Course record CSCI
CSCI 3002
Fundamentals of Human Computer Interaction
University of Colorado Boulder
1,939 grades38 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score56/100
Mixed record
Alfonso Gonzalo Bastias 233 grades · 1 term 3.85GPA
233 letter grades
Compare with the course
Bastias vs. the course average
A
+9.3
B
−6.5
C
−1.1
D
−0.4
F
−1.2
Difference in percentage points.
0.9% withdrew · 2 of 235 enrolled.
Overall3.89 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology3.80
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.40
Contribution4.00
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity4.30
Grading3.90
Reflection3.80
Respect4.60
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.30
Interaction4.20
Challenge3.50
Questions3.70
Supriya Manikonda Keshavaiah Naidu 467 grades · 1 term 3.74GPA
467 letter grades
Compare with the course
Naidu vs. the course average
A
+0.9
B
+0.9
C
−1.1
D
−0.4
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
2.7% withdrew · 13 of 480 enrolled.
Overall4.23 / 5
43 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.60
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.20
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.00
Questions4.40
Mirela Alistar 383 grades · 1 term 3.71GPA
383 letter grades
Compare with the course
Alistar vs. the course average
A
+1.0
B
−1.2
C
−0.2
D
+0.2
F
+0.2
Difference in percentage points.
2.8% withdrew · 11 of 394 enrolled.
Overall3.84 / 5
235 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.21
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration4.47
Connection4.34
Contribution4.34
Discussion4.53
Inclusivity4.34
Grading4.29
Reflection4.16
Respect4.82
Creativity4.01
Feedback3.94
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.28
Questions4.39
David Philp Quigley 415 grades · 1 term 3.69GPA
415 letter grades
Compare with the course
Quigley vs. the course average
A
−0.9
B
+0.2
C
+0.1
D
+0.4
F
+0.3
Difference in percentage points.
2.1% withdrew · 9 of 424 enrolled.
Overall4.21 / 5
186 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology3.76
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.31
Connection4.31
Contribution4.01
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.55
Grading3.96
Reflection4.20
Respect4.16
Creativity4.06
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.40
Challenge3.61
Questions4.20
Annika Muehlbradt 244 grades · 1 term 3.60GPA
244 letter grades
Compare with the course
Muehlbradt vs. the course average
A
−3.9
B
+1.8
C
+1.3
D
−0.4
F
+1.2
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 244 enrolled.
Overall4.59 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.80
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.65
Reflection4.55
Respect4.90
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.50
Questions4.30
Shaun Kevin Kane 197 grades · 1 term 3.59GPA
197 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kane vs. the course average
A
−8.5
B
+5.1
C
+2.7
D
+0.7
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
3.0% withdrew · 6 of 203 enrolled.
Overall4.34 / 5
93 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.60
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.40
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.30
Questions4.50
Daniel Leithinger 93 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5
93 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.60
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.40
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions4.60
Varsha Srikanth Koushik 34 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.01
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.37
Contribution4.37
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.29
Grading4.27
Reflection4.33
Respect4.81
Creativity4.44
Feedback3.97
Interaction4.56
Challenge4.03
Questions4.35
Shivendra Agrawal 21 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.70
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.70
Reflection4.40
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.70
Xiaozhe Zhang 12 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.60
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.90
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.40
Questions4.80
Sagi Shaier 84 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
84 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.97
Technology4.42
Synthesis4.28
Collaboration4.57
Connection4.22
Contribution4.31
Discussion4.62
Inclusivity4.16
Grading4.29
Reflection4.17
Respect4.62
Creativity4.23
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.62
Challenge4.16
Questions4.72
Lucca Otaviano Eloy 21 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.40
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.20
Reflection4.50
Respect4.90
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.00
Questions4.40
Sankaranarayanan Nagarajan 13 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.65
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration4.65
Connection3.65
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.45
Reflection3.60
Respect4.90
Creativity3.85
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.10
Questions4.75
Lateefah Al Naimi 4 reported responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.85
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.65
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.85
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.85
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.85
Questions5.00
Mary Etta West 54 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
54 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.40
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.45
Reflection4.45
Respect4.75
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.40
Questions4.70
Seonwoo Kim 25 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.20
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.40
Reflection4.20
Respect4.60
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.00
Questions4.40
Xu Han 12 reported responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.95
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.90
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.75
Respect4.95
Creativity4.90
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Julie Jarzemsky 18 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.92
Technology4.98
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.69
Connection4.96
Contribution4.95
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity4.98
Grading4.68
Reflection4.95
Respect5.00
Creativity4.33
Feedback4.69
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.69
Questions4.98
Maram Abdulhai Kurdi 29 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.32
Technology4.68
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.38
Connection4.57
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.38
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.78
Reflection4.43
Respect4.77
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.35
Questions4.70
Nuha Abdulrahman Albadi 4 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Ali Raza 11 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.65
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.70
Grading5.00
Reflection4.30
Respect4.85
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.25
Questions4.90
Cornelius Adejoro 69 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
69 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.48
Technology4.52
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration4.84
Connection4.64
Contribution4.68
Discussion4.46
Inclusivity4.28
Grading4.16
Reflection4.51
Respect4.63
Creativity4.54
Feedback4.24
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.38
Questions4.44
Dorothea French 29 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.93
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.97
Collaboration4.49
Connection4.60
Contribution4.06
Discussion4.43
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.65
Reflection4.15
Respect4.60
Creativity4.41
Feedback3.99
Interaction4.41
Challenge4.09
Questions4.79
Mary Martin 12 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.93
Technology4.99
Synthesis4.94
Collaboration4.98
Connection4.96
Contribution4.98
Discussion4.96
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.97
Reflection4.96
Respect4.99
Creativity4.96
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.96
Questions4.99
Michael Jeffery Daniel Hoefer 4 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Jay Luther 3 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.70
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback3.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.30
Questions5.00
Alex Leto 23 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.64
Technology4.93
Synthesis4.71
Collaboration4.91
Connection4.85
Contribution4.96
Discussion4.96
Inclusivity4.86
Grading4.92
Reflection4.81
Respect5.00
Creativity4.83
Feedback4.91
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.96
Enora Rice 6 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.70
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Ali Marashian Saraei 20 reported responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.02
Technology4.07
Synthesis4.34
Collaboration4.44
Connection4.18
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.41
Inclusivity4.04
Grading4.20
Reflection4.32
Respect4.23
Creativity4.24
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.39
Challenge4.22
Questions4.36
Marissa Chitwood 20 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.17
Technology4.26
Synthesis4.22
Collaboration4.35
Connection4.30
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.74
Inclusivity4.22
Grading4.52
Reflection4.39
Respect4.57
Creativity4.09
Feedback4.13
Interaction4.61
Challenge4.35
Questions4.70
Sepideh Mohammadi Bolguri 14 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.22
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.84
Connection4.24
Contribution4.59
Discussion4.37
Inclusivity4.76
Grading3.88
Reflection4.09
Respect4.42
Creativity4.36
Feedback3.88
Interaction4.41
Challenge4.08
Questions3.90
Reagan Mckee 16 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.76
Technology4.99
Synthesis4.78
Collaboration4.97
Connection4.46
Contribution4.96
Discussion4.96
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.97
Reflection4.47
Respect4.78
Creativity4.97
Feedback4.96
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.75
Questions4.97
Michelle Ramsahoye 15 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.48
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.26
Collaboration4.28
Connection4.48
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.49
Inclusivity4.06
Grading4.50
Reflection4.05
Respect4.50
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.56
Interaction4.49
Challenge4.25
Questions4.49
Aidan Dylan Chopra 95 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5
95 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.50
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.30
Reflection4.30
Respect4.50
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.20
Questions4.50
Nolan Brady 18 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.70
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.65
Reflection4.50
Respect4.60
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.35
Questions4.85
Alex Arnold 6 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.80
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.30
Reflection4.30
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.00
Questions4.70
Mohsena Ashraf 4 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.20
Respect4.50
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge3.80
Questions4.50
Ada Zhao 5 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.80
Contribution4.60
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.80
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.40
Questions4.60
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.