4.40
Questions4.66
Open full professor record
Liam Murphy 12 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.05
Connection4.35
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.85
Reflection4.65
Respect5.00
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.75
Questions4.95
Open full professor record
Haoze Li 13 reported responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.25
Contribution3.95
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.30
Reflection4.15
Respect4.25
Creativity4.05
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.10
Questions4.15
Open full professor record
Rohan Angadi 32 reported responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5

32 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.75
Connection4.25
Contribution3.95
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.75
Grading4.40
Reflection4.35
Respect4.35
Creativity3.70
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.20
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Daniel Fang 28 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5

28 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.17
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.30
Connection4.20
Contribution3.57
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.40
Reflection4.27
Respect4.63
Creativity3.83
Feedback4.20
Interaction3.97
Challenge4.37
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Yunxiao Wang 62 reported responses 4.07Eval / 5
Overall4.07 / 5

62 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.30
Synthesis3.73
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.07
Reflection4.23
Respect4.57
Creativity3.77
Feedback3.67
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.10
Questions4.50
Open full professor record
Eeli Jaakkola 19 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.83
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.57
Connection4.87
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.77
Reflection4.63
Respect4.70
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.73
Questions4.73
Open full professor record
John Gorman 26 reported responses 3.86Eval / 5
Overall3.86 / 5

26 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology4.13
Synthesis3.47
Collaboration3.43
Connection4.23
Contribution3.03
Discussion4.23
Inclusivity3.47
Grading3.90
Reflection4.17
Respect4.23
Creativity3.70
Feedback3.73
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.80
Questions4.27
Open full professor record
Yeowoon Jeon 19 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.97
Technology4.33
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration3.87
Connection4.20
Contribution3.93
Discussion4.43
Inclusivity3.53
Grading4.07
Reflection4.20
Respect4.47
Creativity4.13
Feedback3.87
Interaction4.27
Challenge4.23
Questions4.67
Open full professor record
Poorva Navalgundkar 13 reported responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.93
Technology4.23
Synthesis3.33
Collaboration4.13
Connection3.80
Contribution3.97
Discussion4.33
Inclusivity3.53
Grading3.93
Reflection4.27
Respect4.30
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.07
Interaction4.53
Challenge3.97
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Daniela Monge 53 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5

53 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.60
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.60
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.50
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Show fewer
Course documents

Syllabi 22

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

19 more syllabi

Spring 2026 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Spring 2026 · Section not specified

PROF. MURAT IYIGUN

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Spring 2026 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Spring 2024 · Section not specified

PROF. MURAT IYIGUN

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Spring 2024 · Section not specified

Elizabeth Sorensen Montoya

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Spring 2024 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.