Course record CSCI

CSCI 3104

Algorithms

University of Colorado Boulder

2,387 grades61 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score27/100
Below average

Professors 61 of 61

Divya E. Vernerey 143 grades · 1 term 3.85GPA
93.0% A
3.5% B
1.4% C
1.4% D
0.7% F

143 letter grades

Compare with the course
Vernerey vs. the course average
A +33.2
B −15.7
C −10.4
D −1.6
F −5.4

Difference in percentage points.

0.7% withdrew · 1 of 144 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Lijun Chen 311 grades · 1 term 3.41GPA
68.2% A
13.8% B
14.1% C
1.3% D
2.6% F

311 letter grades

Compare with the course
Chen vs. the course average
A +8.3
B −5.4
C +2.3
D −1.7
F −3.5

Difference in percentage points.

5.8% withdrew · 19 of 330 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Ryan Matthew Layer 236 grades · 1 term 3.38GPA
69.9% A
17.4% B
2.1% C
4.2% D
6.4% F

236 letter grades

Compare with the course
Layer vs. the course average
A +10.1
B −1.9
C −9.7
D +1.2
F +0.2

Difference in percentage points.

2.1% withdrew · 5 of 241 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Rachel Suzanne-Tutmaher Cox 335 grades · 1 term 3.31GPA
57.3% A
24.5% B
14.0% C
1.2% D
3.0% F

335 letter grades

Compare with the course
Cox vs. the course average
A −2.5
B +5.2
C +2.2
D −1.8
F −3.1

Difference in percentage points.

4.8% withdrew · 17 of 352 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Chandra Kanth Nagesh 506 grades · 1 term 3.29GPA
66.0% A
17.4% B
6.5% C
2.0% D
8.1% F

506 letter grades

Compare with the course
Nagesh vs. the course average
A +6.2
B −1.8
C −5.3
D −1.0
F +2.0

Difference in percentage points.

1.9% withdrew · 10 of 516 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Joshua Abraham Grochow 348 grades · 1 term 3.16GPA
58.6% A
16.7% B
14.9% C
3.7% D
6.0% F

348 letter grades

Compare with the course
Grochow vs. the course average
A −1.2
B −2.6
C +3.1
D +0.7
F −0.1

Difference in percentage points.

6.2% withdrew · 23 of 371 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Samantha Lee Molnar 141 grades · 1 term 2.93GPA
30.5% A
38.3% B
30.5% C
0.0% D
0.7% F

141 letter grades

Compare with the course
Molnar vs. the course average
A −29.3
B +19.1
C +18.7
D −3.0
F −5.4

Difference in percentage points.

5.4% withdrew · 8 of 149 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Charles Anthony Carlson 119 grades · 1 term 2.80GPA
44.5% A
23.5% B
12.6% C
5.9% D
13.4% F

119 letter grades

Compare with the course
Carlson vs. the course average
A −15.3
B +4.3
C +0.8
D +2.9
F +7.3

Difference in percentage points.

15.0% withdrew · 21 of 140 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Ewan Stephen Douglas Davies 101 grades · 1 term 2.69GPA
44.6% A
14.9% B
17.8% C
9.9% D
12.9% F

101 letter grades

Compare with the course
Davies vs. the course average
A −15.3
B −4.4
C +6.0
D +6.9
F +6.8

Difference in percentage points.

17.2% withdrew · 21 of 122 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Benjamin F Waggoner 147 grades · 1 term 2.57GPA
32.0% A
30.6% B
15.6% C
8.2% D
13.6% F

147 letter grades

Compare with the course
Waggoner vs. the course average
A −27.9
B +11.4
C +3.8
D +5.1
F +7.5

Difference in percentage points.

3.3% withdrew · 5 of 152 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Vishnu Murali 1 reported responses 4.00Eval / 5
Overall4.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.00
Respect4.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.00
Questions4.00
Open full professor record
Michael Levet 28 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

28 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.84
Technology4.76
Synthesis4.77
Collaboration3.99
Connection4.52
Contribution4.16
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.18
Grading4.67
Reflection4.70
Respect4.95
Creativity4.88
Feedback4.31
Interaction4.58
Challenge4.54
Questions4.94
Open full professor record
Abteen A Ebrahimi 41 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

41 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.69
Technology4.66
Synthesis4.51
Collaboration4.52
Connection4.22
Contribution4.86
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.63
Grading4.36
Reflection4.70
Respect4.98
Creativity4.82
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.73
Questions4.62
Open full professor record
Abhilash Raghavendra Jahagirdar 5 reported responses 4.07Eval / 5
Overall4.07 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.40
Connection3.00
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.80
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.00
Questions4.40
Open full professor record
Yichen Wang 10 reported responses 3.47Eval / 5
Overall3.47 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology3.60
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration3.00
Connection3.50
Contribution3.50
Discussion3.50
Inclusivity3.90
Grading3.30
Reflection3.50
Respect4.10
Creativity3.40
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.40
Questions3.90
Open full professor record
Wanshan Yang 13 reported responses 3.59Eval / 5
Overall3.59 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.04
Technology4.03
Synthesis3.84
Collaboration3.58
Connection3.54
Contribution3.65
Discussion4.18
Inclusivity3.47
Grading3.15
Reflection3.88
Respect4.54
Creativity3.31
Feedback3.31
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.99
Questions4.04
Open full professor record
Robert L Green 13 reported responses 3.38Eval / 5
Overall3.38 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology3.35
Synthesis3.25
Collaboration3.20
Connection3.10
Contribution4.00
Discussion3.75
Inclusivity2.65
Grading3.00
Reflection3.20
Respect4.35
Creativity3.05
Feedback2.65
Interaction3.50
Challenge3.60
Questions3.60
Open full professor record
Camden Elliott-Williams 37 reported responses 4.07Eval / 5
Overall4.07 / 5

37 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.78
Connection3.79
Contribution3.55
Discussion4.47
Inclusivity4.35
Grading3.87
Reflection4.24
Respect4.68
Creativity3.83
Feedback3.63
Interaction4.66
Challenge4.17
Questions4.42
Open full professor record
Rachel Suzanne Tutmaher 87 reported responses 4.04Eval / 5
Overall4.04 / 5

87 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.91
Collaboration3.68
Connection3.81
Contribution3.69
Discussion4.19
Inclusivity3.81
Grading4.19
Reflection4.20
Respect4.69
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.89
Interaction4.29
Challenge4.30
Questions4.20
Open full professor record
Sebastian Hartmut Laudenschlager 12 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.10
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.10
Reflection4.30
Respect4.90
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.30
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Dhamma Kimpara 16 reported responses 4.06Eval / 5
Overall4.06 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.29
Connection4.20
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.80
Reflection4.00
Respect4.80
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.69
Questions4.79
Open full professor record
Caleb Sebastian Escobedo 29 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5

29 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration3.93
Connection4.03
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.53
Inclusivity4.17
Grading4.43
Reflection4.67
Respect4.57
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.53
Challenge4.33
Questions4.37
Open full professor record
Steven Kordonowy 11 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.25
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.05
Grading4.55
Reflection4.40
Respect4.50
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.50
Questions4.40
Open full professor record
Connor Brooks 23 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.12
Collaboration4.22
Connection3.91
Contribution4.29
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity3.02
Grading4.55
Reflection4.55
Respect4.68
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.18
Challenge4.62
Questions4.95
Open full professor record
Venkata Vimal Kakaraparthi 11 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.82
Technology4.71
Synthesis4.69
Collaboration4.81
Connection4.43
Contribution4.66
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.56
Grading4.69
Reflection5.00
Respect4.87
Creativity4.54
Feedback4.56
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.82
Questions4.96
Open full professor record
Adam Josef Wiemerslage 11 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology4.41
Synthesis3.98
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.00
Contribution4.82
Discussion4.84
Inclusivity4.72
Grading4.84
Reflection4.43
Respect4.91
Creativity3.93
Feedback4.41
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.93
Questions4.91
Open full professor record
Sagi Shaier 5 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.60
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Ethan Wesley Hobbs 1 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology3.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.00
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge5.00
Questions3.00
Open full professor record
Maneesha Papireddygari 6 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology3.40
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.40
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.60
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback3.30
Interaction4.50
Challenge5.00
Questions4.30
Open full professor record
Benjamin Little 8 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration4.55
Connection3.55
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.46
Grading3.70
Reflection4.23
Respect5.00
Creativity3.46
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.07
Questions4.45
Open full professor record
Chi-Hui Lin 31 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5

31 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology4.66
Synthesis4.16
Collaboration3.97
Connection4.03
Contribution3.80
Discussion3.85
Inclusivity3.19
Grading3.30
Reflection4.01
Respect4.84
Creativity3.54
Feedback3.99
Interaction3.98
Challenge4.13
Questions4.17
Open full professor record
Arvind Sreenivas 21 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.74
Technology4.84
Synthesis4.51
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.50
Contribution4.72
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.86
Grading4.53
Reflection4.83
Respect5.00
Creativity4.63
Feedback4.62
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.82
Questions4.75
Open full professor record
Kate Bowers 8 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.60
Connection3.10
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.00
Reflection4.30
Respect4.90
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.40
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.40
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Enrique Boswell Nueve Iv 4 reported responses 4.94Eval / 5
Overall4.94 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.80
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.70
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Rameez Wajid 17 reported responses 3.46Eval / 5
Overall3.46 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.91
Technology3.72
Synthesis3.87
Collaboration3.44
Connection3.75
Contribution4.06
Discussion4.33
Inclusivity4.01
Grading3.52
Reflection3.99
Respect4.37
Creativity3.98
Feedback3.19
Interaction3.98
Challenge3.89
Questions3.87
Open full professor record
Christopher Keith Godley 15 reported responses 3.68Eval / 5
Overall3.68 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology4.25
Synthesis3.55
Collaboration3.10
Connection3.45
Contribution3.95
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity3.55
Grading3.15
Reflection3.50
Respect4.70
Creativity3.75
Feedback3.20
Interaction4.05
Challenge3.70
Questions3.80
Open full professor record
Nisha Murarka 3 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.30
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.00
Reflection4.70
Respect4.70
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.30
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Gã¼Lce Kardes 3 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.70
Connection3.70
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.70
Reflection4.30
Respect5.00
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.30
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Robby Green 36 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5

36 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.09
Technology3.33
Synthesis3.86
Collaboration3.23
Connection3.69
Contribution3.55
Discussion3.99
Inclusivity3.51
Grading3.55
Reflection4.08
Respect4.40
Creativity4.16
Feedback3.39
Interaction4.09
Challenge3.85
Questions4.08
Open full professor record
Enrique Nueve 24 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5

24 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.82
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.71
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.77
Contribution4.84
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.78
Grading4.76
Reflection4.75
Respect4.94
Creativity4.95
Feedback4.87
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.83
Questions4.92
Open full professor record
Gulce Kardes 15 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.05
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.10
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.25
Reflection4.45
Respect4.65
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.95
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.40
Questions4.20
Open full professor record
Doncey Albin 11 reported responses 3.62Eval / 5
Overall3.62 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology3.60
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.70
Connection3.80
Contribution3.90
Discussion3.40
Inclusivity3.70
Grading3.70
Reflection3.70
Respect4.10
Creativity3.30
Feedback3.10
Interaction4.30
Challenge3.30
Questions3.00
Open full professor record
Christopher Ojukwu 8 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.20
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.60
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.30
Grading3.90
Reflection4.90
Respect4.80
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.10
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Amanda Ellen Forrest 4 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.50
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.20
Respect4.80
Creativity3.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.00
Questions4.20
Open full professor record
Amit Kiran Rege 15 reported responses 3.95Eval / 5
Overall3.95 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.66
Technology4.49
Synthesis4.61
Collaboration4.16
Connection4.33
Contribution3.87
Discussion4.03
Inclusivity4.79
Grading4.58
Reflection4.49
Respect4.36
Creativity4.36
Feedback4.49
Interaction4.57
Challenge4.70
Questions4.58
Open full professor record
Drona Khurana 10 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.82
Technology4.89
Synthesis4.86
Collaboration4.81
Connection3.98
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.86
Inclusivity4.23
Grading4.76
Reflection4.80
Respect4.95
Creativity4.92
Feedback4.83
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.80
Questions4.86
Open full professor record
Melody Hsu 8 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.83
Technology4.51
Synthesis3.83
Collaboration3.54
Connection3.23
Contribution3.83
Discussion3.83
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.73
Reflection4.03
Respect4.03
Creativity3.25
Feedback3.53
Interaction4.51
Challenge3.83
Questions4.03
Open full professor record
Shamal Shaikh 56 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

56 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.23
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.22
Collaboration3.68
Connection4.09
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.88
Grading4.20
Reflection4.39
Respect4.80
Creativity4.29
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.25
Challenge4.48
Questions4.52
Open full professor record
Mary Monroe 32 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5

32 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.82
Connection4.38
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.27
Reflection4.77
Respect4.87
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.79
Questions4.86
Open full professor record
Sourav Chakraborty 19 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.64
Synthesis4.49
Collaboration4.37
Connection4.36
Contribution4.61
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.81
Grading4.45
Reflection4.42
Respect4.93
Creativity4.51
Feedback4.61
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.69
Questions4.72
Open full professor record
Vimal Kakaraparthi 13 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.10
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.35
Reflection4.65
Respect4.85
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.45
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Elias Lindgren 9 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.72
Collaboration4.88
Connection4.54
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.88
Grading4.71
Reflection4.88
Respect5.00
Creativity4.82
Feedback4.82
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.91
Questions4.95
Open full professor record
Ali Marashian Saraei 16 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.49
Technology4.48
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.41
Contribution4.68
Discussion4.72
Inclusivity4.53
Grading4.23
Reflection4.49
Respect4.74
Creativity4.51
Feedback4.68
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.26
Questions4.30
Open full professor record
Julie Jarzemsky 3 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.30
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect4.30
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Carlina Wharton-Bucher 6 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.20
Contribution4.30
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Peter Ly 29 reported responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5

29 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.12
Technology4.39
Synthesis3.84
Collaboration3.65
Connection3.51
Contribution3.88
Discussion4.42
Inclusivity4.08
Grading3.49
Reflection4.08
Respect4.65
Creativity3.94
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.49
Challenge4.04
Questions4.54
Open full professor record
Elise Tate 10 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.95
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.78
Connection4.82
Contribution4.68
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.93
Grading4.95
Reflection4.78
Respect4.95
Creativity4.57
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.95
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Corey Murphey 2 reported responses 3.97Eval / 5
Overall3.97 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.50
Contribution3.50
Discussion3.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading3.50
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.00
Questions3.00
Open full professor record
Zach Atkins 15 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.50
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.80
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Jacob Urisman 6 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.30
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Amin Falah 2 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.