Course record EBIO
EBIO 2070
Genetics: Molecules to Populations
University of Colorado Boulder
1,088 grades24 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score23/100
Below average
Elizabeth L Paulson 119 grades · 1 term 3.18GPA
119 letter grades
Compare with the course
Paulson vs. the course average
A
+8.2
B
+1.2
C
−8.1
D
+0.1
F
−1.4
Difference in percentage points.
0.8% withdrew · 1 of 120 enrolled.
David W Stock 690 grades · 1 term 3.12GPA
690 letter grades
Compare with the course
Stock vs. the course average
A
+5.0
B
−2.1
C
−1.0
D
−2.1
F
+0.2
Difference in percentage points.
4.3% withdrew · 31 of 721 enrolled.
Overall3.85 / 5
391 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.96
Technology4.09
Synthesis3.57
Collaboration3.79
Connection4.11
Contribution3.57
Discussion4.16
Inclusivity3.65
Grading4.19
Reflection4.01
Respect4.64
Creativity3.79
Feedback2.92
Interaction4.29
Challenge4.02
Questions4.31
Daniel Meulemans Medeiros 279 grades · 1 term 2.71GPA
279 letter grades
Compare with the course
Medeiros vs. the course average
A
−15.8
B
+4.6
C
+5.9
D
+5.1
F
+0.2
Difference in percentage points.
3.1% withdrew · 9 of 288 enrolled.
Overall4.05 / 5
163 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.48
Collaboration3.78
Connection4.68
Contribution4.33
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.92
Grading4.48
Reflection4.59
Respect4.68
Creativity4.41
Feedback3.49
Interaction4.61
Challenge4.62
Questions4.57
Chelsea Pretz 14 reported responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.87
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.27
Inclusivity3.60
Grading3.83
Reflection4.37
Respect4.67
Creativity3.73
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.87
Challenge3.97
Questions4.50
Lindsey Ray 31 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.83
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.86
Connection4.32
Contribution4.49
Discussion4.84
Inclusivity4.26
Grading4.53
Reflection4.70
Respect4.92
Creativity4.46
Feedback4.76
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.74
Questions4.88
James Massey 41 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
41 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.58
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.76
Connection4.15
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity3.53
Grading4.58
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.49
Feedback4.64
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.66
Questions4.85
Sean Patrick Streich 25 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.36
Technology4.44
Synthesis4.26
Collaboration4.82
Connection3.86
Contribution4.76
Discussion4.28
Inclusivity3.66
Grading4.46
Reflection4.40
Respect4.82
Creativity4.12
Feedback4.36
Interaction4.62
Challenge4.42
Questions4.60
Robert Buchwald 80 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
80 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.86
Synthesis4.44
Collaboration4.46
Connection4.76
Contribution4.41
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.32
Grading4.76
Reflection4.71
Respect4.84
Creativity4.49
Feedback4.37
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.67
Questions4.88
Katherine Joyce Kariatsumari 9 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity3.95
Grading4.70
Reflection4.55
Respect4.35
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Vlonjat Lonnie Gashi 51 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5
51 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.11
Technology4.23
Synthesis3.97
Collaboration4.66
Connection4.00
Contribution4.46
Discussion4.33
Inclusivity3.98
Grading4.12
Reflection4.34
Respect4.48
Creativity3.97
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.69
Challenge4.17
Questions4.56
Skylar Montana Lynch 12 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.67
Contribution4.73
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.47
Grading4.70
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.57
Feedback4.83
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Peter Alexander Innes 41 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
41 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.76
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.02
Collaboration4.64
Connection4.31
Contribution4.78
Discussion4.99
Inclusivity4.67
Grading4.80
Reflection4.81
Respect4.98
Creativity4.61
Feedback4.81
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.55
Questions4.98
Will Cox 17 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.68
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.36
Collaboration4.63
Connection4.60
Contribution4.92
Discussion4.72
Inclusivity4.66
Grading4.22
Reflection4.84
Respect5.00
Creativity4.14
Feedback4.19
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.75
Questions4.98
Leo Orozco 100 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5
100 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.11
Technology3.52
Synthesis3.86
Collaboration4.57
Connection3.83
Contribution4.32
Discussion4.11
Inclusivity3.63
Grading3.60
Reflection4.32
Respect4.61
Creativity3.52
Feedback3.39
Interaction4.84
Challenge3.69
Questions4.03
Abbey Paulson 78 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
78 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.60
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.50
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Sara Padula 22 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.30
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.03
Grading4.40
Reflection4.80
Respect4.93
Creativity4.37
Feedback4.87
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.73
Questions4.83
Lincoln Taylor 19 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.65
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.75
Connection3.90
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.10
Grading4.25
Reflection4.50
Respect4.55
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.05
Questions4.70
Grace Bowman 20 reported responses 4.12Eval / 5
Overall4.12 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.93
Collaboration4.23
Connection3.87
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.27
Inclusivity3.97
Grading4.10
Reflection4.10
Respect4.27
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.03
Interaction4.13
Challenge4.23
Questions4.30
Katie Bardsley 21 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology4.87
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.97
Connection4.57
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.37
Grading4.77
Reflection4.93
Respect4.90
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.87
Questions4.93
Naiara Doherty Garcia 8 reported responses 3.77Eval / 5
Overall3.77 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.47
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.03
Contribution2.87
Discussion3.27
Inclusivity4.10
Grading3.47
Reflection3.20
Respect4.00
Creativity4.37
Feedback3.53
Interaction4.07
Challenge4.30
Questions4.10
Thiago Cardoso 12 reported responses 3.53Eval / 5
Overall3.53 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.17
Technology2.40
Synthesis3.40
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.67
Contribution4.50
Discussion3.73
Inclusivity3.10
Grading3.07
Reflection4.27
Respect4.30
Creativity3.80
Feedback2.13
Interaction4.13
Challenge3.47
Questions3.40
William Anderson 12 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.67
Technology3.80
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration4.87
Connection3.53
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.03
Inclusivity3.83
Grading4.13
Reflection4.33
Respect4.37
Creativity4.53
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.23
Questions4.53
Joey Lodge 21 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.47
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.87
Connection3.97
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity4.23
Grading4.20
Reflection4.57
Respect4.93
Creativity4.17
Feedback4.67
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.13
Questions4.70
Treson Thompson 12 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.53
Contribution4.57
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.60
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.43
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.43
Questions4.90
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.