Course record CSCI

CSCI 1300

Computer Science 1: Starting Computing

University of Colorado Boulder

5,426 grades135 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score12/100
Needs work

Professors 135 of 135

Ioana Nicolaescu Fleming 281 grades · 1 term 3.32GPA
72.6% A
9.6% B
2.1% C
9.3% D
6.4% F

281 letter grades

Compare with the course
Fleming vs. the course average
A +25.6
B −10.8
C −9.1
D +1.1
F −6.8

Difference in percentage points.

8.8% withdrew · 27 of 308 enrolled.

Open full professor record
David Philp Quigley 135 grades · 1 term 3.24GPA
71.9% A
5.2% B
3.7% C
11.9% D
7.4% F

135 letter grades

Compare with the course
Quigley vs. the course average
A +24.8
B −15.2
C −7.5
D +3.7
F −5.8

Difference in percentage points.

5.6% withdrew · 8 of 143 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Murray William Cox 322 grades · 1 term 3.08GPA
55.6% A
18.6% B
12.4% C
6.5% D
6.8% F

322 letter grades

Compare with the course
Cox vs. the course average
A +8.6
B −1.8
C +1.2
D −1.6
F −6.4

Difference in percentage points.

12.5% withdrew · 46 of 368 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Asa M Ashraf 273 grades · 1 term 2.90GPA
48.7% A
22.0% B
11.4% C
6.6% D
11.4% F

273 letter grades

Compare with the course
Ashraf vs. the course average
A +1.7
B +1.6
C +0.1
D −1.6
F −1.9

Difference in percentage points.

16.0% withdrew · 52 of 325 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Supriya Manikonda Keshavaiah Naidu 1,608 grades · 1 term 2.90GPA
51.2% A
19.1% B
10.6% C
7.6% D
11.5% F

1,608 letter grades

Compare with the course
Naidu vs. the course average
A +4.2
B −1.3
C −0.6
D −0.6
F −1.7

Difference in percentage points.

12.0% withdrew · 219 of 1,827 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Michael Jeffery Daniel Hoefer 709 grades · 1 term 2.86GPA
52.2% A
17.3% B
9.9% C
6.9% D
13.7% F

709 letter grades

Compare with the course
Hoefer vs. the course average
A +5.2
B −3.1
C −1.4
D −1.2
F +0.5

Difference in percentage points.

10.4% withdrew · 82 of 791 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Pei Hsiu Yeh 500 grades · 1 term 2.72GPA
49.8% A
16.4% B
8.2% C
8.2% D
17.4% F

500 letter grades

Compare with the course
Yeh vs. the course average
A +2.8
B −4.0
C −3.0
D +0.1
F +4.2

Difference in percentage points.

14.4% withdrew · 84 of 584 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Nicolaus J Correll 242 grades · 1 term 2.70GPA
41.7% A
25.2% B
11.2% C
7.0% D
14.9% F

242 letter grades

Compare with the course
Correll vs. the course average
A −5.3
B +4.8
C −0.1
D −1.1
F +1.7

Difference in percentage points.

14.8% withdrew · 42 of 284 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Chanheum Park 206 grades · 1 term 2.50GPA
28.2% A
31.1% B
17.0% C
9.2% D
14.6% F

206 letter grades

Compare with the course
Park vs. the course average
A −18.9
B +10.7
C +5.8
D +1.1
F +1.3

Difference in percentage points.

12.3% withdrew · 29 of 235 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Vinay Nagalapura Ramesh 207 grades · 1 term 2.44GPA
29.5% A
29.0% B
14.0% C
11.1% D
16.4% F

207 letter grades

Compare with the course
Ramesh vs. the course average
A −17.5
B +8.6
C +2.8
D +3.0
F +3.2

Difference in percentage points.

7.6% withdrew · 17 of 224 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Christopher Keith Godley 813 grades · 1 term 2.41GPA
30.8% A
26.1% B
15.7% C
9.8% D
17.6% F

813 letter grades

Compare with the course
Godley vs. the course average
A −16.3
B +5.7
C +4.5
D +1.7
F +4.4

Difference in percentage points.

8.8% withdrew · 78 of 891 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Rhonda Olcott Hoenigman 130 grades · 1 term 2.26GPA
20.0% A
33.8% B
20.0% C
7.7% D
18.5% F

130 letter grades

Compare with the course
Hoenigman vs. the course average
A −27.0
B +13.4
C +8.8
D −0.5
F +5.2

Difference in percentage points.

7.8% withdrew · 11 of 141 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Elizabeth Spaulding 27 reported responses 3.93Eval / 5
Overall3.93 / 5

27 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.76
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.02
Collaboration3.90
Connection3.25
Contribution3.88
Discussion4.27
Inclusivity3.63
Grading3.27
Reflection3.86
Respect4.27
Creativity4.32
Feedback3.63
Interaction3.90
Challenge3.86
Questions4.13
Open full professor record
Andrew T Weller 4 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.65
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.75
Connection3.50
Contribution4.15
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity2.50
Grading4.35
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.65
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.15
Questions4.65
Open full professor record
Manjunath Rao Nagaraja Rao 13 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.88
Synthesis3.85
Collaboration4.12
Connection3.90
Contribution4.33
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity2.95
Grading3.88
Reflection4.45
Respect4.70
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.33
Interaction4.43
Challenge4.40
Questions4.43
Open full professor record
Julia Romero 12 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.27
Connection4.33
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.43
Grading4.50
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity3.70
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.52
Challenge3.83
Questions4.50
Open full professor record
Nicholas Conlon 6 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.27
Collaboration4.43
Connection5.00
Contribution4.83
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity3.35
Grading4.17
Reflection4.23
Respect4.83
Creativity4.17
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.07
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Arjun Ramesh Rao 26 reported responses 4.00Eval / 5
Overall4.00 / 5

26 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.96
Technology4.71
Synthesis4.24
Collaboration3.31
Connection3.14
Contribution4.42
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity3.47
Grading4.29
Reflection4.03
Respect4.56
Creativity4.36
Feedback4.11
Interaction4.74
Challenge4.49
Questions4.12
Open full professor record
Madhusudhan Aithal Mahabhaleshwara 22 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

22 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.14
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.16
Collaboration3.93
Connection3.81
Contribution4.09
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity3.76
Grading4.18
Reflection4.06
Respect4.58
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.08
Challenge4.42
Questions4.59
Open full professor record
Maria Pozo Stull 30 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

30 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.60
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.59
Grading4.50
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Shree Krishna Subburaj 17 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.34
Technology4.68
Synthesis3.84
Collaboration3.80
Connection3.58
Contribution4.38
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity2.78
Grading4.22
Reflection4.30
Respect4.86
Creativity3.86
Feedback4.32
Interaction4.44
Challenge4.20
Questions4.56
Open full professor record
William L Huynh 10 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.30
Connection3.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.90
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.75
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Sanskar Katiyar 18 reported responses 4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.02
Technology4.46
Synthesis4.26
Collaboration3.74
Connection3.42
Contribution4.32
Discussion4.56
Inclusivity3.43
Grading4.26
Reflection4.10
Respect4.62
Creativity4.04
Feedback4.06
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.40
Questions4.44
Open full professor record
Siddhant Sushilkumar Keshkar 25 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

25 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.91
Technology4.66
Synthesis4.13
Collaboration3.46
Connection4.07
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.59
Inclusivity2.68
Grading4.22
Reflection4.19
Respect4.47
Creativity3.91
Feedback4.47
Interaction4.29
Challenge4.35
Questions4.38
Open full professor record
Anuj Pasricha 34 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5

34 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.44
Technology4.79
Synthesis4.48
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.00
Contribution4.17
Discussion4.69
Inclusivity3.93
Grading4.31
Reflection4.57
Respect4.70
Creativity4.29
Feedback4.39
Interaction4.37
Challenge4.53
Questions4.81
Open full professor record
Sourav Chakraborty 29 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5

29 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.89
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.69
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.58
Contribution4.61
Discussion4.71
Inclusivity4.76
Grading4.69
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.59
Feedback4.68
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.60
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Christen Alannah Malloy 30 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

30 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.41
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration4.41
Connection4.29
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.06
Grading4.24
Reflection4.48
Respect4.85
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.46
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.50
Questions4.82
Open full professor record
Isha Karki 9 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.48
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.44
Collaboration4.54
Connection4.33
Contribution4.54
Discussion4.48
Inclusivity4.38
Grading4.48
Reflection4.48
Respect4.50
Creativity4.29
Feedback4.37
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.56
Questions4.56
Open full professor record
Christopher Gavin Ii 11 reported responses 3.87Eval / 5
Overall3.87 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.38
Synthesis3.83
Collaboration3.58
Connection3.68
Contribution3.88
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity2.50
Grading3.55
Reflection4.25
Respect4.38
Creativity3.30
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.15
Challenge3.80
Questions4.27
Open full professor record
Alici Edwards 14 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration3.85
Connection3.60
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.10
Reflection4.40
Respect4.85
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.30
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Calista N Nguyen 15 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.98
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.07
Collaboration3.85
Connection3.90
Contribution4.24
Discussion4.52
Inclusivity3.25
Grading4.06
Reflection4.19
Respect4.44
Creativity3.75
Feedback3.65
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.02
Questions4.21
Open full professor record
Siddartha Shankar 6 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.67
Technology4.83
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.00
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.00
Reflection4.83
Respect4.83
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.67
Interaction4.17
Challenge4.67
Questions4.50
Open full professor record
Anirudh Singh Rathore 4 reported responses 4.18Eval / 5
Overall4.18 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.33
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.67
Connection3.33
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.33
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.33
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.33
Interaction5.00
Challenge3.67
Questions4.67
Open full professor record
Luis Mieses Gomez 18 reported responses 3.98Eval / 5
Overall3.98 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology4.68
Synthesis4.08
Collaboration3.34
Connection3.25
Contribution3.96
Discussion4.22
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.00
Reflection4.12
Respect4.75
Creativity4.13
Feedback3.52
Interaction4.38
Challenge4.04
Questions4.58
Open full professor record
Amatullah Fakhruddin Sethjiwala 4 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology4.85
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.75
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.25
Reflection4.50
Respect4.35
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.35
Challenge4.50
Questions4.65
Open full professor record
Chelsea Kendall Chandler 7 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.40
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.70
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Bryce Ikeda 2 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Rahul Aedula 17 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.07
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity3.87
Grading4.13
Reflection4.73
Respect4.97
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Abdulrahman Abdullah Alaraj 3 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.70
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect4.50
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Tiffany Vo Phan 24 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5

24 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.61
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.71
Collaboration4.61
Connection4.30
Contribution4.13
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity3.95
Grading4.69
Reflection4.73
Respect4.91
Creativity4.52
Feedback4.62
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.71
Questions4.76
Open full professor record
Spencer Robert Paulissen 12 reported responses 4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration3.40
Connection3.40
Contribution3.75
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity3.15
Grading4.60
Reflection4.00
Respect4.50
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.10
Interaction3.90
Challenge3.95
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Alexander William Ray 60 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5

60 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.83
Synthesis4.44
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.01
Contribution4.14
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity3.85
Grading4.48
Reflection4.48
Respect4.69
Creativity4.46
Feedback4.37
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.68
Questions4.72
Open full professor record
Naga Sai Meenakshi Sistla 24 reported responses 3.78Eval / 5
Overall3.78 / 5

24 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.45
Synthesis3.95
Collaboration3.90
Connection3.20
Contribution3.65
Discussion4.05
Inclusivity2.70
Grading3.70
Reflection3.75
Respect4.65
Creativity3.75
Feedback3.20
Interaction4.10
Challenge3.80
Questions4.50
Open full professor record
Nikhith Sannidhi 51 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5

51 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.21
Technology4.64
Synthesis4.51
Collaboration4.42
Connection3.95
Contribution4.18
Discussion4.43
Inclusivity3.81
Grading4.35
Reflection4.45
Respect4.70
Creativity4.39
Feedback4.11
Interaction4.59
Challenge4.56
Questions4.62
Open full professor record
Nikolaus Correll 57 reported responses 3.60Eval / 5
Overall3.60 / 5

57 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.55
Technology4.15
Synthesis3.65
Collaboration3.05
Connection3.45
Contribution3.30
Discussion3.65
Inclusivity3.10
Grading3.80
Reflection3.60
Respect4.25
Creativity4.00
Feedback2.85
Interaction3.90
Challenge3.70
Questions3.60
Open full professor record
Jerome Hoganson Gammie 33 reported responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5

33 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration4.15
Connection3.30
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.10
Grading3.65
Reflection4.20
Respect4.65
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.45
Questions4.20
Open full professor record
Pragna Mandadi 12 reported responses 3.91Eval / 5
Overall3.91 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.85
Connection3.50
Contribution3.85
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.75
Grading3.95
Reflection4.15
Respect4.15
Creativity3.85
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.25
Challenge3.85
Questions4.40
Open full professor record
Kayleigh Bishop 13 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.45
Connection3.85
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.95
Grading4.25
Reflection4.75
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.50
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Teo Price-Broncucia 14 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.35
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.70
Creativity3.70
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.35
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Alec Reed 3 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.75
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.25
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Baljot Kaur 14 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.00
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.80
Grading3.80
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.40
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Rahul Kumar Mohan Kumar 13 reported responses 3.47Eval / 5
Overall3.47 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.90
Technology3.80
Synthesis2.90
Collaboration4.00
Connection2.80
Contribution2.70
Discussion3.60
Inclusivity2.90
Grading3.10
Reflection3.30
Respect4.50
Creativity3.60
Feedback2.80
Interaction4.20
Challenge3.80
Questions3.80
Open full professor record
Daniel Torres 7 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.90
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration4.30
Connection3.70
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.70
Reflection4.30
Respect4.80
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.10
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Tuhina Tripathi 34 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5

34 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.11
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.21
Collaboration3.82
Connection4.04
Contribution3.96
Discussion4.41
Inclusivity4.32
Grading4.18
Reflection4.37
Respect4.75
Creativity4.49
Feedback4.22
Interaction4.36
Challenge4.64
Questions4.48
Open full professor record
Ojasvi Bhalerao 36 reported responses 4.05Eval / 5
Overall4.05 / 5

36 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.06
Technology4.42
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.18
Connection3.52
Contribution4.06
Discussion4.19
Inclusivity3.43
Grading3.74
Reflection4.23
Respect4.58
Creativity4.05
Feedback3.83
Interaction4.52
Challenge4.48
Questions4.24
Open full professor record
Morgan Emily Byers 60 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5

60 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.12
Technology4.84
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration4.08
Connection3.78
Contribution3.94
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity2.92
Grading4.62
Reflection4.42
Respect4.69
Creativity4.33
Feedback4.32
Interaction4.51
Challenge4.62
Questions4.66
Open full professor record
Varsha Srikanth Koushik 5 reported responses 3.32Eval / 5
Overall3.32 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.40
Technology3.80
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration3.40
Connection2.80
Contribution2.80
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity1.00
Grading3.00
Reflection3.40
Respect4.00
Creativity3.30
Feedback3.20
Interaction3.20
Challenge3.40
Questions3.20
Open full professor record
Amit Kiran Rege 18 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.04
Technology4.97
Synthesis4.07
Collaboration3.86
Connection4.01
Contribution3.93
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.02
Grading4.96
Reflection4.08
Respect4.98
Creativity4.98
Feedback4.83
Interaction3.85
Challenge4.95
Questions4.94
Open full professor record
Angel Dong 7 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.50
Connection3.60
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.40
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Mary Martin 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Christopher Ojukwu 14 reported responses 3.50Eval / 5
Overall3.50 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.85
Technology4.20
Synthesis3.05
Collaboration3.40
Connection2.70
Contribution3.40
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity2.05
Grading3.00
Reflection3.40
Respect4.45
Creativity2.90
Feedback3.45
Interaction4.10
Challenge3.70
Questions3.70
Open full professor record
Raegan Rychecky 23 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.15
Connection4.05
Contribution3.85
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.20
Reflection4.25
Respect4.65
Creativity3.95
Feedback3.95
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.40
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Elise Tate 88 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5

88 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.34
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.17
Connection3.97
Contribution3.96
Discussion4.71
Inclusivity3.62
Grading4.39
Reflection4.72
Respect4.91
Creativity4.49
Feedback4.17
Interaction4.71
Challenge4.72
Questions4.74
Open full professor record
Breanne Crockett 11 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.00
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.20
Reflection4.50
Respect4.60
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.30
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Enora Rice 10 reported responses 3.65Eval / 5
Overall3.65 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology3.90
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.00
Contribution3.70
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity2.20
Grading3.40
Reflection3.40
Respect4.10
Creativity3.40
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.70
Questions3.90
Open full professor record
Maria Valentini 9 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.30
Connection3.10
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.70
Grading3.80
Reflection4.10
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.30
Questions4.10
Open full professor record
Jot Kaur 34 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5

34 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.14
Technology4.74
Synthesis4.34
Collaboration4.43
Connection3.89
Contribution4.08
Discussion4.72
Inclusivity3.52
Grading3.87
Reflection4.33
Respect4.72
Creativity4.13
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.66
Challenge4.51
Questions4.53
Open full professor record
Lucia Jayne 9 reported responses 4.06Eval / 5
Overall4.06 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology4.80
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.20
Connection3.90
Contribution3.60
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.90
Reflection4.10
Respect4.70
Creativity3.70
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.20
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Michelle Ramsahoye 11 reported responses 3.81Eval / 5
Overall3.81 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.48
Technology4.68
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.37
Connection4.13
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.61
Inclusivity4.67
Grading3.63
Reflection4.68
Respect4.92
Creativity4.52
Feedback3.15
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.68
Questions4.13
Open full professor record
Xuefei Sun 14 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.10
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.10
Reflection4.20
Respect4.60
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.40
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Zach Atkins 29 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5

29 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.15
Connection3.85
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.15
Reflection4.35
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.50
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Tuan Tran 11 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.10
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.60
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Open full professor record
Sachin Sharma 12 reported responses 4.02Eval / 5
Overall4.02 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.10
Connection3.30
Contribution3.60
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.20
Grading4.50
Reflection4.20
Respect4.20
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.10
Challenge3.90
Questions4.20
Open full professor record
Tanmay Desai 5 reported responses 3.85Eval / 5
Overall3.85 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.20
Connection3.60
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.00
Reflection4.20
Respect4.40
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.00
Questions4.40
Open full professor record
Aditya Chandra 62 reported responses 3.82Eval / 5
Overall3.82 / 5

62 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology4.24
Synthesis3.84
Collaboration3.83
Connection3.49
Contribution3.62
Discussion3.72
Inclusivity3.22
Grading3.51
Reflection3.69
Respect4.41
Creativity3.74
Feedback3.32
Interaction4.16
Challenge3.86
Questions4.04
Open full professor record
Mahidhara Reddy Kankara 60 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

60 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.87
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.08
Connection3.66
Contribution4.03
Discussion4.76
Inclusivity2.85
Grading4.41
Reflection4.54
Respect4.65
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.64
Interaction4.64
Challenge4.48
Questions4.72
Open full professor record
Kyler Ruvane 35 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5

35 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.53
Connection4.03
Contribution4.33
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity3.53
Grading4.27
Reflection4.50
Respect4.73
Creativity4.53
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.57
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Lin Shi 61 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5

61 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.79
Synthesis4.11
Collaboration4.29
Connection3.58
Contribution4.02
Discussion4.66
Inclusivity3.05
Grading4.11
Reflection4.35
Respect4.68
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.34
Interaction4.41
Challenge4.54
Questions4.82
Open full professor record
Samagna Talanki Sreenivasa Murthy 14 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.20
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.30
Reflection4.60
Respect4.60
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Anush Kumar Venkatesh 39 reported responses 4.06Eval / 5
Overall4.06 / 5

39 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.67
Technology4.74
Synthesis3.84
Collaboration3.85
Connection3.50
Contribution3.94
Discussion4.23
Inclusivity3.12
Grading3.94
Reflection4.57
Respect4.34
Creativity4.18
Feedback3.74
Interaction4.36
Challenge4.37
Questions4.67
Open full professor record
Michelle Tran 15 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.30
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.20
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Niharika Sathyanarayana 15 reported responses 3.99Eval / 5
Overall3.99 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.14
Synthesis3.98
Collaboration3.71
Connection3.64
Contribution3.64
Discussion4.09
Inclusivity3.75
Grading3.64
Reflection3.98
Respect3.75
Creativity3.97
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.02
Challenge3.95
Questions4.51
Open full professor record
Aishwarya Purandas Satwani 3 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology4.30
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.70
Contribution3.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.70
Grading3.70
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.70
Questions3.70
Open full professor record
Chiranthan Sridhar 36 reported responses 4.02Eval / 5
Overall4.02 / 5

36 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.81
Technology4.64
Synthesis4.06
Collaboration3.78
Connection3.57
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.12
Inclusivity3.34
Grading3.95
Reflection4.21
Respect4.55
Creativity4.19
Feedback4.01
Interaction4.27
Challenge4.22
Questions4.51
Open full professor record
Mohammed Adib Oumer 23 reported responses 3.08Eval / 5
Overall3.08 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology3.42
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration3.47
Connection3.17
Contribution3.09
Discussion3.61
Inclusivity3.82
Grading2.82
Reflection3.73
Respect3.45
Creativity3.41
Feedback2.71
Interaction3.80
Challenge3.03
Questions3.10
Open full professor record
Siva Pabbineedi 43 reported responses 4.06Eval / 5
Overall4.06 / 5

43 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.98
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.08
Collaboration4.18
Connection3.95
Contribution3.88
Discussion4.48
Inclusivity3.53
Grading3.90
Reflection4.18
Respect4.22
Creativity3.74
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.48
Challenge4.18
Questions4.71
Open full professor record
Nolan Richard Bonnie 10 reported responses 3.92Eval / 5
Overall3.92 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.30
Connection3.30
Contribution3.60
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity2.90
Grading3.80
Reflection3.80
Respect4.40
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.30
Challenge3.90
Questions4.30
Open full professor record
Srikrishna Bangalore Raghu 13 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.30
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.30
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.30
Questions4.30
Open full professor record
Pritalee Kadam 19 reported responses 3.89Eval / 5
Overall3.89 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.97
Technology4.68
Synthesis3.66
Collaboration4.11
Connection3.72
Contribution3.36
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity3.23
Grading3.88
Reflection4.27
Respect4.57
Creativity3.86
Feedback3.66
Interaction4.79
Challenge3.93
Questions3.96
Open full professor record
Nick Cooper 12 reported responses 3.72Eval / 5
Overall3.72 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration3.70
Connection2.50
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity2.60
Grading3.50
Reflection3.80
Respect4.50
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.40
Interaction3.90
Challenge3.80
Questions4.20
Open full professor record
Pawin Taechoyotin 30 reported responses 4.08Eval / 5
Overall4.08 / 5

30 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.18
Technology4.64
Synthesis3.86
Collaboration3.24
Connection3.33
Contribution3.68
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity1.97
Grading4.02
Reflection3.92
Respect4.54
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.89
Interaction3.89
Challenge4.25
Questions4.76
Open full professor record
Gaurav Roy 16 reported responses 3.79Eval / 5
Overall3.79 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.86
Technology4.48
Synthesis3.98
Collaboration4.31
Connection3.42
Contribution3.75
Discussion4.03
Inclusivity3.38
Grading3.41
Reflection4.36
Respect4.54
Creativity3.91
Feedback3.74
Interaction4.29
Challenge3.95
Questions4.28
Open full professor record
Vrinda Anil 25 reported responses 4.18Eval / 5
Overall4.18 / 5

25 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.89
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.07
Collaboration4.22
Connection2.98
Contribution3.99
Discussion4.17
Inclusivity3.12
Grading3.95
Reflection4.15
Respect4.37
Creativity4.09
Feedback4.08
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.06
Questions4.37
Open full professor record
Juan Vasquez 8 reported responses 3.76Eval / 5
Overall3.76 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.40
Connection3.50
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity3.20
Grading3.30
Reflection3.80
Respect4.50
Creativity3.70
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.70
Questions4.00
Open full professor record
Brendan Crowe 16 reported responses 3.94Eval / 5
Overall3.94 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.87
Technology3.90
Synthesis3.93
Collaboration4.39
Connection3.44
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.72
Inclusivity2.20
Grading3.45
Reflection4.25
Respect4.70
Creativity4.15
Feedback3.71
Interaction3.75
Challenge4.46
Questions4.32
Open full professor record
Kaustubh Milind Kulkarni 69 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5

69 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.61
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.32
Connection3.75
Contribution4.17
Discussion4.49
Inclusivity3.54
Grading4.01
Reflection4.43
Respect4.44
Creativity4.41
Feedback4.02
Interaction4.33
Challenge4.52
Questions4.32
Open full professor record
Chethan Kavaraganahalli Prasanna 15 reported responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.80
Connection3.40
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.40
Reflection4.20
Respect4.50
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.30
Questions4.30
Open full professor record
Aaptha Boggaram 11 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.30
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.60
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Zachary Kaufman 21 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.89
Technology4.93
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.11
Connection3.35
Contribution3.93
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.72
Grading4.08
Reflection4.66
Respect4.95
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.87
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.58
Questions4.97
Open full professor record
Patrick Cooper 19 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.00
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.25
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.60
Questions4.75
Open full professor record
Lita Suwattee 50 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5

50 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.19
Technology4.36
Synthesis4.27
Collaboration3.95
Connection3.54
Contribution4.09
Discussion4.32
Inclusivity3.42
Grading4.18
Reflection4.14
Respect4.30
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.42
Challenge4.33
Questions4.53
Open full professor record
Amanda Hernandez Sandate 15 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.61
Synthesis4.66
Collaboration4.52
Connection3.83
Contribution4.46
Discussion4.71
Inclusivity4.01
Grading4.66
Reflection4.41
Respect4.80
Creativity4.69
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.68
Challenge4.76
Questions4.76
Open full professor record
Nicholas Papadopoulos 9 reported responses 3.86Eval / 5
Overall3.86 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration3.40
Connection2.85
Contribution3.85
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.25
Grading3.00
Reflection4.40
Respect4.35
Creativity4.05
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.35
Questions4.40
Open full professor record
Advait Deshmukh 43 reported responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5

43 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.16
Technology4.38
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.01
Connection3.68
Contribution4.02
Discussion4.18
Inclusivity3.75
Grading3.95
Reflection4.12
Respect4.32
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.09
Interaction4.23
Challenge4.27
Questions4.64
Open full professor record
Kelechi Ezema 21 reported responses 4.07Eval / 5
Overall4.07 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.20
Connection3.10
Contribution3.95
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity3.05
Grading4.00
Reflection4.10
Respect4.55
Creativity4.05
Feedback3.55
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.35
Questions4.10
Open full professor record
Jen Macdonald 16 reported responses 4.18Eval / 5
Overall4.18 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.10
Connection3.70
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.45
Grading4.15
Reflection3.95
Respect4.40
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.35
Challenge4.30
Questions4.55
Open full professor record
Marissa Chitwood 19 reported responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.50
Synthesis3.95
Collaboration4.10
Connection3.85
Contribution3.85
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.55
Grading4.05
Reflection4.15
Respect4.50
Creativity4.15
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.95
Questions4.45
Open full professor record
Richard Terrile 20 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration4.30
Connection3.35
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.20
Grading3.80
Reflection3.95
Respect4.40
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.25
Questions4.85
Open full professor record
Ishita Badole 30 reported responses 4.05Eval / 5
Overall4.05 / 5

30 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.65
Connection3.65
Contribution3.85
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.40
Grading3.95
Reflection4.20
Respect4.40
Creativity4.25
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.25
Challenge4.15
Questions4.40
Open full professor record
Spencer David Wilson 108 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5

108 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration3.70
Connection3.95
Contribution3.85
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.65
Grading4.25
Reflection4.15
Respect4.70
Creativity4.55
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.40
Questions4.45
Open full professor record
Pranjal Aggarwal 14 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration3.35
Connection3.40
Contribution3.85
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.60
Reflection4.20
Respect4.75
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.65
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.70
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Mihir Shrestha 23 reported responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology4.35
Synthesis3.99
Collaboration3.63
Connection3.89
Contribution3.63
Discussion3.97
Inclusivity3.61
Grading4.27
Reflection4.22
Respect4.34
Creativity4.21
Feedback3.78
Interaction3.99
Challenge4.00
Questions4.26
Open full professor record
Aditya Thaker 22 reported responses 3.97Eval / 5
Overall3.97 / 5

22 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology4.20
Synthesis3.85
Collaboration3.80
Connection3.65
Contribution3.40
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity3.20
Grading3.95
Reflection3.95
Respect4.30
Creativity4.15
Feedback3.95
Interaction4.05
Challenge3.95
Questions4.35
Open full professor record
Zhiheng Wang 10 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.69
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.69
Collaboration4.69
Connection4.54
Contribution4.46
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity3.62
Grading4.38
Reflection4.62
Respect4.58
Creativity4.46
Feedback4.62
Interaction4.31
Challenge4.50
Questions4.92
Open full professor record
Carson Kohlbrenner 12 reported responses 3.71Eval / 5
Overall3.71 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.27
Technology4.24
Synthesis3.54
Collaboration2.70
Connection3.61
Contribution3.15
Discussion3.85
Inclusivity3.54
Grading3.81
Reflection3.08
Respect4.31
Creativity3.85
Feedback3.54
Interaction2.93
Challenge4.30
Questions3.93
Open full professor record
Hye-Young Jo 7 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.00
Contribution4.30
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.60
Grading5.00
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.60
Challenge5.00
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Atharva Peshkar 5 reported responses 2.72Eval / 5
Overall2.72 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.80
Technology2.40
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration1.60
Connection2.20
Contribution2.20
Discussion3.20
Inclusivity1.70
Grading2.70
Reflection3.00
Respect3.20
Creativity2.80
Feedback2.40
Interaction3.00
Challenge3.00
Questions3.20
Open full professor record
Jalynn Nicoly 86 reported responses 3.92Eval / 5
Overall3.92 / 5

86 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.68
Technology4.55
Synthesis3.73
Collaboration3.43
Connection3.63
Contribution3.53
Discussion4.22
Inclusivity3.11
Grading4.10
Reflection3.78
Respect4.55
Creativity4.05
Feedback3.58
Interaction4.07
Challenge4.10
Questions4.40
Open full professor record
Kaleb Bishop 6 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.30
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.60
Reflection4.70
Respect4.70
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.50
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Nicole Jone 4 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.50
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Jacob Simons 18 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.10
Connection3.90
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.10
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Jerry Gammie 12 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.32
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.41
Collaboration4.59
Connection4.08
Contribution4.64
Discussion4.12
Inclusivity3.42
Grading4.42
Reflection4.64
Respect4.28
Creativity4.56
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.62
Challenge4.41
Questions4.73
Open full professor record
Michael Middleton 3 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.50
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.50
Reflection4.00
Respect4.70
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.30
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Michael Buchanan 12 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.72
Technology4.91
Synthesis4.82
Collaboration4.86
Connection4.75
Contribution4.82
Discussion4.86
Inclusivity4.82
Grading4.79
Reflection4.84
Respect4.95
Creativity4.79
Feedback4.84
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.84
Questions4.93
Open full professor record
Blake Cragen 9 reported responses 3.84Eval / 5
Overall3.84 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.70
Connection3.70
Contribution3.60
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity2.80
Grading3.80
Reflection3.80
Respect4.10
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.20
Challenge3.90
Questions3.90
Open full professor record
Ada Zhao 2 reported responses 3.00Eval / 5
Overall3.00 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Collaboration3.00
Connection3.00
Contribution3.00
Reflection3.00
Interaction3.00
Open full professor record
Kevin Lane 20 reported responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.80
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.20
Grading4.30
Reflection4.10
Respect4.50
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.00
Questions4.40
Open full professor record
Sai Lalith Kumar Aka 5 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.60
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.80
Reflection5.00
Respect4.20
Creativity4.80
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Tanner Smith 5 reported responses 3.72Eval / 5
Overall3.72 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.80
Technology4.46
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration3.46
Connection3.23
Contribution3.85
Discussion4.38
Inclusivity2.70
Grading3.69
Reflection4.08
Respect4.00
Creativity3.15
Feedback4.38
Interaction3.85
Challenge3.62
Questions4.62
Open full professor record
Pedro Lemos 9 reported responses 4.03Eval / 5
Overall4.03 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.82
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.72
Collaboration3.43
Connection4.02
Contribution3.92
Discussion4.27
Inclusivity3.15
Grading4.38
Reflection4.29
Respect4.72
Creativity4.32
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.68
Challenge4.50
Questions4.77
Open full professor record
Bhargav Shandilya 21 reported responses 3.31Eval / 5
Overall3.31 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.20
Collaboration2.30
Connection3.30
Contribution3.10
Discussion3.70
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.40
Reflection3.30
Respect4.10
Creativity3.40
Feedback2.60
Interaction3.50
Challenge3.50
Questions3.80
Open full professor record
Chen Liu 7 reported responses 3.89Eval / 5
Overall3.89 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.00
Contribution3.60
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.20
Reflection3.90
Respect4.60
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.90
Interaction3.70
Challenge3.30
Questions3.70
Open full professor record
Jake Simons 3 reported responses 3.99Eval / 5
Overall3.99 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology3.70
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.00
Respect4.50
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.70
Questions4.00
Open full professor record
Ishneet Chadha 2 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Nolan Brady 5 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.40
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.