Course record EBIO
EBIO 1110
Biology and Society Laboratory
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable21 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score43/100
Mixed record
Elza Picasso-Hobin 11 reported responses 2.97Eval / 5
Overall2.97 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology2.77
Synthesis2.60
Collaboration2.27
Connection2.80
Contribution2.73
Discussion2.27
Inclusivity3.20
Grading2.37
Reflection2.63
Respect4.27
Creativity2.77
Feedback2.80
Interaction3.63
Challenge3.23
Questions2.63
Jacob Heen Lowenstein 8 reported responses 2.71Eval / 5
Overall2.71 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology3.43
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration1.20
Connection2.97
Contribution2.30
Discussion2.57
Inclusivity2.67
Grading2.07
Reflection2.47
Respect4.00
Creativity2.60
Feedback3.20
Interaction2.50
Challenge2.60
Questions3.63
Katherine Hernandez 22 reported responses 3.47Eval / 5
Overall3.47 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.54
Technology3.46
Synthesis3.44
Collaboration2.51
Connection3.74
Contribution3.27
Discussion3.54
Inclusivity3.31
Grading3.14
Reflection3.58
Respect4.55
Creativity3.37
Feedback3.08
Interaction3.58
Challenge3.70
Questions4.38
Chloe Frost Garfinkel 27 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.87
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.72
Collaboration4.91
Connection4.59
Contribution4.84
Discussion4.99
Inclusivity4.37
Grading4.98
Reflection4.80
Respect4.98
Creativity4.84
Feedback4.94
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.94
Questions4.98
Aaron Westmoreland 15 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.87
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration4.23
Connection4.40
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.03
Grading4.23
Reflection4.13
Respect4.87
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.37
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.70
Questions4.77
John M Basey 10 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.26
Technology4.34
Synthesis3.66
Collaboration4.37
Connection4.18
Contribution4.87
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity3.23
Grading4.34
Reflection4.78
Respect4.95
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.68
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.34
Questions4.52
Chelsea Pretz 5 reported responses 3.74Eval / 5
Overall3.74 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.20
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration4.20
Connection3.00
Contribution3.60
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.40
Reflection3.20
Respect4.60
Creativity3.40
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge3.60
Questions4.60
Melinda Marie Stueber 19 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.72
Collaboration4.92
Connection4.61
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.41
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.49
Reflection4.64
Respect4.79
Creativity4.36
Feedback4.36
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.51
Questions4.61
Zachary Daniel Root 12 reported responses 3.65Eval / 5
Overall3.65 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.87
Technology3.63
Synthesis3.77
Collaboration4.67
Connection3.90
Contribution3.73
Discussion3.70
Inclusivity3.20
Grading3.13
Reflection3.87
Respect4.50
Creativity3.27
Feedback2.73
Interaction4.60
Challenge3.43
Questions3.73
Blessing Ife Sokoya 19 reported responses 3.53Eval / 5
Overall3.53 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.63
Technology3.23
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration4.27
Connection3.81
Contribution3.01
Discussion3.46
Inclusivity3.39
Grading2.86
Reflection2.94
Respect4.34
Creativity3.12
Feedback2.86
Interaction4.27
Challenge3.18
Questions3.27
Sukuan Liu 34 reported responses 3.71Eval / 5
Overall3.71 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.56
Technology4.75
Synthesis3.31
Collaboration4.71
Connection3.61
Contribution3.74
Discussion3.54
Inclusivity2.94
Grading3.58
Reflection3.80
Respect4.85
Creativity3.86
Feedback2.51
Interaction4.94
Challenge3.79
Questions4.24
Sierra Dawn Jech 40 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.23
Technology4.64
Synthesis3.91
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.55
Contribution4.44
Discussion4.53
Inclusivity3.53
Grading4.92
Reflection4.51
Respect4.91
Creativity4.33
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.84
Questions5.00
Khaled Metwally 24 reported responses 3.55Eval / 5
Overall3.55 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.81
Technology4.08
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration4.56
Connection4.15
Contribution3.55
Discussion3.71
Inclusivity3.22
Grading3.33
Reflection3.74
Respect4.20
Creativity3.88
Feedback3.06
Interaction4.33
Challenge3.84
Questions3.71
Jessica Edith Rush 39 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.84
Connection4.59
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity3.67
Grading4.86
Reflection4.66
Respect4.73
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.66
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.86
Questions4.93
Mailor Amaral 108 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
108 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology4.59
Synthesis4.16
Collaboration4.79
Connection4.60
Contribution4.31
Discussion4.62
Inclusivity3.83
Grading4.66
Reflection4.39
Respect4.74
Creativity4.46
Feedback4.53
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.59
Questions4.84
Catherine Ikudaisi 33 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.01
Technology4.66
Synthesis3.86
Collaboration4.58
Connection4.21
Contribution3.85
Discussion4.29
Inclusivity3.63
Grading4.17
Reflection4.06
Respect4.20
Creativity4.19
Feedback4.01
Interaction4.43
Challenge4.24
Questions4.67
Abby Ross 6 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.07
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity4.33
Grading4.57
Reflection3.93
Respect4.17
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.43
Interaction4.57
Challenge4.43
Questions4.67
Charlotte Sue 47 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
47 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.23
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.63
Grading4.43
Reflection4.52
Respect4.87
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.62
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.65
Questions4.92
Anshul Jain 14 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.60
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.47
Inclusivity3.67
Grading4.40
Reflection4.67
Respect4.67
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.33
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.77
Questions4.67
Kathryn Naherny 20 reported responses 4.08Eval / 5
Overall4.08 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.07
Technology4.23
Synthesis4.07
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.37
Contribution4.00
Discussion3.67
Inclusivity2.83
Grading3.77
Reflection4.13
Respect4.43
Creativity4.13
Feedback3.43
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.10
Questions4.23
Jacob Fenner 9 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.83
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.33
Contribution4.33
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.50
Reflection4.77
Respect4.83
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.53
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.83
Questions4.67
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.