Course record EBIO

EBIO 3240

Animal Behavior

University of Colorado Boulder

377 grades16 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score44/100
Mixed record

Professors 16 of 16

Ambika Kamath 189 grades · 1 term 3.44GPA
61.4% A
28.0% B
7.4% C
2.1% D
1.1% F

189 letter grades

Compare with the course
Kamath vs. the course average
A +9.9
B −4.6
C −2.7
D −1.6
F −1.1

Difference in percentage points.

3.6% withdrew · 7 of 196 enrolled.

Caitlin Anne Kelly 188 grades · 1 term 3.08GPA
41.5% A
37.2% B
12.8% C
5.3% D
3.2% F

188 letter grades

Compare with the course
Kelly vs. the course average
A −10.0
B +4.6
C +2.7
D +1.6
F +1.1

Difference in percentage points.

2.6% withdrew · 5 of 193 enrolled.

Aaron Westmoreland 55 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

55 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.61
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration4.86
Connection4.69
Contribution4.74
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.27
Grading4.76
Reflection4.74
Respect4.77
Creativity4.79
Feedback4.67
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.84
Questions4.95
Megan Zabinski 23 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.04
Technology4.58
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration4.74
Connection4.12
Contribution4.01
Discussion4.38
Inclusivity4.27
Grading4.10
Reflection4.23
Respect4.67
Creativity4.14
Feedback3.89
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.14
Questions4.55
Kathleen Sheahan 14 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.60
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.90
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.75
Questions4.95
Caitlin White 18 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.45
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.70
Reflection4.55
Respect4.85
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.85
Questions4.95
Kathryn Alethea Williams 13 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.80
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.85
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Katie Williams 16 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.90
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.95
Reflection5.00
Respect4.95
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.85
Questions5.00
Gladiana Spitz 75 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

75 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.59
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.51
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.41
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.21
Grading4.41
Reflection4.55
Respect4.76
Creativity4.56
Feedback4.51
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.58
Questions4.79
Alec John Chiono 6 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.50
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.75
Reflection4.75
Respect5.00
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions4.65
Heather V Kenny 19 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.10
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.40
Reflection4.55
Respect4.75
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.75
Questions4.70
Eve Bonser Cooper 168 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

168 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.18
Connection4.73
Contribution4.13
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.41
Grading4.61
Reflection4.65
Respect4.75
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.33
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.58
Questions4.75
Naiara Doherty Garcia 31 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

31 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.65
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.50
Reflection4.70
Respect4.85
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.65
Questions4.85
Rachel Billings 106 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

106 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.59
Technology4.56
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.41
Connection4.63
Contribution4.29
Discussion4.52
Inclusivity4.37
Grading4.39
Reflection4.59
Respect4.54
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.33
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.49
Questions4.54
Lincoln Taylor 27 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

27 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.55
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.40
Reflection4.55
Respect4.80
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.70
Questions4.75
Ren Or Brendon Davis 29 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5

29 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.50
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.45
Grading4.60
Reflection4.55
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.50
Questions4.90
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.