Course record EBIO
EBIO 3410
Microbiology Lab
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable24 professors
Evaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score67/100
Strong
Joshua Berton Seabaugh 3 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Teresa Bilinski 3 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection5.00
Respect4.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.00
Questions4.00
Sierra Dawn Jech 28 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.88
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.73
Collaboration4.99
Connection4.87
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.09
Grading4.98
Reflection4.97
Respect5.00
Creativity4.78
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.94
Questions5.00
Alexandra Alexiev 22 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.92
Connection4.63
Contribution4.39
Discussion4.89
Inclusivity4.59
Grading4.74
Reflection4.43
Respect4.81
Creativity4.57
Feedback4.88
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.87
Questions4.89
Jessica Edith Rush 45 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
45 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.91
Synthesis4.34
Collaboration4.92
Connection4.73
Contribution4.52
Discussion4.94
Inclusivity3.83
Grading4.87
Reflection4.79
Respect4.92
Creativity4.72
Feedback4.81
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.95
Questions5.00
Javan Carter 7 reported responses 4.18Eval / 5
Overall4.18 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.70
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.75
Grading3.35
Reflection4.50
Respect4.50
Creativity4.85
Feedback2.85
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions3.35
Sukuan Liu 33 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.34
Technology4.44
Synthesis4.09
Collaboration4.91
Connection4.61
Contribution4.48
Discussion4.72
Inclusivity3.76
Grading4.22
Reflection4.75
Respect4.94
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.11
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.63
Questions4.60
Joseph Butterfield 14 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.70
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.75
Grading4.40
Reflection4.85
Respect4.65
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.75
Questions4.80
Darlynn Rachel Korns 14 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.70
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.75
Grading4.25
Reflection4.85
Respect4.75
Creativity4.50
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.75
Questions5.00
Vlonjat Lonnie Gashi 15 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.95
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.70
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.80
Reflection4.95
Respect5.00
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.65
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.85
Questions5.00
Sarah Gering 25 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.93
Technology4.97
Synthesis4.89
Collaboration4.98
Connection4.87
Contribution4.68
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity4.67
Grading4.90
Reflection4.97
Respect4.95
Creativity4.95
Feedback4.98
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.96
Questions4.98
Elias Stallard-Olivera 19 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.72
Technology4.89
Synthesis4.71
Collaboration4.99
Connection4.70
Contribution4.88
Discussion4.69
Inclusivity4.66
Grading4.98
Reflection4.65
Respect4.98
Creativity4.66
Feedback4.62
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.90
Questions4.98
Maya Shaulsky 74 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
74 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.36
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.34
Collaboration4.84
Connection4.42
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity4.24
Grading4.09
Reflection4.44
Respect4.73
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.18
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.60
Questions4.42
Kyle Samuel Schutz 4 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology4.20
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.80
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.00
Reflection4.00
Respect4.20
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.20
Questions5.00
John M Basey 25 reported responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.79
Technology4.79
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.77
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.83
Reflection4.83
Respect4.96
Creativity4.41
Feedback4.77
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.79
Questions5.00
Candice Perrotta 36 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.92
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.96
Connection4.82
Contribution4.78
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.48
Grading4.85
Reflection4.74
Respect4.88
Creativity4.71
Feedback4.78
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.81
Questions4.96
Mary Childress 18 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.90
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.75
Reflection4.75
Respect4.95
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.75
Questions4.95
Matthew James Gebert 5 reported responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.80
Contribution4.60
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.70
Grading5.00
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Joseph Peterman 14 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.75
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.70
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Labina Tasfia 15 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.65
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.35
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.65
Reflection4.70
Respect4.75
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.95
Rezan Algahtani 31 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.40
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.40
Reflection4.40
Respect4.85
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.30
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.55
Questions4.70
Asher Marvy 26 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.45
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.50
Reflection4.40
Respect4.95
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.55
Questions4.90
Rachel Billings 13 reported responses 4.05Eval / 5
Overall4.05 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.55
Connection3.90
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.75
Reflection3.95
Respect4.50
Creativity3.95
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.45
Challenge3.95
Questions3.80
Treson Thompson 3 reported responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.30
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.