Course record EBIO
EBIO 1240
General Biology Laboratory 2
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable99 professors
Evaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score43/100
Mixed record
Heather V Kenny 13 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology4.43
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.33
Contribution4.33
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.17
Reflection4.43
Respect4.93
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.67
Questions4.83
Erik R Funk 17 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.87
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.73
Collaboration4.53
Connection4.83
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity4.27
Grading4.77
Reflection4.73
Respect4.80
Creativity4.93
Feedback4.87
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.87
Questions4.93
Anna Wolf Paraskevopoulos 12 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration4.53
Connection4.60
Contribution4.33
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.07
Grading4.10
Reflection4.43
Respect4.77
Creativity4.17
Feedback3.93
Interaction4.53
Challenge4.50
Questions4.93
Katherine Joyce Kariatsumari 15 reported responses 3.74Eval / 5
Overall3.74 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.27
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.00
Contribution3.73
Discussion3.67
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.47
Reflection3.80
Respect4.10
Creativity3.77
Feedback3.20
Interaction4.17
Challenge3.80
Questions4.13
Jacob Heen Lowenstein 16 reported responses 3.90Eval / 5
Overall3.90 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.27
Technology3.40
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.77
Connection4.27
Contribution3.43
Discussion3.83
Inclusivity3.77
Grading3.63
Reflection4.43
Respect4.27
Creativity4.23
Feedback3.63
Interaction3.93
Challenge3.87
Questions3.53
Alyson Steel Ennis 17 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.87
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.57
Connection4.30
Contribution4.60
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.53
Grading4.43
Reflection4.37
Respect4.77
Creativity4.67
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.93
Skylar Montana Lynch 54 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
54 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.39
Technology4.76
Synthesis4.17
Collaboration4.89
Connection4.54
Contribution4.37
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity4.33
Grading4.79
Reflection4.77
Respect4.72
Creativity4.49
Feedback4.36
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.57
Questions4.82
Christa Lyn Torrens 50 reported responses 4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5
50 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.36
Technology4.26
Synthesis4.12
Collaboration4.55
Connection3.96
Contribution4.24
Discussion4.32
Inclusivity3.28
Grading3.12
Reflection4.14
Respect4.49
Creativity3.92
Feedback3.76
Interaction4.52
Challenge4.26
Questions4.03
Corinne M Innes 6 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.80
Synthesis3.10
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.20
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.30
Respect4.25
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.20
Questions4.90
Travis Mcdevitt-Galles 6 reported responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.90
Synthesis3.10
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.20
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.70
Reflection4.30
Respect4.35
Creativity3.65
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.10
Questions4.80
Luciana Escribens Carrillo 21 reported responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.13
Collaboration4.43
Connection3.93
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.07
Inclusivity4.17
Grading3.90
Reflection3.93
Respect4.33
Creativity3.87
Feedback3.93
Interaction4.43
Challenge4.10
Questions4.20
Alice Jeanne Del Simone 136 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
136 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology4.69
Synthesis4.09
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.15
Contribution4.26
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity3.59
Grading4.48
Reflection4.42
Respect4.82
Creativity4.48
Feedback4.58
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.73
Questions4.82
Patrick Morrison 8 reported responses 3.42Eval / 5
Overall3.42 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology4.05
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration3.30
Connection3.75
Contribution2.90
Discussion3.30
Inclusivity2.80
Grading3.05
Reflection3.80
Respect4.10
Creativity3.90
Feedback2.50
Interaction3.40
Challenge4.05
Questions2.75
Jesse Colt Harris 23 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.12
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.42
Connection4.12
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.58
Inclusivity3.58
Grading4.02
Reflection4.48
Respect4.68
Creativity4.47
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.53
Questions4.60
Aislyn Keyes 34 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.24
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.22
Collaboration4.45
Connection4.15
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity3.52
Grading4.31
Reflection4.35
Respect4.52
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.34
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.52
Questions4.48
Chelsea Pretz 30 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.37
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.58
Connection4.44
Contribution4.06
Discussion4.59
Inclusivity3.84
Grading4.25
Reflection4.18
Respect4.76
Creativity4.17
Feedback4.32
Interaction4.64
Challenge4.34
Questions4.61
Sallie Jane Tucker 10 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.83
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.73
Collaboration4.33
Connection5.00
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.57
Grading4.80
Reflection4.83
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.43
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions4.83
Elza Picasso-Hobin 18 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.37
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.73
Connection3.80
Contribution4.37
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.23
Grading4.20
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.17
Interaction4.57
Challenge4.77
Questions4.13
Joseph Butterfield 18 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.95
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.45
Connection4.40
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.50
Reflection4.85
Respect5.00
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Aaron Westmoreland 18 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.95
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.45
Connection4.40
Contribution4.75
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.70
Reflection4.85
Respect5.00
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.90
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Gabrielle Ann Orie 37 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.33
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.40
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.33
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.00
Reflection4.47
Respect4.53
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.17
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.17
Questions4.50
Leonardo Roman Orozco 17 reported responses 3.50Eval / 5
Overall3.50 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology3.58
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration4.40
Connection3.40
Contribution3.93
Discussion3.58
Inclusivity3.18
Grading2.88
Reflection4.02
Respect3.88
Creativity3.60
Feedback2.63
Interaction4.23
Challenge3.53
Questions3.38
Xun Yu 17 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.28
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.10
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity3.58
Grading4.13
Reflection4.35
Respect4.63
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.95
Interaction4.53
Challenge4.40
Questions4.70
John M Basey 140 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
140 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.41
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.26
Collaboration4.91
Connection4.45
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.82
Grading4.38
Reflection4.56
Respect4.69
Creativity4.49
Feedback4.48
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.52
Questions4.60
Luciana Escribens 24 reported responses 3.43Eval / 5
Overall3.43 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.97
Technology3.73
Synthesis3.83
Collaboration4.33
Connection3.43
Contribution3.53
Discussion3.37
Inclusivity3.53
Grading2.47
Reflection4.10
Respect3.97
Creativity3.50
Feedback2.43
Interaction4.47
Challenge3.57
Questions3.27
Chloe Frost Garfinkel 40 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.97
Connection4.63
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.27
Grading4.73
Reflection4.90
Respect4.87
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.83
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.87
Questions4.90
Scott Watson Nordstrom 31 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.43
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.13
Reflection4.63
Respect4.90
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.50
Questions4.77
Kaitlyn Marie Barthell 24 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.45
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.40
Reflection4.60
Respect4.60
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.40
Questions4.80
Austin Leonard Nash 19 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.23
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.27
Inclusivity4.07
Grading4.23
Reflection4.53
Respect4.60
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.07
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.60
Questions4.50
Katherine Hernandez 17 reported responses 3.65Eval / 5
Overall3.65 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.71
Technology3.84
Synthesis3.47
Collaboration4.25
Connection3.52
Contribution3.62
Discussion3.21
Inclusivity2.82
Grading3.84
Reflection3.63
Respect3.78
Creativity3.71
Feedback2.93
Interaction4.39
Challenge3.07
Questions3.40
Sara Garcia 43 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5
43 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.23
Technology4.17
Synthesis4.17
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.23
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.80
Grading3.83
Reflection4.37
Respect4.67
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.47
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.20
Questions4.17
Alec John Chiono 34 reported responses 4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.18
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.13
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.43
Inclusivity3.28
Grading4.00
Reflection4.27
Respect4.70
Creativity4.15
Feedback3.73
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.13
Questions4.70
Jared Michael Collins 33 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.03
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.10
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.97
Grading4.20
Reflection4.43
Respect4.75
Creativity4.43
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.63
Questions4.35
Asia Amira Kaiser 32 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.17
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.23
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.27
Reflection4.43
Respect4.83
Creativity4.37
Feedback4.23
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.57
Questions4.80
Andrew George Gaier 27 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.47
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.10
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.43
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.30
Reflection4.43
Respect4.87
Creativity4.37
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.50
Questions4.63
Courtney Lynn Van Den Elzen 29 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.10
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.47
Inclusivity4.03
Grading4.23
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.60
Questions4.73
Ryan Ernstes 29 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.03
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.93
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.17
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.17
Inclusivity3.37
Grading4.13
Reflection4.40
Respect4.40
Creativity4.17
Feedback3.83
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.30
Questions4.57
Grant Levi Vagle 66 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
66 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.42
Technology4.68
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.86
Connection4.41
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity3.68
Grading4.50
Reflection4.57
Respect4.73
Creativity4.61
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.76
Questions4.79
Irfan Alam 16 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.13
Technology4.66
Synthesis4.24
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.03
Contribution4.38
Discussion4.59
Inclusivity3.46
Grading4.38
Reflection4.34
Respect4.48
Creativity4.56
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.52
Challenge4.48
Questions4.52
Zachary Schwartz 28 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.67
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.27
Grading4.83
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.87
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.83
Questions4.93
Caroline Howell 30 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.43
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.70
Reflection4.57
Respect4.87
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.43
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.57
Questions4.87
Amir Ghayour 52 reported responses 3.97Eval / 5
Overall3.97 / 5
52 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.98
Technology4.15
Synthesis3.84
Collaboration4.55
Connection3.96
Contribution3.97
Discussion4.28
Inclusivity3.43
Grading3.54
Reflection4.07
Respect4.57
Creativity4.05
Feedback3.71
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.22
Questions4.33
Stephanie Talder 32 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.43
Reflection4.43
Respect4.77
Creativity4.37
Feedback4.37
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.50
Questions4.87
Catherine Ikudaisi 19 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.10
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.53
Inclusivity3.93
Grading3.70
Reflection4.40
Respect4.60
Creativity4.07
Feedback3.87
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.50
Questions4.27
Sahitya Kollipara 15 reported responses 3.71Eval / 5
Overall3.71 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.73
Technology3.77
Synthesis3.73
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.23
Contribution3.20
Discussion3.33
Inclusivity2.57
Grading3.57
Reflection3.70
Respect4.07
Creativity3.23
Feedback3.57
Interaction4.30
Challenge3.57
Questions3.37
Vatsal Verma 38 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5
38 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.27
Technology4.48
Synthesis4.28
Collaboration4.91
Connection4.17
Contribution4.36
Discussion4.69
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.04
Reflection4.26
Respect4.34
Creativity4.26
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.20
Questions4.55
Rohit Taware 37 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.63
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.70
Reflection4.73
Respect4.77
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.67
Questions4.73
Julia Dean 40 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.83
Technology4.93
Synthesis4.77
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.77
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.67
Grading4.87
Reflection4.90
Respect4.93
Creativity4.83
Feedback4.83
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.83
Questions4.97
Megan Zabinski 5 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.60
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.40
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.60
Questions5.00
Lorena Cannon 34 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.48
Contribution4.48
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.85
Reflection4.55
Respect4.88
Creativity4.82
Feedback4.97
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.88
Questions4.97
Ruth Quispe Pilco 29 reported responses 3.78Eval / 5
Overall3.78 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.78
Technology3.57
Synthesis3.78
Collaboration4.52
Connection3.74
Contribution3.94
Discussion3.47
Inclusivity3.05
Grading2.70
Reflection3.62
Respect4.46
Creativity3.46
Feedback2.88
Interaction4.30
Challenge3.77
Questions3.54
Adam Solon 32 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.53
Contribution4.37
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity4.03
Grading4.40
Reflection4.73
Respect4.80
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.60
Questions4.87
Jingwei Li 15 reported responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.03
Synthesis4.07
Collaboration4.90
Connection3.73
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.63
Grading3.47
Reflection4.30
Respect4.23
Creativity4.03
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.17
Questions4.33
Caitlin Anne Kelly 4 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Braden Johnson 60 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
60 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.43
Contribution4.44
Discussion4.62
Inclusivity3.91
Grading4.57
Reflection4.43
Respect4.69
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.81
Challenge4.62
Questions4.72
S Francis Naylor 21 reported responses 3.53Eval / 5
Overall3.53 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology3.68
Synthesis3.73
Collaboration4.65
Connection3.55
Contribution3.90
Discussion3.05
Inclusivity3.33
Grading3.23
Reflection3.85
Respect3.90
Creativity3.45
Feedback2.72
Interaction4.33
Challenge3.30
Questions3.10
Arnib Alam Farooqui 27 reported responses 3.27Eval / 5
Overall3.27 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.73
Technology3.43
Synthesis3.10
Collaboration4.55
Connection3.37
Contribution3.60
Discussion2.83
Inclusivity2.23
Grading2.60
Reflection3.35
Respect3.65
Creativity3.53
Feedback2.50
Interaction4.38
Challenge3.05
Questions3.08
Camryn Miller 88 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
88 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.92
Connection4.54
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity3.69
Grading4.42
Reflection4.52
Respect4.79
Creativity4.58
Feedback4.56
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.69
Questions4.88
Rithik Kumar Athiganur Senthil 21 reported responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.13
Technology3.60
Synthesis3.93
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.33
Contribution4.13
Discussion4.23
Inclusivity3.80
Grading3.70
Reflection4.20
Respect4.43
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.63
Interaction4.57
Challenge4.00
Questions4.20
James Perkins 35 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5
35 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.23
Technology4.37
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.13
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.47
Inclusivity3.47
Grading4.03
Reflection4.47
Respect4.67
Creativity4.17
Feedback4.17
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.30
Questions4.17
Manuela Mejia 41 reported responses 3.61Eval / 5
Overall3.61 / 5
41 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.93
Technology3.63
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration4.57
Connection3.47
Contribution3.73
Discussion3.63
Inclusivity2.93
Grading2.87
Reflection3.73
Respect3.77
Creativity3.70
Feedback3.30
Interaction4.20
Challenge3.67
Questions3.57
William Anderson 46 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
46 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.70
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.43
Grading4.67
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.53
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.80
Questions4.87
Kathryn Naherny 71 reported responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5
71 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.48
Connection4.08
Contribution3.88
Discussion3.79
Inclusivity3.25
Grading3.48
Reflection3.95
Respect4.25
Creativity3.98
Feedback3.57
Interaction4.53
Challenge4.01
Questions4.12
Lincoln Taylor 33 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.33
Synthesis4.17
Collaboration4.73
Connection4.37
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.23
Inclusivity3.57
Grading3.63
Reflection4.43
Respect4.67
Creativity4.33
Feedback3.83
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.43
Questions4.53
Stuti Pandey 37 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.07
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.10
Contribution4.33
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.07
Grading4.57
Reflection4.43
Respect4.83
Creativity4.03
Feedback4.37
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.47
Questions4.87
Andrew Veselka 33 reported responses 3.97Eval / 5
Overall3.97 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.88
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.85
Collaboration4.60
Connection3.97
Contribution3.85
Discussion3.78
Inclusivity3.25
Grading3.63
Reflection3.90
Respect4.40
Creativity3.65
Feedback3.63
Interaction4.53
Challenge4.02
Questions4.08
Briana Prado 33 reported responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.57
Synthesis3.93
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.27
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.13
Inclusivity3.57
Grading3.77
Reflection3.93
Respect4.27
Creativity3.87
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.03
Questions4.37
Emma Britt 65 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
65 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration4.94
Connection4.57
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.05
Grading4.64
Reflection4.70
Respect4.87
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.56
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.75
Questions4.94
Mauryadeepsinh Gohil 77 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5
77 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.23
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.17
Collaboration4.68
Connection4.26
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.44
Inclusivity3.92
Grading4.27
Reflection4.28
Respect4.52
Creativity4.32
Feedback4.14
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.32
Questions4.52
Airy Gonzalez Peralta 45 reported responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5
45 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.37
Synthesis4.17
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.33
Contribution4.37
Discussion4.27
Inclusivity3.43
Grading3.77
Reflection4.33
Respect4.50
Creativity4.03
Feedback3.67
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.20
Questions4.50
Saket Bhosle 44 reported responses 3.37Eval / 5
Overall3.37 / 5
44 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.63
Technology3.53
Synthesis3.53
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.57
Contribution3.87
Discussion3.57
Inclusivity3.20
Grading2.53
Reflection3.53
Respect3.57
Creativity3.60
Feedback2.50
Interaction4.10
Challenge3.60
Questions3.23
Shipra Singh 32 reported responses 3.69Eval / 5
Overall3.69 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology3.83
Synthesis3.77
Collaboration4.20
Connection3.53
Contribution3.70
Discussion3.50
Inclusivity3.43
Grading3.33
Reflection4.17
Respect4.10
Creativity3.13
Feedback3.30
Interaction4.27
Challenge3.70
Questions3.60
Onkar Apte 69 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5
69 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.36
Technology4.43
Synthesis4.22
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.13
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.54
Grading4.05
Reflection4.38
Respect4.61
Creativity4.04
Feedback3.91
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.45
Questions4.32
Ren Or Brendon Davis 55 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
55 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.71
Technology4.76
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.88
Connection4.56
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.44
Grading4.58
Reflection4.58
Respect4.93
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.42
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.69
Questions4.81
Carmen Black 34 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.60
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity3.97
Grading4.63
Reflection4.63
Respect4.90
Creativity4.57
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.83
Questions4.90
Anshul Jain 39 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.30
Contribution4.17
Discussion4.47
Inclusivity3.57
Grading4.27
Reflection4.37
Respect4.70
Creativity4.37
Feedback3.83
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
Christi Suresh Fernandes 46 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
46 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.97
Connection4.43
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.63
Grading4.27
Reflection4.57
Respect4.73
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.63
Questions4.80
Deeptanshu Sankhwar 36 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration4.67
Connection4.53
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.60
Reflection4.60
Respect4.83
Creativity4.67
Feedback4.53
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.67
Questions4.83
Hunter Geist-Sanchez 67 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
67 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.98
Connection4.72
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.31
Grading4.67
Reflection4.66
Respect4.94
Creativity4.76
Feedback4.59
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.77
Questions4.88
Seth Raynor 37 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.53
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity3.93
Grading4.45
Reflection4.55
Respect4.68
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.63
Questions4.68
Varun Naraganahalli Raghavendra 38 reported responses 4.12Eval / 5
Overall4.12 / 5
38 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.29
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.04
Collaboration4.74
Connection4.18
Contribution4.33
Discussion4.44
Inclusivity3.76
Grading3.44
Reflection4.04
Respect4.54
Creativity3.95
Feedback3.93
Interaction4.62
Challenge4.28
Questions4.15
Treson Thompson 33 reported responses 3.69Eval / 5
Overall3.69 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.67
Technology3.90
Synthesis3.47
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.73
Contribution3.77
Discussion3.63
Inclusivity2.73
Grading2.97
Reflection3.80
Respect4.17
Creativity3.50
Feedback3.20
Interaction4.47
Challenge3.80
Questions3.47
Rishabh Kumar 25 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.30
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity3.65
Grading4.40
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.45
Questions4.75
Rajath Vasisth 15 reported responses 3.73Eval / 5
Overall3.73 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology3.77
Synthesis3.73
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.00
Contribution3.70
Discussion3.77
Inclusivity3.30
Grading3.20
Reflection3.70
Respect4.47
Creativity3.67
Feedback3.03
Interaction4.47
Challenge3.60
Questions3.77
Paige Mccreadie 19 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.33
Contribution4.33
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity3.57
Grading4.73
Reflection4.33
Respect4.77
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.57
Questions4.90
Ridley Warner 18 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.27
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity4.17
Grading4.10
Reflection4.60
Respect4.93
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.17
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.73
Questions4.80
Sebrina Brooks 33 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.23
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.53
Inclusivity3.57
Grading3.67
Reflection4.27
Respect4.73
Creativity4.07
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.57
Questions4.50
Adeline Goujon 21 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.87
Connection3.97
Contribution4.33
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity3.33
Grading4.37
Reflection4.27
Respect4.67
Creativity4.37
Feedback4.33
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.67
Questions4.77
Haley Phillips 16 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology3.93
Synthesis3.77
Collaboration4.90
Connection3.73
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.17
Inclusivity2.63
Grading4.23
Reflection4.30
Respect4.20
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.23
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.33
Questions4.73
Skylar Graves 13 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.83
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.90
Contribution4.53
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.47
Grading4.80
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.63
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.73
Questions4.90
Cooper Le-Doux 25 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.23
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.87
Connection3.90
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.17
Inclusivity3.67
Grading3.90
Reflection4.17
Respect4.70
Creativity4.63
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.33
Questions4.83
Talli Fox 44 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
44 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.53
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.13
Grading4.53
Reflection4.73
Respect4.93
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.73
Questions4.80
Samantha Rothberg 27 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.50
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.37
Grading4.47
Reflection4.67
Respect4.80
Creativity4.53
Feedback4.43
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.77
Questions4.80
Meriem Krarti 54 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
54 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.56
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.46
Collaboration4.88
Connection4.50
Contribution4.56
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.18
Grading4.36
Reflection4.72
Respect4.84
Creativity4.64
Feedback4.54
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.74
Questions4.68
Archit Shukla 23 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.73
Connection4.67
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.27
Grading4.57
Reflection4.57
Respect4.63
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.53
Questions4.80
Nadia Alhassani 34 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.50
Contribution4.37
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.97
Grading4.73
Reflection4.43
Respect4.73
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.63
Questions4.83
Nova Robbins-Waldstein 14 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.07
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.07
Collaboration4.73
Connection4.43
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity4.33
Grading3.80
Reflection4.33
Respect4.87
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.63
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.00
Questions4.37
Ella Dietz 34 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.23
Contribution4.33
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.67
Reflection4.50
Respect4.83
Creativity4.67
Feedback4.67
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.77
Questions4.87
Emi Bauer 26 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.13
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.23
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.53
Grading4.53
Reflection4.57
Respect4.73
Creativity4.33
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.63
Questions4.73
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.