Course record CSCI

CSCI 3403

Introduction to Cybersecurity

University of Colorado Boulder

817 grades15 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2022–2025
Flunk Score64/100
Strong

Professors 15 of 15

Alexander Peter Crimmin Curtiss 601 grades · 1 term 3.67GPA
79.7% A
13.6% B
4.2% C
0.5% D
2.0% F

601 letter grades

Compare with the course
Curtiss vs. the course average
A +9.1
B −6.6
C −2.4
D −0.4
F +0.3

Difference in percentage points.

1.8% withdrew · 11 of 612 enrolled.

Matthew Alexander Niemiec 216 grades · 1 term 3.21GPA
45.4% A
38.4% B
13.4% C
1.9% D
0.9% F

216 letter grades

Compare with the course
Niemiec vs. the course average
A −25.3
B +18.2
C +6.8
D +1.0
F −0.8

Difference in percentage points.

2.7% withdrew · 6 of 222 enrolled.

Seonwoo Kim 63 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

63 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.35
Connection4.63
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.43
Grading4.55
Reflection4.70
Respect4.85
Creativity4.63
Feedback4.43
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.68
Questions4.60
Meghana Reddy Kallam 46 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5

46 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.67
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.47
Connection4.63
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity4.73
Grading4.53
Reflection4.77
Respect4.93
Creativity4.63
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.77
Questions4.90
Jinpeng Miao 20 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.75
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.55
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.80
Questions4.75
Sriranga Kalkunte Ramaswamy 122 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5

122 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.76
Technology4.83
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.80
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.26
Grading4.54
Reflection4.77
Respect4.75
Creativity4.66
Feedback4.44
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.73
Questions4.71
Nour Rahal-Arabi 99 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5

99 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.61
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.56
Collaboration4.62
Connection4.75
Contribution4.54
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.11
Grading4.83
Reflection4.67
Respect4.77
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.76
Challenge4.68
Questions4.81
Rachna Konigari 12 reported responses 4.96Eval / 5
Overall4.96 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.90
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Ryan Quinlan 80 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5

80 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.75
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.75
Reflection4.70
Respect4.55
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.65
Questions4.85
Kirby James Linvill 22 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5

22 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.90
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.70
Reflection4.90
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.80
Challenge5.00
Questions4.90
Nic Ammann 15 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.80
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.60
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.60
Questions4.70
Qinrun Dai 19 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.70
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.40
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Jackson Sippe 21 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.80
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.40
Reflection4.60
Respect4.70
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions4.60
Dorothea French 11 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.80
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Madeleine Gilliatt Wade 18 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.70
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.30
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.80
Questions4.70
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.