Course record COMM
COMM 3610
Communication, Technology, and Society
University of Colorado Boulder
465 grades17 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score46/100
Mixed record
John Martin Ackerman 26 grades · 1 term 3.58GPA
26 letter grades
Compare with the course
Ackerman vs. the course average
A
+5.9
B
+6.1
C
−9.9
D
−1.1
F
−1.1
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 26 enrolled.
Overall4.37 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.50
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.50
Grading3.50
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Carolin Aurian 25 grades · 1 term 3.52GPA
25 letter grades
Compare with the course
Aurian vs. the course average
A
+19.9
B
−15.9
C
−1.9
D
−1.1
F
−1.1
Difference in percentage points.
3.8% withdrew · 1 of 26 enrolled.
Malinda Dietrich 101 grades · 1 term 3.42GPA
101 letter grades
Compare with the course
Dietrich vs. the course average
A
+14.3
B
−10.2
C
−4.9
D
−0.1
F
+0.9
Difference in percentage points.
2.9% withdrew · 3 of 104 enrolled.
Overall4.71 / 5
77 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.59
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.61
Collaboration4.48
Connection4.66
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity4.61
Grading4.75
Reflection4.67
Respect4.84
Creativity4.61
Feedback4.59
Interaction4.76
Challenge4.68
Questions4.78
Deepti Khedekar 27 grades · 1 term 3.22GPA
27 letter grades
Compare with the course
Khedekar vs. the course average
A
+0.4
B
+0.6
C
−6.2
D
+2.6
F
+2.6
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 27 enrolled.
Overall4.91 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.90
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.90
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Grant Charles Pustelnik 28 grades · 1 term 3.21GPA
28 letter grades
Compare with the course
Pustelnik vs. the course average
A
+2.3
B
−4.6
C
+0.8
D
−1.1
F
+2.5
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 28 enrolled.
Overall4.15 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration3.30
Connection4.10
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.40
Reflection3.90
Respect3.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.40
Interaction3.90
Challenge4.00
Questions4.70
Michael Warren Cook 26 grades · 1 term 3.18GPA
26 letter grades
Compare with the course
Cook vs. the course average
A
−1.8
B
+2.3
C
−6.0
D
+2.8
F
+2.8
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 26 enrolled.
Theodore G Striphas 158 grades · 1 term 3.18GPA
158 letter grades
Compare with the course
Striphas vs. the course average
A
−6.7
B
+4.9
C
+4.0
D
−1.1
F
−1.1
Difference in percentage points.
1.3% withdrew · 2 of 160 enrolled.
Overall4.51 / 5
71 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration3.97
Connection4.66
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.69
Grading4.72
Reflection4.67
Respect4.80
Creativity4.67
Feedback4.59
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.63
Questions4.80
Bryan Copeland Taylor 74 grades · 1 term 3.02GPA
74 letter grades
Compare with the course
Taylor vs. the course average
A
−14.4
B
+7.5
C
+6.3
D
+1.6
F
−1.1
Difference in percentage points.
3.9% withdrew · 3 of 77 enrolled.
Overall4.63 / 5
64 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.42
Technology4.68
Synthesis4.54
Collaboration4.23
Connection4.71
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity4.49
Grading4.44
Reflection4.40
Respect4.64
Creativity4.39
Feedback4.32
Interaction4.42
Challenge4.46
Questions4.61
Carolin Aronis 13 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.91
Technology4.52
Synthesis4.73
Collaboration3.92
Connection4.88
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.95
Grading4.23
Reflection4.98
Respect5.00
Creativity4.65
Feedback3.72
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Bailey Troutman 4 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Colleen G Campbell 17 reported responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.92
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.92
Collaboration4.68
Connection4.92
Contribution4.92
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.92
Grading4.92
Reflection4.92
Respect4.92
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.92
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.82
Questions4.85
Mally Dietrich 15 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.68
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.72
Collaboration4.42
Connection4.80
Contribution4.68
Discussion4.59
Inclusivity4.71
Grading4.80
Reflection4.82
Respect4.75
Creativity4.82
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.75
Questions4.57
Brandon Daniels 8 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology4.31
Synthesis4.31
Collaboration4.46
Connection4.77
Contribution4.46
Discussion4.54
Inclusivity4.92
Grading4.77
Reflection4.54
Respect4.77
Creativity4.23
Feedback4.54
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.31
Questions4.77
Warren Cook 21 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology3.90
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.70
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.70
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Cara Wilson 1 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection3.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.00
Questions3.00
Tajshen Geneva Campbell 5 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.54
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.61
Connection4.70
Contribution4.84
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.84
Grading4.84
Reflection4.84
Respect4.70
Creativity4.61
Feedback4.61
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.61
Questions4.70
Timothy R Kuhn 7 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.90
Connection5.00
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.70
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.40
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.90
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.