Course record CSCI
CSCI 3753
Design and Analysis of Operating Systems
University of Colorado Boulder
1,074 grades30 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score18/100
Needs work
Yueqi Chen 136 grades · 1 term 3.38GPA
136 letter grades
Compare with the course
Chen vs. the course average
A
+35.0
B
−7.2
C
−14.8
D
−7.6
F
−5.4
Difference in percentage points.
6.2% withdrew · 9 of 145 enrolled.
Overall3.41 / 5
59 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.52
Technology3.62
Synthesis3.32
Collaboration2.83
Connection3.72
Contribution3.38
Discussion3.82
Inclusivity3.51
Grading3.03
Reflection3.68
Respect4.09
Creativity3.49
Feedback2.84
Interaction3.95
Challenge3.44
Questions3.35
Tam Ngoc Vu 126 grades · 1 term 2.83GPA
126 letter grades
Compare with the course
Vu vs. the course average
A
+11.9
B
−4.3
C
−5.4
D
+1.3
F
−3.5
Difference in percentage points.
11.3% withdrew · 16 of 142 enrolled.
Shivakant Mishra 127 grades · 1 term 2.56GPA
127 letter grades
Compare with the course
Mishra vs. the course average
A
−2.5
B
+2.6
C
+2.3
D
−4.3
F
+2.0
Difference in percentage points.
9.3% withdrew · 13 of 140 enrolled.
Overall3.22 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.20
Technology3.20
Synthesis3.30
Collaboration2.40
Connection3.40
Contribution2.80
Discussion3.20
Inclusivity2.70
Grading3.00
Reflection3.40
Respect4.20
Creativity3.50
Feedback2.60
Interaction3.30
Challenge3.60
Questions3.20
Carey Jay Herman 685 grades · 1 term 2.36GPA
685 letter grades
Compare with the course
Herman vs. the course average
A
−8.7
B
+1.8
C
+3.5
D
+2.1
F
+1.3
Difference in percentage points.
9.0% withdrew · 68 of 753 enrolled.
Overall3.50 / 5
158 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.74
Technology3.77
Synthesis3.64
Collaboration2.52
Connection4.03
Contribution3.14
Discussion3.77
Inclusivity2.43
Grading3.02
Reflection3.96
Respect3.51
Creativity4.08
Feedback3.09
Interaction3.35
Challenge4.10
Questions4.02
Biljith Thadichi 21 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.21
Technology4.93
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration4.08
Connection4.48
Contribution4.46
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.41
Grading4.88
Reflection4.79
Respect4.95
Creativity4.71
Feedback4.83
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.78
Questions4.98
Anh Nguyen 32 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.29
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.35
Contribution4.68
Discussion4.89
Inclusivity3.98
Grading4.70
Reflection4.52
Respect4.84
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.66
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.69
Questions4.76
Christopher Keith Godley 34 reported responses 4.12Eval / 5
Overall4.12 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.11
Technology4.81
Synthesis4.78
Collaboration2.61
Connection4.80
Contribution4.08
Discussion4.84
Inclusivity4.03
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.87
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.74
Interaction2.13
Challenge4.78
Questions4.81
Zaid Ahmed Al-Ali 45 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
45 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.28
Collaboration4.06
Connection4.04
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity3.95
Grading4.42
Reflection4.57
Respect4.83
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.28
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.74
Questions4.77
Shazal Irshad 7 reported responses 4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.00
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.20
Reflection4.10
Respect4.60
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.10
Questions4.40
Prasanth Prahladan 56 reported responses 4.06Eval / 5
Overall4.06 / 5
56 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.52
Synthesis4.46
Collaboration4.28
Connection4.46
Contribution4.56
Discussion4.66
Inclusivity4.28
Grading4.46
Reflection4.61
Respect4.76
Creativity4.48
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.56
Challenge4.63
Questions4.60
Ali Raza Tariq 8 reported responses 3.38Eval / 5
Overall3.38 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.30
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.40
Collaboration2.90
Connection2.90
Contribution3.50
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.60
Grading2.60
Reflection2.90
Respect4.30
Creativity3.40
Feedback3.40
Interaction3.50
Challenge3.60
Questions3.80
Nisha Murarka 17 reported responses 4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.96
Technology3.87
Synthesis3.81
Collaboration3.55
Connection3.61
Contribution3.63
Discussion4.19
Inclusivity3.43
Grading3.79
Reflection3.94
Respect4.37
Creativity3.32
Feedback3.49
Interaction3.85
Challenge4.29
Questions3.88
Akshay Abhyankar 38 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
38 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.51
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.49
Collaboration4.32
Connection4.07
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.62
Inclusivity4.48
Grading4.69
Reflection4.71
Respect4.72
Creativity4.49
Feedback4.36
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.63
Questions4.71
Cj Herman 104 reported responses 4.01Eval / 5
Overall4.01 / 5
104 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.18
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.22
Collaboration3.10
Connection4.26
Contribution3.60
Discussion4.14
Inclusivity3.20
Grading3.65
Reflection4.16
Respect3.81
Creativity4.42
Feedback3.43
Interaction3.52
Challenge4.46
Questions4.07
Sreeram Ganesan 7 reported responses 3.83Eval / 5
Overall3.83 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.30
Collaboration3.10
Connection4.00
Contribution3.70
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity3.10
Grading3.90
Reflection4.00
Respect4.30
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.70
Interaction3.60
Challenge3.90
Questions3.70
Tuan Tran 14 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology4.76
Synthesis4.69
Collaboration4.05
Connection4.67
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.71
Inclusivity3.75
Grading4.46
Reflection4.71
Respect4.94
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.28
Challenge4.89
Questions4.99
Jarek Reynolds 11 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.93
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.95
Collaboration4.88
Connection3.98
Contribution4.71
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity4.92
Grading4.93
Reflection4.02
Respect4.95
Creativity4.95
Feedback2.62
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.48
Questions3.12
Dylan Sain 7 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.70
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.70
Grading3.60
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.90
Questions4.70
Sriranga Kalkunte Ramaswamy 16 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.96
Technology4.97
Synthesis4.98
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.91
Contribution4.89
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity4.69
Grading4.97
Reflection4.92
Respect4.94
Creativity4.97
Feedback4.89
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.96
Questions4.96
Karthik Sairam 8 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.60
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.60
Grading3.90
Reflection4.90
Respect4.80
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.60
Questions4.40
Pranjal Aggarwal 4 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.30
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Anirudh Maiya 4 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.88
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.88
Collaboration4.77
Connection5.00
Contribution4.88
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.88
Respect5.00
Creativity4.77
Feedback4.88
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.88
Questions5.00
Kushal Nagarajan 3 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.30
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.30
Challenge5.00
Questions4.70
Seyedmohammadhossein Hosseini 16 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology4.60
Synthesis3.95
Collaboration3.80
Connection3.75
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.15
Grading3.80
Reflection4.35
Respect4.95
Creativity4.60
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.25
Challenge4.45
Questions4.40
Rhett Cole Hanscom 12 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.80
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.70
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.70
Reflection4.90
Respect4.80
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Jackson Sippe 152 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
152 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.65
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.45
Grading4.60
Reflection4.75
Respect4.90
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.35
Challenge4.90
Questions4.65
Stefan Caldararu 27 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.40
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.70
Reflection4.90
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Mateo Cantagallo 33 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.50
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.30
Reflection4.60
Respect4.50
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Nic Ammann 26 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.70
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.60
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Woongsub Shin 2 reported responses 4.00Eval / 5
Overall4.00 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.00
Respect4.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.00
Questions4.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.