Course record CSCI

CSCI 4830

Special Topics in Computer Science

University of Colorado Boulder

93 grades37 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score65/100
Strong

Professors 37 of 37

Henry Tufo 12 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 4.00GPA
100.0% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

12 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 12 enrolled.

Daniel Benjamin Larremore 23 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.67GPA
78.3% A
17.4% B
4.3% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

23 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 23 enrolled.

Alessandro Roncone 15 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.67GPA
80.0% A
13.3% B
6.7% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

15 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 15 enrolled.

Emilie Young 21 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.56GPA
85.7% A
4.8% B
0.0% C
4.8% D
4.8% F

21 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 21 enrolled.

Walter Nolen Scaife 12 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.50GPA
83.3% A
0.0% B
8.3% C
0.0% D
8.3% F

12 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 12 enrolled.

Ryan Matthew Layer 10 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.10GPA
60.0% A
10.0% B
20.0% C
0.0% D
10.0% F

10 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 10 enrolled.

Daniel Leithinger 1 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Nolen Scaife 14 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.54
Technology4.69
Synthesis4.34
Collaboration4.34
Connection4.85
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity3.47
Grading3.94
Reflection4.75
Respect4.68
Creativity4.49
Feedback4.47
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.78
Questions4.66
Howard Kramer 23 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.48
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration4.61
Connection4.55
Contribution4.44
Discussion4.29
Inclusivity4.61
Grading4.30
Reflection4.22
Respect4.54
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.29
Interaction4.58
Challenge4.38
Questions4.43
Eric A Wustrow 62 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5

62 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.68
Technology4.76
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.79
Contribution4.68
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity4.61
Grading4.61
Reflection4.70
Respect4.77
Creativity4.76
Feedback4.44
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.72
Questions4.63
Robin Douglas Burke 5 reported responses 4.96Eval / 5
Overall4.96 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.80
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Benjamin F Waggoner 5 reported responses 4.96Eval / 5
Overall4.96 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.80
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Mark D Gross 13 reported responses 4.15Eval / 5
Overall4.15 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.98
Technology4.27
Synthesis4.96
Collaboration4.98
Connection4.99
Contribution4.99
Discussion4.99
Inclusivity4.98
Grading3.28
Reflection4.96
Respect4.97
Creativity4.71
Feedback3.68
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.99
Questions4.02
Sriram Sankaranarayanan 4 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration4.23
Connection4.46
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.77
Reflection4.46
Respect5.00
Creativity4.46
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.77
Questions4.77
Nikolaus Correll 2 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Stephen R Becker 2 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Rafael M Frongillo 3 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.92
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.92
Collaboration4.92
Connection4.92
Contribution4.92
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Amy Catherine Banic 1 reported responses 4.05Eval / 5
Overall4.05 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration1.00
Connection5.00
Contribution3.00
Discussion5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection5.00
Respect4.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.00
Michael Rivera 20 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.68
Technology4.98
Synthesis4.92
Collaboration4.24
Connection4.67
Contribution4.88
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity3.93
Grading4.98
Reflection4.50
Respect4.98
Creativity4.92
Feedback4.81
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.92
Questions4.68
Daria Kotys 1 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Julie Elizabeth Steinbrenner 1 reported responses 4.94Eval / 5
Overall4.94 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Alan Paradise 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Mirela Alistar 3 reported responses 4.99Eval / 5
Overall4.99 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.96
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Ahmed Hamza 21 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.86
Technology4.94
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.24
Connection4.67
Contribution4.49
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.60
Reflection4.35
Respect4.96
Creativity4.56
Feedback4.78
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.65
Questions4.81
Rebecca Elizabeth Morrison 2 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.50
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Andrew Fredrick Meyer 1 reported responses 3.25Eval / 5
Overall3.25 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology3.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion2.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.00
Reflection4.00
Respect4.00
Creativity1.00
Feedback1.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.00
Questions3.00
Garrett J Schumacher 7 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.88
Contribution4.62
Discussion4.62
Inclusivity3.46
Grading4.88
Reflection4.73
Respect5.00
Creativity4.58
Feedback4.73
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.88
Questions5.00
Nikolaus Klassen 13 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.28
Synthesis4.27
Collaboration4.43
Connection4.43
Contribution4.19
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.63
Grading3.27
Reflection4.21
Respect4.59
Creativity3.65
Feedback3.30
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.24
Questions3.68
Daniel W Rankin 5 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.00
Reflection4.60
Respect4.40
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.60
Questions4.40
Libi Rose Striegl 2 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Sharri Zamore 3 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.70
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.30
Grading3.70
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.30
Gabriel Goehring Johnson 6 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.30
Connection5.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.80
Challenge5.00
Questions4.70
Ryo Suzuki 7 reported responses 3.94Eval / 5
Overall3.94 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.44
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.31
Collaboration3.15
Connection4.63
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity4.23
Grading3.97
Reflection4.59
Respect4.81
Creativity4.31
Feedback4.21
Interaction3.84
Challenge4.29
Questions4.77
Jonas Wills 2 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Ramin Ayanzadeh 4 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.25
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.35
Reflection4.85
Respect5.00
Creativity4.85
Feedback3.35
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Bor Yuh Chang 3 reported responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.50
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.70
Reflection4.70
Respect4.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Elizabeth Bradley 11 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.70
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.