Course record CSCI

CSCI 3302

Introduction to Robotics

University of Colorado Boulder

873 grades21 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score35/100
Below average

Professors 21 of 21

Bradley Hamilton Hayes 178 grades · 1 term 3.75GPA
78.7% A
19.7% B
1.7% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

178 letter grades

Compare with the course
Hayes vs. the course average
A +19.7
B −3.7
C −8.9
D −3.4
F −3.7

Difference in percentage points.

2.2% withdrew · 4 of 182 enrolled.

Alessandro Roncone 296 grades · 1 term 3.33GPA
60.1% A
22.3% B
13.5% C
1.4% D
2.7% F

296 letter grades

Compare with the course
Roncone vs. the course average
A +1.1
B −1.1
C +3.0
D −2.1
F −1.0

Difference in percentage points.

3.0% withdrew · 9 of 305 enrolled.

Nicolaus J Correll 388 grades · 1 term 3.03GPA
47.9% A
26.5% B
12.6% C
6.7% D
6.2% F

388 letter grades

Compare with the course
Correll vs. the course average
A −11.1
B +3.2
C +2.1
D +3.3
F +2.5

Difference in percentage points.

2.3% withdrew · 9 of 397 enrolled.

Travis Hainsworth 11 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.95GPA
100.0% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

11 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 11 enrolled.

Nikolaus Correll 89 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5

89 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.39
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.01
Collaboration3.97
Connection4.59
Contribution3.76
Discussion4.61
Inclusivity2.72
Grading4.66
Reflection4.28
Respect4.82
Creativity4.27
Feedback3.57
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.58
Questions4.54
Shivendra Agrawal 62 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

62 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.44
Technology4.86
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.51
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.74
Inclusivity4.12
Grading4.33
Reflection4.54
Respect4.78
Creativity4.59
Feedback4.31
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.84
Questions4.70
Anuj Pasricha 45 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5

45 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.48
Technology4.87
Synthesis4.68
Collaboration4.72
Connection4.50
Contribution4.52
Discussion4.46
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.43
Reflection4.49
Respect4.83
Creativity4.53
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.73
Questions4.33
Himanshu Gupta 15 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.50
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.75
Reflection4.65
Respect4.75
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.70
Questions4.65
Mary Martin 11 reported responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.00
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.10
Grading3.90
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.10
Questions4.20
Tuhina Tripathi 8 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.60
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.30
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.60
Questions4.20
Yi-Shiuan Tung 27 reported responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5

27 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.21
Technology4.07
Synthesis3.21
Collaboration3.65
Connection3.54
Contribution2.88
Discussion3.74
Inclusivity2.64
Grading2.95
Reflection3.58
Respect4.01
Creativity3.50
Feedback2.97
Interaction3.74
Challenge4.00
Questions4.08
Mary Etta West 13 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.30
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
William Xie 15 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.12
Technology4.58
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.89
Connection3.61
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.15
Reflection4.16
Respect4.58
Creativity4.27
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.61
Challenge4.27
Questions4.42
Anna Zavei-Boroda 9 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.80
Connection3.40
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.60
Reflection4.00
Respect4.40
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.30
Questions4.40
Stefan Caldararu 13 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.86
Technology4.95
Synthesis3.98
Collaboration4.79
Connection4.86
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.86
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.50
Reflection4.82
Respect4.98
Creativity4.18
Feedback3.28
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.09
Questions4.57
Brendan Crowe 11 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.90
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.40
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.70
Reflection4.20
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Mohammed Adib Oumer 9 reported responses 2.99Eval / 5
Overall2.99 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.80
Technology3.20
Synthesis2.80
Collaboration3.20
Connection3.10
Contribution2.40
Discussion3.20
Inclusivity2.20
Grading2.60
Reflection3.10
Respect3.60
Creativity3.20
Feedback2.30
Interaction3.60
Challenge3.20
Questions3.20
Chen Liu 2 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Srikrishna Bangalore Raghu 12 reported responses 3.98Eval / 5
Overall3.98 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.20
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.10
Connection3.80
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.90
Reflection4.00
Respect4.40
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.40
Challenge3.80
Questions4.10
Chi-Hui Lin 12 reported responses 4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.10
Connection3.80
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.30
Reflection4.00
Respect4.20
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.00
Questions4.00
Jay Vakil 10 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.20
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.20
Reflection4.40
Respect4.30
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.30
Questions4.30
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.