Course record EBIO
EBIO 1210
General Biology 1
University of Colorado Boulder
6,409 grades20 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score19/100
Needs work
Warren Sconiers 1,497 grades · 1 term 3.44GPA
1,497 letter grades
Compare with the course
Sconiers vs. the course average
A
+25.9
B
−13.4
C
−12.0
D
−1.3
F
+0.7
Difference in percentage points.
2.4% withdrew · 37 of 1,534 enrolled.
Overall4.29 / 5
1,474 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.26
Technology4.74
Synthesis4.26
Collaboration4.16
Connection4.43
Contribution4.14
Discussion4.69
Inclusivity4.12
Grading4.51
Reflection4.62
Respect4.73
Creativity4.25
Feedback3.84
Interaction4.58
Challenge4.62
Questions4.65
Barbara Demmig-Adams 42 grades · 1 term 3.35GPA
42 letter grades
Compare with the course
Demmig-Adams vs. the course average
A
+17.5
B
−3.2
C
−12.9
D
−3.5
F
+2.0
Difference in percentage points.
6.7% withdrew · 3 of 45 enrolled.
Overall3.73 / 5
542 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration3.68
Connection4.28
Contribution3.85
Discussion4.08
Inclusivity3.74
Grading4.17
Reflection4.36
Respect4.39
Creativity4.25
Feedback3.87
Interaction4.17
Challenge4.44
Questions4.18
William Adams 48 grades · 1 term 3.34GPA
48 letter grades
Compare with the course
Adams vs. the course average
A
+16.3
B
−11.2
C
−3.0
D
+0.7
F
−2.7
Difference in percentage points.
2.0% withdrew · 1 of 49 enrolled.
Overall3.58 / 5
532 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.78
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.79
Collaboration2.36
Connection4.18
Contribution3.25
Discussion3.75
Inclusivity3.86
Grading3.99
Reflection4.08
Respect4.33
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.44
Interaction3.66
Challenge4.34
Questions4.41
Elizabeth L Paulson 135 grades · 1 term 3.20GPA
135 letter grades
Compare with the course
Paulson vs. the course average
A
+4.6
B
+3.6
C
−8.7
D
+0.2
F
+0.2
Difference in percentage points.
4.3% withdrew · 6 of 141 enrolled.
Jessica A Gorski 175 grades · 1 term 3.13GPA
175 letter grades
Compare with the course
Gorski vs. the course average
A
+1.4
B
+5.3
C
−5.6
D
−0.1
F
−1.0
Difference in percentage points.
2.8% withdrew · 5 of 180 enrolled.
Overall4.40 / 5
126 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.44
Synthesis4.27
Collaboration4.62
Connection4.03
Contribution3.87
Discussion4.39
Inclusivity3.55
Grading4.36
Reflection4.50
Respect4.45
Creativity4.28
Feedback4.31
Interaction4.69
Challenge4.53
Questions4.55
Samuel M Flaxman 646 grades · 1 term 2.99GPA
646 letter grades
Compare with the course
Flaxman vs. the course average
A
−5.2
B
+2.2
C
+3.7
D
−1.5
F
+0.7
Difference in percentage points.
5.3% withdrew · 36 of 682 enrolled.
Overall3.62 / 5
300 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.65
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.65
Collaboration2.90
Connection3.70
Contribution2.90
Discussion3.30
Inclusivity3.40
Grading3.80
Reflection4.00
Respect4.30
Creativity3.70
Feedback3.05
Interaction3.50
Challenge4.05
Questions3.65
Teresa Bilinski 178 grades · 1 term 2.97GPA
178 letter grades
Compare with the course
Bilinski vs. the course average
A
−1.0
B
+1.3
C
−4.1
D
−0.7
F
+4.6
Difference in percentage points.
5.8% withdrew · 11 of 189 enrolled.
Overall4.31 / 5
58 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.30
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.20
Reflection4.45
Respect4.45
Creativity4.55
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.40
Questions4.40
Derek Michael Sweeney 3,435 grades · 1 term 2.97GPA
3,435 letter grades
Compare with the course
Sweeney vs. the course average
A
−9.2
B
+5.7
C
+4.5
D
same
F
−0.9
Difference in percentage points.
3.7% withdrew · 131 of 3,566 enrolled.
Overall3.44 / 5
1,800 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.65
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration2.70
Connection4.10
Contribution3.21
Discussion3.47
Inclusivity3.61
Grading4.00
Reflection3.83
Respect4.24
Creativity3.40
Feedback2.97
Interaction4.20
Challenge3.66
Questions4.27
Paige Willever Shilling Littman 62 grades · 1 term 2.80GPA
62 letter grades
Compare with the course
Littman vs. the course average
A
−6.6
B
−5.1
C
+4.9
D
+6.2
F
+0.5
Difference in percentage points.
12.7% withdrew · 9 of 71 enrolled.
Overall4.70 / 5
53 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.66
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.28
Contribution4.68
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity4.06
Grading4.75
Reflection4.65
Respect4.79
Creativity4.34
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.98
Questions4.93
Diana Oliveras 191 grades · 1 term 2.14GPA
191 letter grades
Compare with the course
Oliveras vs. the course average
A
−28.9
B
−8.0
C
+18.0
D
+13.8
F
+5.1
Difference in percentage points.
7.3% withdrew · 15 of 206 enrolled.
Overall4.39 / 5
180 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.18
Technology4.28
Synthesis4.02
Collaboration3.75
Connection3.97
Contribution4.28
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity3.26
Grading4.32
Reflection4.31
Respect4.48
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.11
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.52
Questions4.62
Kyle Samuel Schutz 560 reported responses 3.57Eval / 5
Overall3.57 / 5
560 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.58
Technology3.98
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration2.93
Connection3.73
Contribution2.87
Discussion3.30
Inclusivity3.35
Grading3.75
Reflection4.00
Respect4.13
Creativity3.60
Feedback3.08
Interaction3.50
Challenge3.90
Questions3.60
Kristin Hayley White 533 reported responses 3.60Eval / 5
Overall3.60 / 5
533 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology3.95
Synthesis3.63
Collaboration2.92
Connection3.72
Contribution2.93
Discussion3.38
Inclusivity3.35
Grading3.73
Reflection4.00
Respect4.13
Creativity3.60
Feedback3.28
Interaction3.53
Challenge3.85
Questions3.63
Robert Buchwald 272 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
272 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.34
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.31
Collaboration4.44
Connection4.72
Contribution4.27
Discussion4.71
Inclusivity4.27
Grading4.59
Reflection4.74
Respect4.90
Creativity4.56
Feedback4.28
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.81
Questions4.85
Lynn Wolfe 59 reported responses 3.58Eval / 5
Overall3.58 / 5
59 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.49
Technology4.12
Synthesis3.18
Collaboration3.10
Connection3.60
Contribution3.31
Discussion4.03
Inclusivity2.86
Grading3.99
Reflection3.94
Respect4.11
Creativity2.80
Feedback3.84
Interaction4.41
Challenge3.96
Questions4.06
Caitlin Anne Kelly 234 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
234 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.72
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.36
Grading4.83
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.31
Feedback4.66
Interaction4.81
Challenge4.78
Questions4.90
Tracy Halward 14 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.80
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.70
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Abbey Paulson 107 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
107 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.27
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.26
Collaboration4.64
Connection4.24
Contribution4.22
Discussion4.71
Inclusivity3.92
Grading4.50
Reflection4.56
Respect4.66
Creativity4.28
Feedback4.08
Interaction4.76
Challenge4.57
Questions4.82
Kim Vincent 38 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
38 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.54
Technology4.05
Synthesis4.66
Collaboration4.45
Connection4.65
Contribution4.83
Discussion4.89
Inclusivity4.79
Grading4.42
Reflection4.88
Respect4.90
Creativity3.96
Feedback3.47
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.54
Questions4.17
Eve Bonser Cooper 96 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
96 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.87
Synthesis4.42
Collaboration3.82
Connection4.59
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.36
Inclusivity3.85
Grading4.53
Reflection4.63
Respect4.58
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.09
Interaction4.37
Challenge4.72
Questions4.57
Stephanie Kathryn Polutchko 151 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
151 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration4.43
Connection4.73
Contribution4.33
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity4.03
Grading4.50
Reflection4.63
Respect4.83
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.57
Challenge4.63
Questions4.73
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.